peterson to msu is true
- Thread starter crackerdog
- Start date
and why he's been given 10 years to try is beyond me. oh wait, it was b/c of templedick. and now he is beyond msu. so, now that we have a real ad, we're sure to get a real bball coach soon. he has shown that he's not scared to cut mediocrity out of the msu vocabulary. bury's shelf life is about to expire. if byrne brings in peterson, all the sheep's favorite 'save bury' sayings such as 'bbbbb but who can we get better than bury/to replace bury' is shot to ****. this guy knows how to bring in top coaches. he knows how to run a program and that's exactly what he's going to do. listen up bury, you better get it figured out real soon, b/c your sorry *** has had long enough.
winningest coach in MSU history
212-115 overall record
87-73 conference record
5 NCAA appearances
3 NIT appearances
7 20 win seasons
4 divisional titles
1 overall conference title
1 conference tournament title
in 10 seasons. yeah, lets fire his ***. have you looked at his overall record compared to UK, UF, UT, and the other successful programs in our conference? its pretty damn solid when compared.
i would love nothing more for that program than to see us make it to the second weekend of the tournament. but not doing so doesnt mean he should be canned.
212-115 overall record
87-73 conference record
5 NCAA appearances
3 NIT appearances
7 20 win seasons
4 divisional titles
1 overall conference title
1 conference tournament title
in 10 seasons. yeah, lets fire his ***. have you looked at his overall record compared to UK, UF, UT, and the other successful programs in our conference? its pretty damn solid when compared.
i would love nothing more for that program than to see us make it to the second weekend of the tournament. but not doing so doesnt mean he should be canned.
winning coaches in msu history as well. they had plenty of **** to write up as well...just like your spill for bury. fired jackal's ***. ran polk's *** out as well.
now, see byrne. we have now twice, and we'll see it again. its a new era for msu. no more templeton days of mediocrity.
now, see byrne. we have now twice, and we'll see it again. its a new era for msu. no more templeton days of mediocrity.
Stans should not be fired until he continually starts losing and never competes for SEC titles and never gets into the tourney. He has the winningest record in MSU history and competes and wins SEC titles regularly and gets to the tourney more often then not. That's is far from mediocrity. It's winning and success.
that might be a valid question for football, but not basketball. it will be much either to get a top coach for basketball than football. and if byrne get this right for the football program, it will prove what he's capable of. and we'll hear no more excuses and the sheep can't throw out that, 'but who could we get to come in here'. your days are numbered in vegas bury. start packing.
sec titles, etc. may be the measuring stick for football (b/c there is no playoff). but not in basketball (or baseball). the ncaa tourney is the measuring stick there. and he has not performed. time for a change.
sec titles, etc. may be the measuring stick for football (b/c there is no playoff). but not in basketball (or baseball). the ncaa tourney is the measuring stick there. and he has not performed. time for a change.
while they may not be the same in terms of talent and success, that doesnt mean his point isnt valid. its a matter of the impact their departure would have upon the programcrackerdog said:
if we are skeptical of your opinion of who is a good coach after years of gobbling Quin Snyder's cock.