Question for the future.......

AstroDog

Senior
Oct 5, 2022
1,298
844
113
Would you and your family/friends still support MSU football should we not be included in a 32-50 team Superconference (or something similar) as some have indicated could happen? Now, this doesn't mean we can't still play the BAMA's, UTs, OK, Texas's of the world, but they would be considered an OOC game for us should we decide to do it. I thought about this somewhat and feel, YES, I would support MSU football regardless of how we stacked up in a slightly secodary conference that still played for it's own title. And there would still be most of the same good teams on our schedule as normal. The odds of us ever winning a NC as it stands now is almost zero. Now..... the football-only SuperConference may never happen, but it could in some form. These next few years with all the expansion mania going on and the bowl realignments sure to follow, I think a SuperConference would take the top 8-10 SEC teams. Now, is probably the most critical time for MSU to have a stout AD to guide us and stand up for us. It IS going to be chaotic. Keenum will have a lot of pressure on him to make the right choice.
 
Nov 16, 2005
26,118
17,582
113
Would you and your family/friends still support MSU football should we not be included in a 32-50 team Superconference (or something similar) as some have indicated could happen? Now, this doesn't mean we can't still play the BAMA's, UTs, OK, Texas's of the world, but they would be considered an OOC game for us should we decide to do it. I thought about this somewhat and feel, YES, I would support MSU football regardless of how we stacked up in a slightly secodary conference that still played for it's own title. And there would still be most of the same good teams on our schedule as normal. The odds of us ever winning a NC as it stands now is almost zero. Now..... the football-only SuperConference may never happen, but it could in some form. These next few years with all the expansion mania going on and the bowl realignments sure to follow, I think a SuperConference would take the top 8-10 SEC teams. Now, is probably the most critical time for MSU to have a stout AD to guide us and stand up for us. It IS going to be chaotic. Keenum will have a lot of pressure on him to make the right choice.
Kermit GIF
 

BigDawg0074

Senior
Oct 12, 2016
1,366
716
113
I would probably stop watching college football altogether for the same reason I don’t watch NFL, MLB, or NHL. If I don’t have a dog in the hunt I’m not interested.
 

HotMop

All-American
May 8, 2006
7,073
5,080
113
Would you and your family/friends still support MSU football should we not be included in a 32-50 team Superconference (or something similar) as some have indicated could happen? Now, this doesn't mean we can't still play the BAMA's, UTs, OK, Texas's of the world, but they would be considered an OOC game for us should we decide to do it. I thought about this somewhat and feel, YES, I would support MSU football regardless of how we stacked up in a slightly secodary conference that still played for it's own title. And there would still be most of the same good teams on our schedule as normal. The odds of us ever winning a NC as it stands now is almost zero. Now..... the football-only SuperConference may never happen, but it could in some form. These next few years with all the expansion mania going on and the bowl realignments sure to follow, I think a SuperConference would take the top 8-10 SEC teams. Now, is probably the most critical time for MSU to have a stout AD to guide us and stand up for us. It IS going to be chaotic. Keenum will have a lot of pressure on him to make the right choice.
I wouldn't watch it for long. It'd be a horrible product.