POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

SDC337

All-American
Feb 14, 2021
912
5,626
93


A key aspect of the scam, if you remember, was all the talk of "no evidence of widespread fraud!" talking point... repeated ad nauseum.

Baideng "won" by some 40 thousand votes ballots total spread across 3 states. You didn't need widespread fraud, just pinpoint cheating where you knew you could get away with it.

As I was saying at the time, it's an iq/integrity test. You regurgitate their narrative: hook, line and sinker, and you are simply revealing yourself to be naive at best, treasonous at worst. WE MUST HAVE ELECTIONS WE CAN TRUST. Your word (the media) is not good enough. In this day and age, there is absolutely no legitimate reason we cannot have one person, one verified vote.
 

berniecarbo

Heisman
Apr 29, 2020
5,021
28,590
113
A key aspect of the scam, if you remember, was all the talk of "no evidence of widespread fraud!" talking point... repeated ad nauseum.

Baideng "won" by some 40 thousand votes ballots total spread across 3 states. You didn't need widespread fraud, just pinpoint cheating where you knew you could get away with it.

As I was saying at the time, it's an iq/integrity test. You regurgitate their narrative: hook, line and sinker, and you are simply revealing yourself to be naive at best, treasonous at worst. WE MUST HAVE ELECTIONS WE CAN TRUST. Your word (the media) is not good enough. In this day and age, there is absolutely no legitimate reason we cannot have one person, one verified vote.
With crooked judges, it couldn't be "proven", but anyone who did not know there was enough cheating to steal the election (and other smaller elections) was/is an idiot.
 

JumperJack.

Heisman
Jul 11, 2025
1,983
13,311
113
With crooked judges, it couldn't be "proven", but anyone who did not know there was enough cheating to steal the election (and other smaller elections) was/is an idiot.
And with all the injunctions we’ve seen trying to block Trump this past year, it’s even more glaringly obvious that the judiciary helped solidify the cheating by refusing to allow it to be examined in the light of day.
 

JumperJack.

Heisman
Jul 11, 2025
1,983
13,311
113
The digging into Minnesota’s practices reveals this. Just like California, it is a one party empire of corruption.

I am becoming more inclined to think that we may as well nuke the filibuster and pass laws that stop these things and then take our chances that the democrats do not and never had a plurality in any one state.

 

Lost In FL

Heisman
Oct 5, 2001
20,848
72,047
113
The digging into Minnesota’s practices reveals this. Just like California, it is a one party empire of corruption.

I am becoming more inclined to think that we may as well nuke the filibuster and pass laws that stop these things and then take our chances that the democrats do not and never had a plurality in any one state.


if pressler is concentrating on Minnesota, then things will change there. the dude has "it" when it comes to converting crazy women.
 

AustinTXCat

Hall of Famer
Jan 7, 2003
53,325
315,144
113
Andrew was an Epstein frequenter so I figured you'd have an opinion.
 

Fanon

Freshman
Dec 16, 2025
180
69
28
A key aspect of the scam, if you remember, was all the talk of "no evidence of widespread fraud!" talking point... repeated ad nauseum.

Baideng "won" by some 40 thousand votes ballots total spread across 3 states. You didn't need widespread fraud, just pinpoint cheating where you knew you could get away with it.

As I was saying at the time, it's an iq/integrity test. You regurgitate their narrative: hook, line and sinker, and you are simply revealing yourself to be naive at best, treasonous at worst. WE MUST HAVE ELECTIONS WE CAN TRUST. Your word (the media) is not good enough. In this day and age, there is absolutely no legitimate reason we cannot have one person, one verified vote.
How would you suggest we do that if it’s apparently so easy? How can we be sure our vote was counted accurately as well as all the others?