PSU Offense impressive…Solid D

SBP

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
4,732
4,648
0
Man… guard play, passing, 3’s, screens, inside out…

Experience showing…
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
28,308
26,931
113
Fun team to watch. Imagine playing in big ten semi final I’d be on edge watching one of these games with Rutgers playing!
 

koko2315

All-Conference
Aug 12, 2007
1,115
1,097
0
Strengthens our resume. And I think will start putting Shrewsbury out there with more opportunities next season
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletDave

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
23,905
37,580
113
Amazing how fans can interpret what is good vs what isn't

Indiana is very passive and slow defensively.

Indiana never traps Pickett and let's him dictate the entire tempo of the game.

Indiana never drives the ball at the smaller guards of PSU, to make them work on defense.

I don't think Indiana has come close to any deflections, steals.

If you let a jump shooting team coast on defense, never make them play defense inside the paint, you might as well make it a jump shooting contest.

Indiana remains one of the oddest looking rosters in the B1G. I could easily make a case that they have 3 better players/athletes on their bench that don't get enough minutes. And it took Xavier Johnson breaking his foot, for them to force the better guard, Hood-Schifino into the lineup.

If PSU draws a matchup with anyone with wings who are athletic, and someone respectable at the 5 position to shut down the Pickett nonsense in the paint, they're going out early in the NCAAs (1 & done).
 
  • Like
Reactions: RW90 and newell138

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,846
16,117
0
Strengthens our resume. And I think will start putting Shrewsbury out there with more opportunities next season
Definitely and can see him looking elsewhere since I think they lose a lot after this year. Have to cash in when you can.
 
Nov 15, 2001
15,044
15,615
0
That’s just it, they spread the floor and let Adrian Dantley dominate inside (and I don’t think he’s as big as he was). You also can’t leave those shooters. Shutting Pickett down is obviously key. We did a great job of that in the 2nd half of our game with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBP

RutgersRaRa

Heisman
Mar 21, 2011
19,087
31,436
113
My delicate psyche and I would feel so much better if OP removed the exclamation mark from the thread title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBP

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Perception wise PSU was previously looked at as a bubble team but now those 2 wins over them look more impressive especially since PSU doesn't have the brand name recognition of other B1G schools. Can't ignore how good those 2 wins were now. We dominated them in 3 out of 4 halves too
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
28,308
26,931
113
Amazing how fans can interpret what is good vs what isn't

Indiana is very passive and slow defensively.

Indiana never traps Pickett and let's him dictate the entire tempo of the game.

Indiana never drives the ball at the smaller guards of PSU, to make them work on defense.

I don't think Indiana has come close to any deflections, steals.

If you let a jump shooting team coast on defense, never make them play defense inside the paint, you might as well make it a jump shooting contest.

Indiana remains one of the oddest looking rosters in the B1G. I could easily make a case that they have 3 better players/athletes on their bench that don't get enough minutes. And it took Xavier Johnson breaking his foot, for them to force the better guard, Hood-Schifino into the lineup.

If PSU draws a matchup with anyone with wings who are athletic, and someone respectable at the 5 position to shut down the Pickett nonsense in the paint, they're going out early in the NCAAs (1 & done).
The opponent you described >>> every big ten team lol

Which we typically see on display every March these days
 

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
23,905
37,580
113
If Painter allows Pickett to dominate the ball for 10 to 15 seconds per possession, he will have a lot of explaining to do.

I'm 99% certain Matt Painter is a significantly better coach than Indiana HC Mike Woodson. I don't see any path for PSU beating Purdue, unless Edey doesn't get off the team bus to United Center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LOU-RU85 and SBP

NewJerseyHawk

Heisman
Jan 11, 2007
23,905
37,580
113
The opponent you described >>> every big ten team lol

Which we typically see on display every March these days

This PSU stuff is extremely odd....I think fans are in love with teams who take a lot of 3s....they were on life support at home vs Maryland down 10 with under 5 minutes to go and the Terps collapsed. Maybe they would have survived and still made it to the B1G title game anyway, but I don't think they're in the field if Maryland doesn't fall apart.

They've seized the opportunity of drawing Brad Underwood (bad coach), Northwestern (good coach, limited size/athletes) and Mike Woodson (bad coach, poor use of depth/roster).

