I would have no problem bringing someone like Tressel in next year after the season. I was simply responding to the guy that said he wanted Tressel 3 years ago. You and I both know that was not happening because of the show cause. You and I also both know that Stoops is around for at least one more year. After the Vandy game, I started a thread asking people what they would do knowing Stoops and Mitch werent going anywhere. I suggested changing coordinators after the season, but people want to talk about bringing in Les Miles, Chip Kelly, etc. So, here are my solutions to the program that I have posted a number of times through the years:
1. We have to find something unique that defines our program from this point forward. Something that when Kentucky football is brought up, people immediately go, "Oh yeah, that team with the ....". Think about how Oregon originally became known by their uniforms 20 years ago, and how Boise State started becoming a household name because of the blue turf. We have to find something that makes us unique and that no other school is doing.
2. We have to find an offensive coordinator that runs a unique offense. People don't want to hear this, but maybe it is the route that Navy and GaTech. Something an SEC team would only see once a year. When Mumme started, his offense was unique (and we had the perfect QB to run ut( and it was succesful. Problem is that it wasn't so unique after a few years as other teams started to do it. I can tell you this, running a pro style offense will never work here.
3. We have to consistently be the 4th best recruitng class in the East behind Floridau, Tennessee and Georgia. This would put us ahead of South Carolina, Vandy, Mizzou and Mississippi State on an annual basis. To know that we will have more talent on the field than 8 of our opponants every year, would be a good feeling.
4. We have to continually update facilities. You can't wait 15 years between significant upgrades, remodels, expansions, etc. You do this by appeasing the University administrators and get the ability to use significant bond debt when needed by agreeing to put 60 million towards academic buildings after the previous $60 million of bond debt runs out (aka Science Building athletics is funding).
IMO, if those 4 things are done, we can have a successful program.