1-4, I mostly agree. I'm not certain about 3. I think she is better at CYA than Comey.
5, you shouldn't be able to speak on yet. This report was about Hillbag's email server, and barely mentions Trump.
Pre-release leaks
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
1-4, I mostly agree. I'm not certain about 3. I think she is better at CYA than Comey.
5, you shouldn't be able to speak on yet. This report was about Hillbag's email server, and barely mentions Trump.
If the FISA warrant was based on the "fake dossier" and some in the FBI are politically corrupt and politically motivated, why does it even continue?
Is it continuing?
All he's done is your 18 indictments and guilt pleas, none of which are due to... re-wording a bit because of Manafort... anything to do with Trump campaign activities conspiring with Russia to impact the election, which is what the investigation's stated goal is. He does like indicting Manafort, though.
I thought Lynch’s bias would be a slam dunk....I don’t think it’s as clear as that, imo.
For the FOIA for the emails related to the tarmac meeting to only be about trying to bury that it happened, and no thought of an investigation... it's a slam dunk. Remember, things have been withheld from the report due to impending prosecution. This makes the "we will stop him" text all the more interesting.
If true it is a smart man becausr someone has been setting him up to take the tide a whole now.
What law did he "brake"? The WVU College of Lawl, Criminal Law class is interested in hearing your response. I'll share with the class when you are done and we can critique your answer. Thanks in advance.
Oh, about the classified info. I didn't find the question on youtube yet, so here's the transcript:
Senator Kennedy: Your index does it contain or discuss an email that refers to a conversation allegedly between Attorney General Lynch and a person by the name of Amanda Renteria?
Inspector General Horowitz: I’m not sure what I can say about that publicly so would ask you if I can get back to you.
NY Post: New holes in Loretta Lynch’s story on the Hillary probe
link
"The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton’s campaign she wouldn’t let FBI agents “go too far” in probing the former secretary of state.
Lynch’s lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff “ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,” who headed Clinton’s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify."
Senator Kennedy: Your index does it contain or discuss an email that refers to a conversation allegedly between Attorney General Lynch and a person by the name of Amanda Renteria?
Inspector General Horowitz: I’m not sure what I can say about that publicly so would ask you if I can get back to you.
NY Post: New holes in Loretta Lynch’s story on the Hillary probe
link
"The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton’s campaign she wouldn’t let FBI agents “go too far” in probing the former secretary of state.
Lynch’s lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff “ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,” who headed Clinton’s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify."
"Brake"? Who do you think you're talking to, Keyser? Go figure out what color you are.
It brakes you that we point out how dumb you are.Reading this board is like watching these guys.
I love it!!!!
Oh how funny it is to watch the Trump haters complain about the slow release of a report they dont want to see.
If the Counter intelligence Investigations would have been ran out of a local U.S. Attorney's and FBI office instead of the head shed it would have been shut down immediately. Head Shed to Special Counsel. It's almost if it was planned. :wink:
How many other signatures with James Comey's name on FISA Court Affidavits that don't include Donald Trump"s political circle do you think exists since Comey became FBI director ? A very uncomfortable question that I promise that will be asked.
Probably at least as many as there were people that Comey and crew needed to keep an eye on for whatever reason. Id guess a few reporters. Id guess a few people around Trumps advisors. Probably someone close to every senator on the big committees.
Lol Exactly .... for others that don't understand how it works Comey and individuals that work in the headquarters buildings dont fill out warrants. Christopher Wray will never fill out a warrant as the FBI Director. All investigations are given to local field offices that work with a U.S. Attorney's Office.
Good luck James Comey and other Headquarters Supervisors explaining why the FISA warrants you have signed off on since 2013 only involve political enemies of the party in power.
ITT right wingers think there is a deep state in the intelligence agencies when most of the leadership are Republicans. LOL!
You guys have went bat-**** crazy. You believe a habitual liar. LMAO!
You guys have went bat-**** crazy. You believe a habitual liar. LMAO!
YOU believed Trump stole the '16 election by "colluding" with Russians! We all now see YOU were bat-sh*t crazy and making matters worse YOU still believe it! :scream:
In this post, the dumbest motherfuker on the internet ignores reality because he doesnt realize just how dumb he ism
We have all established recently that "deep state" is a salacious term used to describe unelected government employees that abuse their authority. Hence why Congress your elected officials created the Federal Inspector General Office to investigate and hold them accountable. Inspector Generals then make criminal referrals to the Department of Justice to assign to U.S. Attorney's for prosecution. Seriously this **** isn't that hard to understand. John Huber and John Durham say hi.
Leftists deny the "deep state" exists similar to how they deny abortion is murder...or even "evil". To them there is no such thing. Same thing with the "deep state".
Ask a Leftist what's "evil"? They literally will struggle to define it, because then they may be forced to admit there is God which of course is also non existent in their lexicon.
So they'll answer that question with something like "right wing nut jobs who vote for Trump are evil"
(evil is anything that upsets Leftists) [winking]
Hey country are you still upset over how Trump "tanked" the stock market and ruined all of your investments?
I'm still trying to figure out why any market activity bothers country anyway? No investments! What does country care about the damn stock market?
He lost 90k last year when the.market dropped. He never mentioned how much he made when it rebounded but dont hurt his brain.
I'm not sure about that Dave. If he lost it, he sure as Hell didn't claim it! He told the board he didn't itemize his returns this year. I found that somewhat shocking, considering he claims he posted 250K in income! I don't know anyone who earns that much in a year and has no investments to claim dividend income or capital gains losses on a schedule B or D itemized tax return?
Last edited:
Pretty sure he was talking about some sort of 401k or similar.I'm not sure about that Dave. If he lost it, he sure as Hell didn't claim it! He told the board he didn't itemize his returns this year. I found that somewhat shocking, considering he claims he posted 250K in income! I don't know anyone who earns that much in a year and has no investments to claim dividend income or capital gains losses on a schedule D itemized tax return?