Pope’s defense of Garrison

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
5,928
14,586
78
The worst part about what’s going to happen with Pope (besides the obvious losing) is that he’s going to hurt his legacy here. People won’t be able to separate the player and coach and the fans are going to think of him similar to how we do Cal. The longer this drags out the worse it’ll be too.

I blame Barnhart more than anyone though. He’s the idiot that couldn’t get the job done with the legit candidates so he reached all the way down straight to Pope because he knew he’d accept in a heartbeat. Pope was not even remotely ready for a job like this. Frigging Utah Valley State and BYU are not UK and it’s not like he set the world on fire at his jobs before UK. Hiring a basketball coach at Kentucky who had never even won a tournament game should have gotten Mitch’s *** fired instantly.
I hope I’m not the only one that will say this but I’ll like mark pope regardless of how he does as a coach here. I know the man’s trying his best to put a good team on the floor and that’s why I still haven’t lost hope. You make good points with your post
 

Cats_2010

Heisman
Jan 8, 2010
11,465
19,373
103
There is a time and a place for analytics, coaching basketball in the trenches is not one of them. You have to coach in the moment. I was sky high on popes hire initially but he is losing favor very quickly. I have zero tolerance for BS coaching with the money they make.
 

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
5,928
14,586
78
Let me get this straight. You have no problem with people making up damaging rumors that coaches feel the need to respond but you take issue with baseless rumors being called out. That says a lot about you. You are cool with bad beavior but not with that bad behavior being called out.

PS, I know exactly who you are and I know your other account that just posted under not long ago. I also know some people with the new managment and I can't wait until you use this alias or that other alias to ban me so I can show them the mischief you've enaged in here.
I know you don’t like me but I’m being sincere when I say chill out man. It’s just a message board dude
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2003
3,069
3,969
82
Welp I waisted 25 minutes watching that pregame conference! I have No clue what he's talking about!
That’s kinda the problem. Neither does he. Just a bunch of mindless babble with feel good words. For the record, it has been this way since day one. Just a lot of BBN was still in PTSD from the last five or so years of Cal. And for good reason. But here’s the thing…they are both FOS. Just in vastly different ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RunninRichie

Eagles_Ball_69

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2003
3,069
3,969
82
I hope he turns this all around. I think he’s a great guy. I want him to do good so bad since he was a captain of my favorite team of all time. I’d like for him to start coaching like his mentor Pitino.
People are who they are. Mark Pope the coach and the person is NOTHING even close to Rick Pitino. A great deal of that is a good thing. The part that wins basketball games, not so much.
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2003
3,069
3,969
82
You're right. Pope was saying he's playing Garrison despite his backup being a better player. I don't know why it wasn't more obvious to me sooner.
Oh, I get what he said. He’s just inaccurate. Just reference the pic I posted and the explanation of the stat he referenced. Numbers don’t lie. Interpretations of said numbers can certainly be misrepresented though. That’s exactly what Pope did. Now, you can toss out some passive agressive comment, or simply try to refute the interpretation I gave. I’m good either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20MRoster

Eagles_Ball_69

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2003
3,069
3,969
82
If hes 2nd in our offense analytics, we're obviously using the wrong metrics. Hes awful.
He’s not. He’s first or second on the team in points per possession when he’s on the court. If you go to Sports Reference, you can see a game by game breakdown. He gets fat on the three cupcakes and because he plays with the starters in those games. That’s state isn’t a measure of “total offensive efficiency” for an individual.
 

sefus12

Heisman
Dec 22, 2007
6,988
18,709
103
Last year Garrison was crushed for shooting threes. He hasn't shot a single three this year so the goalpost had to be moved.

I'm MUCH more digsusted with all the air balls and threes taken quickly in the shot clock.
Be upset about air-balling threes, but Garrison’s criticism is well deserved this year. He looks both less skilled and less inspired on the court. Guy is getting way too many minutes to have as little positive impact as he’s having.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JPFisher

Kentucky15

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2013
2,033
4,223
108
Proves he doesn’t get it.

I’ve tried to support coach Pope from day one. Loved the hire. Guy said all the right things. Won a lot of big games last year (tied for most in school history, in fact). Got farther in the tourney than Cal had in years.

