The only way I can see it being a recruiting violation would be if he was acting as a third party (aka, Kenny Rogers - Cam Newton) in the recruiting process that I'm pretty sure the NCAA doesn't allow, anyway. So, back to my original question; is it a recruiting violation to provide complimentary services to De'Vinner? I mean, he seems so innocent:
"I had no idea what it was," De'Vinner said. "I Googled the address. He told me on Friday that when I got there it was taken care of, to go to the front desk and get the key. I was thinking I had to pay for it."
De'Vinner provided Yahoo! Sports with a copy of his hotel receipt for that trip which showed his room listed as "complimentary," with no charge. The only charge for his stay was a $55 cleaning fee, plus $4.40 in taxes on the cleaning charge. But De'Vinner said he never paid the cleaning fee and was never asked to pay it.
I guess I can't see what the big deal is about where he stayed, where he ate, and who paid for if it isn't a recruiting violation. If it is a recruiting violation, and he knew it, and he let it happen then he implicated himself in the process of clearing his name. Furthermore, he hurts the same person he says he is trying to protect. This guy sounds like a real gem.
Again, I'm not familiar with NCAA rules. Just trying to understand. I read a couple of articles on 3rd party recruiting, but neither of them were specific as to where the line is drawn.
Looks like you did the right thing keeping your distance from Chris Spencer's recruitment, Big D.