PAC16: 2 auto BCS bids and potential for div champs to play for BCS champ

beachbumdawg

Senior
Nov 28, 2006
2,910
696
113
will have no champ game???

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5270048



With Nebraska apparently headed to the Big Ten, the Pac-10 is poised to become the Pac-16.
</p>

</p>

Colorado already has received an invitation to join the conference, while five other invitations will be extended to Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Texas Tech, according to a source familiar with the negotiations.
</p>

</p>

A Big 12 football coach, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told ESPN.com's Mark Schlabach on Wednesday night that if Nebraska left the Big 12 the conference would dissolve, according to his athletics director and university president. The coach said Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Colorado would join the Pac-10, leaving Baylor, Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri and Iowa State behind.
</p>

</p>

"Nebraska is the key," the coach said.
</p>

</p>

The coach said the Pac-10 favored Colorado over Baylor because of the Buffaloes' presence in the Denver TV market.
</p>

</p>

Another Big 12 coach said Wednesday night that an anticipated Nebraska announcement of moving toward the Big Ten Thursday would indeed trigger the death of the Big 12 and a mass migration west.
</p>

"If Nebraska leaves," the coach said, "everyone has to look."
</p>

</p>

The new conference would be split into divisions with the Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Colorado forming an Eastern Division with Arizona and Arizona State opposite the former Pac-8 (USC, UCLA, Stanford, Washington, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State) in the Western Division. The division champions would play at season's end for the conference championship, the source said.
</p>

</p>

The coach said it's possible the Pac-16 would push for two automatic bids to the BCS, one for each division champion. That potential bonanza could open the possibility of the two division champs from one league playing for the national title, and it would eliminate the need for a conference championship game.
</p>

"The Pac-10 doesn't believe in a championship game," the coach said. "And coaches in the Big 12 don't like it anyway."
</p>

Events have unfolded very quickly, the Big 12 coach said.
</p>

"Until the last two days, everyone thought the Big 12 was staying intact," he said.
</p>

As quickly as the Big 12 has rushed to the brink of collapse, it could take quite some time for it to become formalized. The coach said the league will have to go on for two more years before splitting up.
</p>

Asked how awkward that would be, the coach joked, "I don't think I'll go to the conference meetings this year [Big 12 football media day in Dallas next month]."
</p>

</p>

The only potential hitch is Nebraska and the Big Ten not coming to an agreement. But even in that scenario, which appears unlikely, the Pac-10 will expand to at least 12 teams, said the source familiar with the negotiations. While Colorado is in and Utah is a top alternative candidate, it's also possible that the Pac-10 would make a play for Nebraska or another Big 12 school instead of Utah.
</p>

</p>

"If Nebraska gets left at the alter by the Big Ten, which would slight them at the 11th hour, then it might be hard for them to stay in the Big 12," the source said.
</p>

</p>

It would take a week to 10 days to finalize the details of a Pac-16. The blockbuster deal would add the nation's No. 5 (Dallas), No. 10 (Houston) and No. 16 (Denver) TV markets to the conference, which already includes No. 2 Los Angeles, No. 6 San Francisco, No. 12 Phoenix and No. 13 Seattle.
</p>

</p>

With that large population base, the new conference would start its own network and, along with other broadcast partners, likely would distribute around $20 million per member, comparable broadcast revenue to the Big Ten ($22 million) and SEC ($17 million), the source said.
</p>

</p>

The Big 12 distributed $7-12 million per year. The Pac-10 distributed $8-10 million.</p>
 

TR.sixpack

Redshirt
Feb 14, 2008
3,268
0
0
It sounded as if the 5 leftovers will try to add MWC members to keep the league and automatic BCS bid. Otherwise, does one of the non-AQ leagues pick up the bid? Or does it become an at-large bid?
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,030
25,031
113
I think we'll see a merger of the MWC and the rest of the Big 12. Some schools may be dropped, but the MWC would still be able to continue as a viable league (not sure if that would be an option for the remnants of the Big 12 or not, the rule is that you have to have either 5 or 6 schools in the conference for 4 years). Wouldn't matter either way though. The merged league would most likely get a BCS spot. Hell, the MWC was close to getting one anyway even if no realignment had happened.</p>
 

Rebels7

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
1,389
0
0
That makes Alabama look humble.

"Don't believe in a championship game..." Tough ****, pal, should have stayed at 10 teams, jackass.
 

rugbdawg

Redshirt
Oct 10, 2006
5,251
0
0
"Big 6" AND you don't play a championship game...it's really just two separate conferences. You would only play ONE team from the other side each year. So...you have either Texas or Oklahoma in a BCS game every year. Then...you have *****, ***** USC protected in their ***** Western Division.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,030
25,031
113
after the rest of the BCS finishes laughing their asses off at the PAC-10's ridiculous request. There's no way in hell the other BCS conferences are going to even think of allowing the PAC-10 to get 2 automatic berths. I bet the PAC-10 will suddenly "find Jesus" on the whole beliving in a championship game thing.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
18,971
14,922
113
No way in hell Texas, Teaxas A&M, Texas Tech and Oklahoma goes to the Pac 10. They just don't fit the norm.