I didn't say national appeal, but better than WGN I suspect.MSUCostanza said:Sorry to burst your bubble. We do not have national appeal to TV. We just don't. As a program, we have respect from other programs. But in TV land, we are still Mississippi, plain and simple.
And I don't care by which method we lose the game, if we indeed lose - blowout, buzzer beater, blowing a 30 point lead, it doesn't matter. I don't want to hear anyone complaining, You got what you wanted, a road game against an elite program. I am all for upgrading and making an exciting schedule, but not unless some of those teams are willing to come to Starkville, or play us on a true neutral court.
HD6 said:Hey honey, I know it's only two weeks before Christmas, but can do you think I could take one thousand dollars to go by myself to Los Angeles? I know our two children (one of which is still in the womb at this writing) need gifts and all, and I know I already spend three hundred a year for home basketball games, not to mention the couple of grand I drop during football season for tickets and tailgating, but how about a little me time?
Regardless of if someone likes this news or hates this news(us playing UCLA out there), i would hope everyone can agree that HDNet is hardly nationally televised.lawdawg02 said:our game against washington state was also on HDNet this past year (as was texas tech, i believe). there are lots of media outlets these days, not just cbs and espn. hell, the san diego game was even on tv.</p>ETA: when i said earlier to someone else that "i'm sure it'll be a nationally televised game. maybe CBS will carry it.", i was probably jumping the gun a little. i wasn't thinking about what ucla was losing. i would still put my money on the game being available on television in mississippi in some form.
In terms of level of a program, Cincy is ahead of DePaul...but not by much. Cincy back in the day of Huggins was awesome. Cincy post Huggins is an afterthought, if a thought at all.Todd4State said:How is this any different than when we played Cincinnati last year? Granted, I don't keep up with basketball a lot, but isn't UC a nationally respected program? I know at the very least they're pretty good.
Plus, I bet Byrne made this move mainly because he was expecting a big name team at that SEC/Big East tournament thing in Tampa and instead we got DePaul.
http://www.uclabruins.com/ot/ucla-corporate-mission.htmlHanmudog said:We have a team that can beat UCLA so why not? As stated earlier, these West Coast college basketball fans are not like the ones at Duke, North Carolina, Indiana, or even Memphis. It won't be that big of a home court advantage. Win or lose the RPI will go up in the long run as a result unless UCLA totally sucks next year.