Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 132842929" data-attributes="member: 1812660"><p>Programs that hope to compete for conference championships can't afford to have a coach averaging 6 wins and 5.8 losses per season.&nbsp; Especially when the only reason the former is higher than the latter is a fluke season where some how WVU played 8 teams with a .500 or worse record.&nbsp; So far a 3-4 6th season doesn't show much hope to improve that mark.&nbsp; Nehlen and RR both showed big improvements in their 3rd year and went on to better things.&nbsp; Stewart and Holgorsen both showed regression in year 3 and were not nearly as good.&nbsp; No reason to think Brown suddenly breaks that trend.&nbsp; WVU is much more likely to keep treading water at this current level than improve based upon historic trends across college football for the last 50+ years.&nbsp; Even if you could point to an exception, and your Beamer bullsh*t has already been debunked, that does not disprove the rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="The Bell Tolls for Thee, post: 132842929, member: 1812660"] Programs that hope to compete for conference championships can't afford to have a coach averaging 6 wins and 5.8 losses per season. Especially when the only reason the former is higher than the latter is a fluke season where some how WVU played 8 teams with a .500 or worse record. So far a 3-4 6th season doesn't show much hope to improve that mark. Nehlen and RR both showed big improvements in their 3rd year and went on to better things. Stewart and Holgorsen both showed regression in year 3 and were not nearly as good. No reason to think Brown suddenly breaks that trend. WVU is much more likely to keep treading water at this current level than improve based upon historic trends across college football for the last 50+ years. Even if you could point to an exception, and your Beamer bullsh*t has already been debunked, that does not disprove the rule. [/QUOTE]

Name