I’m not that concerned. Nagao will be back. Whether or not he stays at 133 and battles Davis for the spot or moves up to 141 remains to be seen. Maybe Luke grows out of 125 and moves up? There are a lot of moving parts every year. It will work itself out. Cole is a true freshman wrestling against experienced, larger HWTs. I’ll give him a chance before I write him off for next year.133 and hwt a concern for next year
Cole should add good weight with another year in the program.I’m not that concerned. Nagao will be back. Whether or not he stays at 133 and battles Davis for the spot or moves up to 141 remains to be seen. Maybe Luke grows out of 125 and moves up? There are a lot of moving parts every year. It will work itself out. Cole is a true freshman wrestling against experienced, larger HWTs. I’ll give him a chance before I write him off for next year.
What a clutch takedown
Agree. He also was wrestling two top 10 ranked wrestlers this weekend as a true freshman. That’s a tall task.Cole should add good weight with another year in the program.
Very light needs a lot of muscle guess I am spoiled with kerk.Agree. He also was wrestling two top 10 ranked wrestlers this weekend as a true freshman. That’s a tall task.
He won’t be 220 next year. I bet he’s up to 240-245 of good weight by next year.Agree. He also was wrestling two top 10 ranked wrestlers this weekend as a true freshman. That’s a tall task.
Think he will remember that takedown and working to undo the whizzer by moving his feet to the left instead of the right. The guy would have given up the whizzer so as not to get pinned. I think the reversal call was correct. Basically it was argued that it was a roll through.Always waiting for the Textbook Tom review to get the perspective of the ref.
Seeley won't remember not getting the takedown. He will remember the message he is going to get about taking down when the staff wants him to be neutral. He will be Carter/Levi/Mitchell punching bag this week.
Interesting take which makes sense. I've seen lots of comments stating it was 3 it was a bad call to overturn, but two collegiate refs made the call so they had their reasons. It's too petty for me to just say Angel sucks, the call sucks.......etc.Think he will remember that takedown and working to undo the whizzer by moving his feet to the left instead of the right. The guy would have given up the whizzer so as not to get pinned. I think the reversal call was correct. Basically it was argued that it was a roll through.
Yea. If it was our guy we would be arguing for the whizzer.Interesting take which makes sense. I've seen lots of comments stating it was 3 it was a bad call to overturn, but two collegiate refs made the call so they had their reasons. It's too petty for me to just say Angel sucks, the call sucks.......etc.