Possible Bipartisan Border Plan

mule_eer

Freshman
May 6, 2002
20,439
59
48
The Scientific American article is a few months old, but I heard an interview with the President of Purdue U (former Indiana governor) who wrote an oped in the Washington Post about this study recently. It seems like it should at least be worth a look. The basic idea is to set up wind and solar farms along the border, with some agricultural and business zones as well. Some of the generated power would be used to desalinate water from the Pacific and the Gulf to be used for some of the industry and agriculture. Parts of the security would be managed by the private industry security set up. I'm not saying it would definitely work, but it is something to investigate. That reduces the burden of BP agents, adds infrastructure and jobs on both sides of the border, and this might be a wall that Mexico would help finance given the added industrial and agricultural base for them. I skipped the oped, but the link is for the SA article.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...he-border-wall-with-an-energy-water-corridor/
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,295
6,999
113
The Scientific American article is a few months old, but I heard an interview with the President of Purdue U (former Indiana governor) who wrote an oped in the Washington Post about this study recently. It seems like it should at least be worth a look. The basic idea is to set up wind and solar farms along the border, with some agricultural and business zones as well. Some of the generated power would be used to desalinate water from the Pacific and the Gulf to be used for some of the industry and agriculture. Parts of the security would be managed by the private industry security set up. I'm not saying it would definitely work, but it is something to investigate. That reduces the burden of BP agents, adds infrastructure and jobs on both sides of the border, and this might be a wall that Mexico would help finance given the added industrial and agricultural base for them. I skipped the oped, but the link is for the SA article.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...he-border-wall-with-an-energy-water-corridor/
Machine gun nests are much easier to maintain and more economical. Bury them where they fall.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
283
83
This would be a disaster for Team Trump as they need this divisive issue to lie about and stir up the hate with.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
This would be a disaster for Team Trump as they need this divisive issue to lie about and stir up the hate with.
That is ridiculous. It would be a huge win for Trump
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,295
6,999
113
Gee....why can't there be a bipartisan compromise on immigration? Because one side is ****ing nuts.
cheaper than going through all this bull ****. You really only need to shoot a few a day, they'll quit breaking the law
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,310
2,385
113
This would be a disaster for Team Trump as they need this divisive issue to lie about and stir up the hate with.
Please...its been an issue for generations, every president on both sides has flapped there lieing lips about it .....all ya have to do is look up Obama's words on it
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,310
2,385
113
The Scientific American article is a few months old, but I heard an interview with the President of Purdue U (former Indiana governor) who wrote an oped in the Washington Post about this study recently. It seems like it should at least be worth a look. The basic idea is to set up wind and solar farms along the border, with some agricultural and business zones as well. Some of the generated power would be used to desalinate water from the Pacific and the Gulf to be used for some of the industry and agriculture. Parts of the security would be managed by the private industry security set up. I'm not saying it would definitely work, but it is something to investigate. That reduces the burden of BP agents, adds infrastructure and jobs on both sides of the border, and this might be a wall that Mexico would help finance given the added industrial and agricultural base for them. I skipped the oped, but the link is for the SA article.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...he-border-wall-with-an-energy-water-corridor/
Dont know if that would work , but the job creation would be nice ...border security should be bipartisan & should not be an issue...at around 4 million a year just in tax fraud illegal immigrants are raping our country
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
283
83
Please...its been an issue for generations, every president on both sides has flapped there lieing lips about it .....all ya have to do is look up Obama's words on it
The plan in the OP's article is too thoughtful, won't happen.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Dont know if that would work , but the job creation would be nice ...border security should be bipartisan & should not be an issue...at around 4 million a year just in tax fraud illegal immigrants are raping our country
Hopefully no one builds a world wide web of tubes so that "illegals" can file fraudulent tax returns from outside the US. Gasp.

Border security IS a bipartisan. And both parties use extreme language to drum up their rubes.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
The Scientific American article is a few months old, but I heard an interview with the President of Purdue U (former Indiana governor) who wrote an oped in the Washington Post about this study recently. It seems like it should at least be worth a look. The basic idea is to set up wind and solar farms along the border, with some agricultural and business zones as well. Some of the generated power would be used to desalinate water from the Pacific and the Gulf to be used for some of the industry and agriculture. Parts of the security would be managed by the private industry security set up. I'm not saying it would definitely work, but it is something to investigate. That reduces the burden of BP agents, adds infrastructure and jobs on both sides of the border, and this might be a wall that Mexico would help finance given the added industrial and agricultural base for them. I skipped the oped, but the link is for the SA article.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.co...he-border-wall-with-an-energy-water-corridor/

I like the idea that it recognizes our border needs to be enforced. It also tacitly admits Americans fundamentally are NOT opposed to migrant workers as long as they follow a legal process coming here. We're against ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. This deserves more attention.

Good post mule!
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,310
2,385
113
Hopefully no one builds a world wide web of tubes so that "illegals" can file fraudulent tax returns from outside the US. Gasp.

Border security IS a bipartisan. And both parties use extreme language to drum up their rubes.
Im sure they can do it thru the web ...but how much is done at h&r block ..
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
Please...its been an issue for generations, every president on both sides has flapped there lieing lips about it .....all ya have to do is look up Obama's words on it

Democrats easily forget how they voted for a wall before they voted against it.[winking]
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Im sure they can do it thru the web ...but how much is done at h&r block ..
I'll see if I can find you an answer, but I'd bet the overwhelming majority of the fraud occurs via free online filing programs. Also, the IRS is MUCH better at detecting these now.