If they drew any other combination of teams, they'd be 1 & done in Chicago.....
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
28,308
26,931
113
This PSU stuff is extremely odd....I think fans are in love with teams who take a lot of 3s....they were on life support at home vs Maryland down 10 with under 5 minutes to go and the Terps collapsed. Maybe they would have survived and still made it to the B1G title game anyway, but I don't think they're in the field if Maryland doesn't fall apart.

They've seized the opportunity of drawing Brad Underwood (bad coach), Northwestern (good coach, limited size/athletes) and Mike Woodson (bad coach, poor use of depth/roster).

If they drew any other combination of teams, they'd be 1 & done in Chicago.....
Can’t take this seriously I’ll just exit this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers56_rivals

tjb_rivals53842

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
125
122
0
If PSU draws a matchup with anyone with wings who are athletic, and someone respectable at the 5 position to shut down the Pickett nonsense in the paint, they're going out early in the NCAAs (1 & done).
Lot of good stuff in there but this is one of two keys to playing Penn State:

1. If you have athletic guys in the wing who can get into the paint - not necessarily to score but to break down the defense - they’ve had trouble defending. They’ve changed some things up - I think stealing from Hoiberg. Zoning off the ball, etc.

2. The second thing is the way the game is called. If you’re allowed to bump, push and grab guys moving on the perimeter, it all falls apart. That’s why you, Wisconsin and, despite the two wins, NW were difficult matchups.

The hard hedge on the ball screen that you and NW employed was also very effective. Can’t understand why more teams haven’t done that.

You can’t double Pickett in the post. That’s why Underwood was crying for a rule change after every loss.

Edited to add: Also, a really favorable draw on the matchups, although didn’t expect Indiana to be as soft.
 
Last edited:

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,846
16,117
0
Lot of good stuff in there but this is one of two keys to playing Penn State:

1. If you have athletic guys in the wing who can get into the paint - not necessarily to score but to break down the defense - they’ve had trouble defending. They’ve changed some things up - I think stealing from Hoiberg. Zoning off the ball, etc.

2. The second thing is the way the game is called. If you’re allowed to bump, push and grab guys moving on the perimeter, it all falls apart. That’s why you, Wisconsin and, despite the two wins, NW were difficult matchups.

The hard hedge on the ball screen that you and NW employed was also very effective. Can’t understand why more teams haven’t done that.

You can’t double Pickett in the post. That’s why Underwood was crying for a rule change after every loss.

Edited to add: Also, a really favorable draw on the matchups, although didn’t expect Indiana to be as soft.
Good post for the most part, but No. 2 sounds like a homer excuse for losses. As for Indiana being soft, I thought they finally shed that tag as the season wore on, but they reverted back to it today.
 

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,771
5,959
113
We beat PSU twice and almost beat PU twice. Could have been us! Next year we can be the champion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RUTrack94

All-American
Nov 15, 2008
11,346
5,175
113
Other than the shower incident, damn jealous of Penn State.

RU has one title ever … and PSU waltzes to the final as a 10-seed. At least OSU lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsojo

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Can Purdue handle PSU from 3? It's almost crazy that nobody in this conference has a chance against Edey outside of Cliff. Maybe Dickinson?
That's more luck if PSU is on or not. Really it's about stopping Pickett though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh

Rokodesh

Heisman
Aug 30, 2007
15,450
12,016
73
That's more luck if PSU is on or not. Really it's about stopping Pickett though
True but they're playing with a ton of confidence now. Much different scoring in the post vs TJD, than against Edey, though.
 

RU84

All-Conference
May 6, 2003
1,417
1,308
48
This PSU stuff is extremely odd....I think fans are in love with teams who take a lot of 3s....they were on life support at home vs Maryland down 10 with under 5 minutes to go and the Terps collapsed. Maybe they would have survived and still made it to the B1G title game anyway, but I don't think they're in the field if Maryland doesn't fall apart.

They've seized the opportunity of drawing Brad Underwood (bad coach), Northwestern (good coach, limited size/athletes) and Mike Woodson (bad coach, poor use of depth/roster).

If they drew any other combination of teams, they'd be 1 & done in Chicago.....
Too bad RU didn't draw the same path as Penn St. RU defended Pickett well and held him below his average both games. The last game quite a bit below. Didn't allow him to operate in the paint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LOU-RU85 and SBP