Read this grashopper: Tommy 17ing Amaker

[FreeDawg]

Why not? We've been turned down by everyone. He has improved every team he coached over time. Harvard has improved greatly. He had a #2 recruiting class at Seton Hall, he has been a coach at 2 major programs, and he's got a sweet 16. Maybe he has learned from previous mistakes. What say ye pack?

http://www.gocrimson.com/...bkb/coaches/amaker_tommy

<table class="wikitable"><tbody><tr><th>Season</th><th>Team</th><th>Overall</th><th>Conference</th><th>Standing</th><th>Postseason</th></tr><tr><td style="background:#dddddd; border-bottom: 2px solid #aaaaaa;" colspan="9" align="center">Seton Hall Pirates (Big East Conference) (1997–2001)</td></tr><tr><td>1997–98</td><td>Seton Hall</td><td>15–15</td><td>9–9</td><td>3rd (Seven)</td><td>NIT 1st Round</td></tr><tr><td>1998–99</td><td>Seton Hall</td><td>15–15</td><td>8–10</td><td>T–8th</td><td>NIT 1st Round</td></tr><tr><td>1999–00</td><td>Seton Hall</td><td>22–10</td><td>10–6</td><td>T–4th</td><td>NCAA Sweet 16</td></tr><tr><td>2000–01</td><td>Seton Hall</td><td>16–15</td><td>5–11</td><td>6th (West)</td><td>NIT 1st Round</td></tr><tr style="background:#fafafa; border-top: 2px solid #aaaaaa;"><td colspan="2" align="center">Seton Hall:</td><td>68–55</td><td>32–36</td><td colspan="5">
</td></tr><tr><td style="background:#dddddd; border-bottom: 2px solid #aaaaaa;" colspan="9" align="center">Michigan Wolverines (Big Ten Conference) (2001–2007)</td></tr><tr><td>2001–02</td><td>Michigan</td><td>11–18</td><td>5–11</td><td>T–8th</td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>2002–03</td><td>Michigan</td><td>17–13</td><td>10–6</td><td>T–3rd</td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>2003–04</td><td>Michigan</td><td>23–11</td><td>8–8</td><td>T–5th</td><td>NIT Champions</td></tr><tr><td>2004–05</td><td>Michigan</td><td>13–18</td><td>4–12</td><td>9th</td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>2005–06</td><td>Michigan</td><td>22–11</td><td>8–8</td><td>T-6th</td><td>NIT Runner-Up</td></tr><tr><td>2006–07</td><td>Michigan</td><td>22–13</td><td>8–8</td><td>T–7th</td><td>NIT 2nd Round</td></tr><tr style="background:#fafafa; border-top: 2px solid #aaaaaa;"><td colspan="2" align="center">Michigan:</td><td>108–84</td><td>43–53</td><td colspan="5">
</td></tr><tr><td style="background:#dddddd; border-bottom: 2px solid #aaaaaa;" colspan="9" align="center">Harvard Crimson (Ivy League) (2007–present)</td></tr><tr><td>2007–08</td><td>Harvard</td><td>8–22</td><td>3–11</td><td>T–6th</td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>2008–09</td><td>Harvard</td><td>14–14</td><td>6–8</td><td>T–6th</td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>2009–10</td><td>Harvard</td><td>21–7</td><td>10–4</td><td>3rd</td><td>CIT 1st Round</td></tr><tr style="background:#ffdd99"><td>2010–11</td><td>Harvard</td><td>23–7</td><td>12–2</td><td>T–1st</td><td>NIT 1st round</td></tr><tr style="background:#ffdd99"><td>2011–12</td><td>Harvard</td><td>26–5</td><td>12–2</td><td>1st</td><td>NCAA 2nd Round</td></tr><tr style="background:#fafafa; border-top: 2px solid #aaaaaa;"><td colspan="2" align="center">Harvard:</td><td>92–55</td><td>43–27</td><td colspan="5">
</td></tr><tr style="background:#dddddd"><td colspan="2" style="text-align:center">Total:</td><td>268–194</td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[QuaoarsKing]

What makes you think he could do better here than he did at Michigan, a program with a national title and multiple final fours?<div>
</div><div>And even if he did do a little bit better (say 2 NCAAs in 6 years rather than 0), that's still not good enough.</div>