Optimus Prime 4 said:
most companies would consider the pregnancy and child a pre-existing condition and not cover that, wouldn't they?
Ill plead ignorance on knowing ugly details of health insurance. My work's care seems to be awesome since i havent had any problems on coverage, so ive never looked into details of other plans.
Is what you are saying correct?...anyone verify this? I have heard once a woman is pregnant she is F'd(more than literally) in terms of healthcare coverage if she wants to get it on her own. But oddly enough,i dont spend my time combing thru policy legal speak to see if this is true for many companies.
And if a pregnancy is a pre-existing condition that wouldnt be covered, then what about diabetes? Someone can come into my insurance with both and be covered. Is that really not common?
Or is it commonly acceptedfor work subsidized insurance but not allowed for most individual insurance policies?
People in my company come in with families that have medical issues like hypertension, diabetes, history of seizures and they are fully covered...its nuts that they would not be covered elsewhere.
And yet in the end, forcing people to enter into the stream of commerce is not only notthe answer, but its a gross insult to our freedom...though that is what is going to happen.