But to come out and praise BG after the debacle this season has been thus far? To call him an analytically efficient player?

If analytics say BG is good for this team, then I’m officially done giving analytics any credibility whatsoever. They are garbage. The kid’s effort sucks, his basketball IQ sucks, his decision making sucks, and his skillset for a guy with his body is mediocre.

I understand a coach not wanting to publicly dog a player, but to heap praise on him the way Pope did today… it makes me realize all the people who pejoratively called him a “girl dad” may have sadly been right. This kid BG needs a knot jerked in his ***, not told how well-conditioned and efficient he is. Really disheartening to read Pope’s quotes today.

It’s been said especially in baseball. We’ve seen it ruin many good teams. “Analytics” has no pulse of reality. It says nothing about the future. You must have human decisions made in real time. Analytics are meant for a purpose but making full blown decisions around your entire program isn’t it.

BG is a great example. On the court he’s awful. On a piece of paper he’s okay. He’s not okay he’s terrible. This is not algebra. This is human, and baseball has been totally ruined by head offices demanding coaches play what the numbers bear out. Then they stick with a pitcher who’s trash that day because the math says he needs to throw. I’ve seen my team absolutely tank since this has taken place.

You need the human eye and human emotion to understand what needs to be done. If Mark thinks he’s going to read a piece of paper and it’ll tell him how to coach? He won’t make it here long at all.

“Anal”lytics do not measure every single step a player makes to understand what’s going on. Math dorks have ruined sports. “Analytics” told Mark this is a dynamite team that crunches his numbers. Well, looks like analytics don’t show half of what is real here.
 

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
5,928
14,586
78
It’s been said especially in baseball. We’ve seen it ruin many good teams. “Analytics” has no pulse of reality. It says nothing about the future. You must have human decisions made in real time. Analytics are meant for a purpose but making full blown decisions around your entire program isn’t it.

BG is a great example. On the court he’s awful. On a piece of paper he’s okay. He’s not okay he’s terrible. This is not algebra. This is human, and baseball has been totally ruined by head offices demanding coaches play what the numbers bear out. Then they stick with a pitcher who’s trash that day because the math says he needs to throw. I’ve seen my team absolutely tank since this has taken place.

You need the human eye and human emotion to understand what needs to be done. If Mark thinks he’s going to read a piece of paper and it’ll tell him how to coach? He won’t make it here long at all.

“Anal”lytics do not measure every single step a player makes to understand what’s going on. Math dorks have ruined sports. “Analytics” told Mark this is a dynamite team that crunches his numbers. Well, looks like analytics don’t show half of what is real here.
Pope has to stop spending so much on analytics and he needs to look in the mirror and figure out what he’s doing wrong recruiting. He’s missing on way to many players to be successful here.
 

Kentucky15

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2013
2,033
4,223
108
Maybe that’s another problem and why Mark is looking lost. The math tells him this isn’t possible and he doesn’t understand it. Quit looking at that, coach the team. Throw the math away. Watch the court. Call Pitino. Do something but quit looking at those stupid numbers.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
49,308
68,572
113
I agree that his defense is not good. I have a post from a few weeks that if he's our starting C for this year, this team is going nowhere. I just feel like he's getting kicked while he's down.
Honestly, I haven't seen anyone say anything that was untrue. Most of the criticism is pretty close to what you just said.
Keep in mind, these dudes are making millions, because they are at UK and the money is available.
That money is available partly because the fanbase is what it is. If you're going to take that money, you really need to perform. These guys are pro athletes now, not unpaid college kids.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
49,308
68,572
113
Pope has to stop spending so much on analytics and he needs to look in the mirror and figure out what he’s doing wrong recruiting. He’s missing on way to many players to be successful here.
Thing is, Pope had to overlook so much data and dig very hard to find numbers that sorta made BG look like he deserved praise, but even then, he had to cover one eye and squint with the other.

Then, he pissed on us in the presser and told us it was raining.

I know why he did it, but after these two blowouts and seeing the lack of effort, he has to sack up and call a spade a spade.
 

cdbearde_rivals384606

All-American
Mar 9, 2017
4,768
8,923
113
Honestly, I haven't seen anyone say anything that was untrue. Most of the criticism is pretty close to what you just said.
Keep in mind, these dudes are making millions, because they are at UK and the money is available.
That money is available partly because the fanbase is what it is. If you're going to take that money, you really need to perform. These guys are pro athletes now, not unpaid college kids.
Jeff, I don't post much on here, and if you are who I think you are, you know of me, a simple man. ;)
But Mark is facing some tuff times at the present. But do you think maybe he was using some reverse psychology to fire him and other players up?
Who knows, but times are bad now, we can only hope he gets it turned around. (y)(y)
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFuqua and kyjeff1
Jul 30, 2024
4,623
8,424
113
Personally speaking, id like to be honest. All I talked about all summer was how much improved Brandon Garrison was gonna be. No greater evaluation miss than that one. Spent a many hour debating intensely with Eagles Ball on that one. I might have gotten him on the Collin Chandler deal, but I’d sure like to have my time back that I spent hyping up this failure of a “second year Brandon Garrison.” I can handle mistakes, but not lack of effort. I can’t sell my stock fast enough and I don’t say it with pride. I’d sure love for the kid to figure out how his head can be surgically removed from his own anus and we see something resembling a useful player.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
49,308
68,572
113
Jeff, I don't post much on here, and if you are who I think you are, you know of me, a simple man. ;)
But Mark is facing some tuff times at the present. But do you think maybe he was using some reverse psychology to fire him and other players up?
Who knows, but times are bad now, we can only hope he gets it turned around. (y)(y)
Yeah, I do think Mark is trying to talk to BG through the media. It’s really the only thing thst makes sense.

However, he painted himself into a corner, because now, after those comments, he has to play BG, because if he cuts his minutes, everyone, including BG, will know he was blowing smoke.

Mark wanted this. He knew this wasn't going to be easy and there will be many more times like this, so he needs to get it together and handle it.

But if he wants to fix this, he's going to have to make some tough decisions and some guys won't like those decisions.

Or, he can just keep on doing what he's doing and not hurt players feelings. I don't think this is a good idea, but it's ones Pope might go with.
 

Eagles_Ball_69

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2003
3,069
3,969
82
Personally speaking, id like to be honest. All I talked about all summer was how much improved Brandon Garrison was gonna be. No greater evaluation miss than that one. Spent a many hour debating intensely with Eagles Ball on that one. I might have gotten him on the Collin Chandler deal, but I’d sure like to have my time back that I spent hyping up this failure of a “second year Brandon Garrison.” I can handle mistakes, but not lack of effort. I can’t sell my stock fast enough and I don’t say it with pride. I’d sure love for the kid to figure out how his head can be surgically removed from his own anus and we see something resembling a useful player.
I’ll admit to being wrong on Chandler if it makes you feel better. 😂
 

Phil_The_Music2

Heisman
Nov 29, 2010
3,075
12,536
113
Personally speaking, id like to be honest. All I talked about all summer was how much improved Brandon Garrison was gonna be. No greater evaluation miss than that one. Spent a many hour debating intensely with Eagles Ball on that one. I might have gotten him on the Collin Chandler deal, but I’d sure like to have my time back that I spent hyping up this failure of a “second year Brandon Garrison.” I can handle mistakes, but not lack of effort. I can’t sell my stock fast enough and I don’t say it with pride. I’d sure love for the kid to figure out how his head can be surgically removed from his own anus and we see something resembling a useful player.
None of our returners except for Chandler have improved. In fact, they all seem worse. That may be the biggest surprise, and concern, for me.
 

Kentucky15

All-Conference
Mar 29, 2013
2,033
4,223
108
Pope has to justify overpaying him $2-3 million in NIL.

If Pope paid him that kind of money, I can’t support him as coach. And I’ve given everything I have to try and wish this through. I’ve gone full support mode. Had I been AD and seen that kind of money for Garrison, I’d have put a stop to it immediately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMR1987

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,441
11,919
113
I have a feeling Pitino will jerk a knot in Pope's tail after the St. John's game. Win or lose. One more sage lesson from the old coach.

"Use your f***in eyes when the numbers lie to you."

The fact that we're even using analytics this early in the season is concerning. Central Limit Theorem is taught in every stats class for a reason. Sure, there are stats that can account for small sample sizes, but when the eyeball test is telling us that no, not everything is hunky dory, it gets concerning.

I'm still on the Pope train, but he's got to understand that this cutesy stuff gets old when we're losing. I know he cares about the program, but fans want results, not stats.

Cal didn't use any analytics and just went off of handlers and vibes. Pope might rely on analytics too much. Pope needs to find a happy medium if he wants to succeed. He's talked about finding that happy medium before, too.
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
46,269
68,459
113
I have a feeling Pitino will jerk a knot in Pope's tail after the St. John's game. Win or lose. One more sage lesson from the old coach.

"Use your f***in eyes when the numbers lie to you."

The fact that we're even using analytics this early in the season is concerning. Central Limit Theorem is taught in every stats class for a reason. Sure, there are stats that can account for small sample sizes, but when the eyeball test is telling us that no, not everything is hunky dory, it gets concerning.

I'm still on the Pope train, but he's got to understand that this cutesy stuff gets old when we're losing. I know he cares about the program, but fans want results, not stats.

Cal didn't use any analytics and just went off of handlers and vibes. Pope might rely on analytics too much. Pope needs to find a happy medium if he wants to succeed. He's talked about finding that happy medium before, too.

as a man of faith and science I’m all about using numbers. But my eyes are also a factor.
Had a boss do this to me in sales once. Said we weren’t busy because we had only done X amount of dollars. Raked me over the coals for not getting other things done that day. I said look at the transactions. It was double our usual amount just a bunch of small stuff.

He shut up real quick. Sorry. My numbers told the truth. Yours didn’t.

And in basketball the ultimate number truth is the W-L column and the scoreboard.
 

AllBall

All-Conference
May 5, 2015
3,871
4,670
93
Garrison does have the second offensive rating on the team. It’s by and large due to his TS%. Basically, he takes very few bad shots.

Offensive rating doesn’t have anything to say about what he does in defense.
Anybody can put up #'s to boost analytics against Athletes in Action. What did he do against UL or Mich St? Nothing on offense or defense.
 

AllBall

All-Conference
May 5, 2015
3,871
4,670
93
He isn't the best they've got. Pope referenced his 1.5 points per possession. That's a stat that only measures OFFENSE and doesn't factor in the strength of the opponent. Translation...Garrison has "feasted" offensively against the three crappy teams they've played. And, btw, that doesn't mean Garrison averages 1.5 points per possession, that means the TEAM averages 1.5 points per possession while he's on the court. It's an outdated stat when measuring individual performance. Heavily skewed by his playing with starters and getting fat playing bad teams. Let alone doesn't show a thing about defense.
^^^This^^^ I've been screaming it from the Appalachian mountain tops and posting it on every video and message board.
 

KYWC36

All-Conference
Jul 11, 2013
1,150
1,681
113
Proves he doesn’t get it.

I’ve tried to support coach Pope from day one. Loved the hire. Guy said all the right things. Won a lot of big games last year (tied for most in school history, in fact). Got farther in the tourney than Cal had in years.

But to come out and praise BG after the debacle this season has been thus far? To call him an analytically efficient player?

If analytics say BG is good for this team, then I’m officially done giving analytics any credibility whatsoever. They are garbage. The kid’s effort sucks, his basketball IQ sucks, his decision making sucks, and his skillset for a guy with his body is mediocre.

I understand a coach not wanting to publicly dog a player, but to heap praise on him the way Pope did today… it makes me realize all the people who pejoratively called him a “girl dad” may have sadly been right. This kid BG needs a knot jerked in his ***, not told how well-conditioned and efficient he is. Really disheartening to read Pope’s quotes today.
I don't think that is a fair assessment. We aren't entitled to his dismantling. I think Pope did what a coach should do to the public, which is at the very least, present a united front. Public embarrassment wont help the situation
 
  • Like
Reactions: Midway Cat

Crestcat

Junior
Sep 5, 2025
150
275
63
I don't know about this fancy number stuff but the old fashioned pts, and rebounds says to me that Mareno is producing more in less time. One needs more time and one needs less.