A key aspect of the scam, if you remember, was all the talk of "no evidence of widespread fraud!" talking point... repeated ad nauseum.
Baideng "won" by some 40 thousand
As I was saying at the time, it's an iq/integrity test. You regurgitate their narrative: hook, line and sinker, and you are simply revealing yourself to be naive at best, treasonous at worst. WE MUST HAVE ELECTIONS WE CAN TRUST. Your word (the media) is not good enough. In this day and age, there is absolutely no legitimate reason we cannot have one person, one verified vote.

