Portal PG's comparison

Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
Can't compare their defense statistically, and to me that may be the most important trait for that position.
But still:

Name (Yrs remain) school, Ht Wt, Pt, Reb, Ast, TO, Stl+Blk (Stocks), FG%, 3pt% 3pt/gm, FT%
Dent (1) NM, 6'2 185, 20.4, 2.3, 6.4, 3.1, 1.4+0.9 (2.3), 49.0%, 40.9% 0.9, 78.4%
Agbim (1) Wyoming, 6'3 180, 17.6, 3.2, 3.4, 2.2, 1.1+0.3 (1.4), 46.9%, 43.7% 2.8, 78.5% (listed as SG though, and committed to Baylor)
Peterson (1) ETSU, 6'1 190, 19.5, 4.5, 3.7, 2.2, 2.0+0.2 (2.2), 46.8%, 42.2% 2.7, 73.3%
Thomas (2) UNLV, 6'1 185, 15.6, 2.0, 4.7, 1.9, 0.7+0.1 (0.8), 41.3%, 35.3% 0.9, 72.1%

Not yet in portal, but could go in:
Thorton (1) Ohio St, 6'2 215, 17.7, 3.4, 4.6, 1.5, 1.1+0.1 (1.2), 50.1%, 42.4% 1.8, 85.3%
Smith (1) Purdue, 6'0 175, 16.0, 4.5, 8.5, 3.0, 2.2+0.2 (2.4), 43.0%, 38.5% 2.3, 83.0%
Fears (2) Mich. St, 6'2, 190, 7.4, 2.1, 5.4, 2.0, 1.1+0.2 (1.3), 40.6%, 36.1% 0.4, 74.3%
Odum (1) Pepperdine, 6'1 160, 13.1, 3.2, 7.5, 2.6, 1.2+0.0 (1.2), 45.2%, 37.9% 1.7, 79.3%
Smith (1) Dayton, 6'0 175, 10.4, 2.9, 5.3, 2.1, 1.0+0.0 (1.0), 42.4%, 38.3% 0.9, 71.7%

(Stirtz has already committed to follow his coach to Iowa)
 
Last edited:

G-PIP

All-American
Mar 14, 2014
5,286
5,964
0
I think Agbim has already committed (Baylor?). Also, I don't love the lower FG% with some of these guys.
 

Anon1679859502

All-American
Jun 28, 2015
4,660
8,770
113
Surprised that Duke isn’t being thrown in the around with Smith, since everyone seems to think he will be the top point guard once he’s in the portal
 
Jul 26, 2003
21,180
11,162
0
Can't compare their defense statistically, and to me that may be the most important trait for that position.
But still:

Name (Yrs remain) school, Ht Wt, Pt, Reb, Ast, TO, Stl+Blk (Stocks), FG%, 3pt% 3pt/gm, FT%
Dent (1) NM, 6'2 185, 20.4, 2.3, 6.4, 3.1, 1.4+0.9 (2.3), 49.0%, 40.9% 0.9, 78.4%
Agbim (1) Wyoming, 6'3 180, 17.6, 3.2, 3.4, 2.2, 1.1+0.3 (1.4), 46.9%, 43.7% 2.8, 78.5% (listed as SG though)
Peterson (1) ETSU, 6'1 190, 19.5, 4.5, 3.7, 2.2, 2.0+0.2 (2.2), 46.8%, 42.2% 2.7, 73.3%
Thomas (2) UNLV, 6'1 185, 15.6, 2.0, 4.7, 1.9, 0.7+0.1 (0.8), 41.3%, 35.3% 0.9, 72.1%

Not yet in portal, but could go in:
Thorton (1) Ohio St, 6'2 215, 17.7, 3.4, 4.6, 1.5, 1.1+0.1 (1.2), 50.1%, 42.4% 1.8, 85.3%
Smith (1) Purdue, 6'0 175, 16.0, 4.5, 8.5, 3.0, 2.2+0.2 (2.4), 43.0%, 38.5% 2.3, 83.0%
Fears (2) Mich. St, 6'2, 190, 7.4, 2.1, 5.4, 2.0, 1.1+0.2 (1.3), 40.6%, 36.1% 0.4, 74.3%
Odum (1) Pepperdine, 6'1 160, 13.1, 3.2, 7.5, 2.6, 1.2+0.0 (1.2), 45.2%, 37.9% 1.7, 79.3%
Smith (1) Dayton, 6'0 175, 10.4, 2.9, 5.3, 2.1, 1.0+0.0 (1.0), 42.4%, 38.3% 0.9, 71.7%

(Stirtz has already committed to follow his coach to Iowa)
Speed also to consider as Dent is said to be one of the very fastest players in the land with the ball in his hands.
 

bnewt

Heisman
May 29, 2001
8,853
11,022
113
has any one watched Thomas play? Can he create his own shot and shots for others?
 

cats#1again

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2011
8,011
4,587
0
I think Agbim has already committed (Baylor?). Also, I don't love the lower FG% with some of these guys.
Majority of the shots they are taking are from three. Mid to low 40% for a pg fg isn't bad really.
As we've seen with Butler. You need a strong leader that can shoot when needed. I don't want my pg being the top scoring option
 

G-PIP

All-American
Mar 14, 2014
5,286
5,964
0
Majority of the shots they are taking are from three. Mid to low 40% for a pg fg isn't bad really.
As we've seen with Butler. You need a strong leader that can shoot when needed. I don't want my pg being the top scoring option
Sure, I can agree with wanting a strong leader, etc. But I can't agree with low 40% FG% being nothing to worry about. That portends an underlying issue, which may be poor shot selection, inability to finish, etc. And while a player taking a high amount of his shots from 3pt. range will tend to pull down overall FG% some, I don't think that's a sufficient excuse. On the other hand, a professional coach/coaching staff actually seeing and analyzing a player can trump statistics. So, if Pope & the guys like a player that's good enough for me to put my concerns aside.
 

catsfanbgky

All-American
Oct 18, 2006
18,901
7,622
0
Majority of the shots they are taking are from three. Mid to low 40% for a pg fg isn't bad really.
As we've seen with Butler. You need a strong leader that can shoot when needed. I don't want my pg being the top scoring option
They have separate shooting %s for 2s and 3s. At least Sports Reference the site I use does. It shows the # of 2s taken and made, # of 3s taken and made, # of ft's taken and made. Also have a average taken and made per game for all 3. The site is analytics persons dream. Advance stats galore. Sportsreference.com. I just google players name stats, then find sports reference and go to reading. Stathead is really cool feature they have.
 

cats#1again

All-Conference
Nov 27, 2011
8,011
4,587
0
They have separate shooting %s for 2s and 3s. At least Sports Reference the site I use does. It shows the # of 2s taken and made, # of 3s taken and made, # of ft's taken and made. Also have a average taken and made per game for all 3. The site is analytics persons dream. Advance stats galore. Sportsreference.com. I just google players name stats, then find sports reference and go to reading. Stathead is really cool feature they have.
I'm aware they have separate categories to show how many 3's are taken but overall percentage is both 2 point fg and 3 point fg
 
Jan 10, 2015
18,393
30,497
62
Where did you see this at? I would pay that for Braden smith. Absolutely I would.
I don't get it in todays game in order to have those type of WINNING players we might have to spend a little bit of money to get those type of guys. I hate it just like the rest of the older generation but it is what it is now! Dude has been to the Championship game just like Butler and Purdue is still in it this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Panthur