Toggle sidebar

our lack of talent is obvious tonight**

M

MaroonedNdaRock

Redshirt
Nov 9, 2010
610
0
0
If you can't see how much more size and speed UK has....

We are winning because We have uped our intensity, playing defense, and valuing the basketball much better than usual. Also, UK's youth is showing. They looked a little rattled to start. As evident by the poor shooting.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
they cant guard Bost
Moultrie is dunking in their face
Sidney is making their best player leave the paint to guard him

I mean good grief- I've never seen such bullshiit out of you people
 
M

MaroonedNdaRock

Redshirt
Nov 9, 2010
610
0
0
We are talented enough that we should have won the last three games. No question, that is on the coach. However talent alone is not winning this game tonight. We are just playing solid basketball.
 
S

shsdawg

Redshirt
Mar 30, 2010
2,616
0
0
overall. If you can't see that then you are and idiot. We have two players on the floor at their level now. We are playing on emotion. Remember the famous JWS quote? We played the last three on talent.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
Sidney's talent alone has made Kentucky change the way they like to play defense- Davis has to leave the paint and makes them vulnerable

Sidney has talent is why they have to do that- Lewis doesnt- and he can stay in the paint vs him

Thats what talent means
 
S

shsdawg

Redshirt
Mar 30, 2010
2,616
0
0
when we go to the bench do we drop off more or less than they do? We are playing one hell of a game, but the talent is big time on their side. Your friends in the media would agree with me here I think.
 
S

shsdawg

Redshirt
Mar 30, 2010
2,616
0
0
will make up fora lot of talent. We are playing with those for perhaps the first time since Vandy.
 
S

shsdawg

Redshirt
Mar 30, 2010
2,616
0
0
me........since you are into "stars" what is the average # of "stars" of UK people that have hit the floor vs ours?
 
S

shsdawg

Redshirt
Mar 30, 2010
2,616
0
0
wasn't that great. That isn't that great a difference from saying it is even.You are correct of course, even the media agrees.**
 
R

Repeat Offender

Redshirt
Dec 30, 2009
304
0
0
You are a 17ing idiot. I guess that we are deeper than UK too with our numerous All-Americans that you always talk about. Is Moultrie still going to get POY? Stupid 17. Read more, post less, 10,000 plus posts about the same **** gets old.
 
K

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
reaching here, Einstein. I'm pretty sure NOBODY claimed this team isn't talented. The debate was over how talented. You're under the impression its the reincarnation of the 92 dream team while others aren't. What's so hard to see there? Jesus. 17 I fell for your dumbass ****.
 
C

clydefrazier

Redshirt
Jan 28, 2010
394
0
0
What player (s) of ours starts for Ky? Bost? and Moultrie?
Not Sid, Hood, Bryant, Lewis or Steele. I would say only Hood possibly gets any minutes. We dont have anyone that can handle 3 or 14 physically. Their 5 on the floor are all capable offensively where Sid is an offensive liability as is Bryant and Steele other than wide open threes.
 
R

Repeat Offender

Redshirt
Dec 30, 2009
304
0
0
the talent on both teams, you are 17ing retarded. UK has guys on the bench that don't play who could beat out Steele. Bryant, and Lewis. Does depth count towards your talent gap calculations?What about the number of McD AAs on each school? The fact that every kid on the floor for UK was a 5 star player, some of these would be playing pro ball this year if it were not for the new rules that were implemented 2 seasons ago. I concede coach, we arejust astalented UK, their #1 ranking is just political.****
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom