Remaining BIG 12(8) compared to other P5's in strength

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Many out there (and some in here) keep claiming the remaining BIG 12 (8) are no longer POWER teams if they don't play 1 game vs. OU or 1 gm vs. UT

Here is the actual strength of the remaining BIG 12 compared to all the other P5s with their top 20% of teams also knocked off (2020 numbers).

Lower number means you are stronger.

Guess what--the BIG 12 is #1 in strength amongst all power conferences --which completely blows up the LIE that the remaining BIG 12 schools are G5 quality without OU/UT.

Sagarin comparison--BIG (8) compared to each P5 minus top 20%

B12 (8)
ISU
8​
OK State
19​
TCU
24​
WVU
31​
Baylor
62​
KSU
68​
T Tech
80​
Kansas
130​

average

52.75

B10
OSU
Iowa
Nwestern
Indiana
17​
Wisconsin
18​
PSU
29​
Nebraska
49​
Minnesota
50​
Purdue
56​
Maryland
61​
Michigan
70​
Rutgers
71​
MSU
81​
Illinoios
88​

average

53.63636364

SEC
Alabama
UGA
A&M
Florida
14​
Auburn
26​
Mississippi
32​
LSU
38​
Kentucky
47​
Arkansas
51​
MS State
54​
Missouri
69​
Tennessee
72​
South Car
96​
Vanderbilt
122​

average

56.45454545


ACC
Clemson
UNC
Miami
Pitt
42​
Wake
45​
VT
48​
UL
53​
UVA
57​
NC State
58​
BC
66​
GT
101​
FSU
102​
Syracuse
107​
Duke
113​

average

72


PAC
Arizona St
USC
Oregon
43​
UCLA
46​
Utah
52​
Stanford
75​
Colorado
77​
Washington
78​
Oregon St
91​
Cal
94​
Washington S
98​
Arizona
121​

average

77.5
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Meanwhile here's what the AAC-the conference trying to poach the BIG 12 (8) looks like in comparison with its ENTIRE conference strength (sagarin--2020):

AAC
Cincinnati
16​
UCF
37​
Tulsa
40​
Tulane
73​
SMU
82​
Houston
84​
Memphis
90​
ECU
100​
Navy
117​
USF
134​
Temple
146​

average

83.54545455
 
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
Now the big drama will be how much Oklahoma and Texas actually pay to leave. The full combined $160 million. Or just wait for others to leave the Big 12 and thereby wipe out the exit fee?

If the remaining 8 sit tight they can get $160 million ($20 million apiece) for doing nothing.

This is NOT the time to panic and make a mad bolt for the exit door.

WVU's decision must be based on how much money WVU would gain or lose by staying or leaving, and for which conference?

This is a college sports version of an American soap opera.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
AND here are TV viewer comparisons (BIG 12/8 compared to other P5-top 20% and AAC)

From the 2019 TV season:

Here the BIG 12 landed in 3RD place--again illustrating the remaining schools are indeed POWER conference schools compared to the other power conferences:

SEC2019 TV
Alabama
UGA
A&M
32.69​
Florida
44.57​
Auburn
52.91​
Mississippi
12.55​
LSU
Kentucky
8.7​
Arkansas
9.96​
MS State
14.19​
Missouri
7.83​
Tennessee
17.73​
South Car
15.68​
Vanderbilt
3.05​
average
19.98727273


B102019 TV
OSU
Iowa
23.72​
Nwestern
12.97​
Indiana
13.59​
Wisconsin
PSU
47.69​
Nebraska
19.21​
Minnesota
24.62​
Purdue
9.18​
Maryland
8.04​
Michigan
Rutgers
1.74​
MSU
24.51​
Illinoios
5.9​
average
17.37909091


B12 (8)2019 TV
ISU
14.96​
OK State
20.98​
TCU
9.96​
WVU
13.27​
Baylor
34.01​
KSU
13.26​
T Tech
11.04​
Kansas
4.7​
average
15.2725


PAC2019 TV
Arizona St
14.94​
USC
Oregon
UCLA
11.79​
Utah
21.94​
Stanford
11.76​
Colorado
10.07​
Washington
19.43​
Oregon St
1.93​
Cal
7.28​
Washington S
11.78​
Arizona
7.67​
average
11.859


ACC2019 TV
Clemson
UNC
10.41​
Miami
Pitt
11.35​
Wake
7.97​
VT
11.27​
UL
12.28​
UVA
NC State
5.48​
BC
3.18​
GT
2.91​
FSU
10.87​
Syracuse
7.12​
Duke
6.29​
average
8.102727273

AAC2019 TV
Cincinnati
13.54​
UCF
9.02​
Tulsa
2.52​
Tulane
3.72​
SMU
6.3​
Houston
11.01​
Memphis
17.88​
ECU
0.37​
Navy
14.49​
USF
3.99​
Temple
3.74​
average
7.870909091
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Just to promote WVU a little--in 2018 when WVU was 8-4 they had tv viewership of
27.183 million viewers. WVU was 5-5 in 2019 and still outrated many teams in other P5s.

They would have been the #2 ACC school for tv viewers that season (2018) behind only Clemson.

Also a side note on tv viewing. EVERY game but 1, occasionally 2 for BIG 12 squads is rated, while most of the other conferences games on their networks were not rated. This skews the other conferences numbers upwards. i.e. WVU had 10 games rated in the 2019 example while Louisville had just 5 on "regular" tv rated, the other numbers being too low to report. Same for the other P5s with each school having differing numbers of games reported based on how many landed on conference networks or third tier outlets.
 
Last edited:

Clonewithasigh

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2001
96,005
35,299
113
Now the big drama will be how much Oklahoma and Texas actually pay to leave. The full combined $160 million. Or just wait for others to leave the Big 12 and thereby wipe out the exit fee?

If the remaining 8 sit tight they can get $160 million ($20 million apiece) for doing nothing.

This is NOT the time to panic and make a mad bolt for the exit door.

WVU's decision must be based on how much money WVU would gain or lose by staying or leaving, and for which conference?

This is a college sports version of an American soap opera.
Don’t forget ESPN is on the hook for over $1Billion
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Now the big drama will be how much Oklahoma and Texas actually pay to leave. The full combined $160 million. Or just wait for others to leave the Big 12 and thereby wipe out the exit fee?

If the remaining 8 sit tight they can get $160 million ($20 million apiece) for doing nothing.

This is NOT the time to panic and make a mad bolt for the exit door.

WVU's decision must be based on how much money WVU would gain or lose by staying or leaving, and for which conference?

This is a college sports version of an American soap opera.
Yes hard to know the exact amounts because we dont know the exact numbers but its going to be interesting to see how much they pay on their way out.

Bowlsby had a statement that their schools and fans will be treated cordially over the next four years.

But as we know they will try to leave right away if they can most likely— thats apparently going to be problematic.

As for the remainders none can leave right away anyway unless they are invited somewhere and added and everyone agrees to move on. Otherwise minimum of 18 months and someone besides the BIG 12 schools will need to pay all the buyouts.

Most likely this is going to take quite some time to sort out.
 
Last edited:

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
This may be your dumbest thread yet, Bucky. You're taking a set of numbers, eliminating the ones that you don't like, and using the rest to advance a transparent agenda. How silly.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Here's where the existing BIG 12 schools stand in terms of strength of conference compared to the AAC and all the P5s with all of their existing members--once again proving that despite the endless negative rhetoric, the remaining BIG 12 schools make up a very competitive and strong POWER group of schools:

They aren't #1 if everyone is included, but they are far from last or on the level of the AAC.

B10final sagarin rating 2020
OSU
2​
Iowa
7​
Nwestern
15​
Indiana
17​
Wisconsin
18​
PSU
29​
Nebraska
49​
Minnesota
50​
Purdue
56​
Maryland
61​
Michigan
70​
Rutgers
71​
MSU
81​
Illinoios
88​
average
43.85714286


SECfinal sagarin rating 2020
Alabama
1​
UGA
6​
A&M
11​
Florida
14​
Auburn
26​
Mississippi
32​
LSU
38​
Kentucky
47​
Arkansas
51​
MS State
54​
Missouri
69​
Tennessee
72​
South Car
96​
Vanderbilt
122​
average
45.64285714

B12 (8)final sagarin rating 2020
ISU
8​
OK State
19​
TCU
24​
WVU
31​
Baylor
62​
KSU
68​
T Tech
80​
Kansas
130​
average
52.75

ACCfinal sagarin rating 2020
Clemson
4​
UNC
22​
Miami
27​
Pitt
42​
Wake
45​
VT
48​
UL
53​
UVA
57​
NC State
58​
BC
66​
GT
101​
FSU
102​
Syracuse
107​
Duke
113​
average
60.35714286

PACfinal sagarin rating 2020
Arizona St
23​
USC
34​
Oregon
43​
UCLA
46​
Utah
52​
Stanford
75​
Colorado
77​
Washington
78​
Oregon St
91​
Cal
94​
Washington S
98​
Arizona
121​
average
69.33333333


AACfinal sagarin rating 2020
Cincinnati
16​
UCF
37​
Tulsa
40​
Tulane
73​
SMU
82​
Houston
84​
Memphis
90​
ECU
100​
Navy
117​
USF
134​
Temple
146​
average
83.54545455
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
This may be your dumbest thread yet, Bucky. You're taking a set of numbers, eliminating the ones that you don't like, and using the rest to advance a transparent agenda. How silly.
Twenty percent of the BIG 12 has been eliminated. So to do an honest comparison the same is done for the other conferences.

I'm not "eliminating the ones I don't like" as your idiotic lie implies, I'm comparing like institutions from multiple conferences using the same criteria. Take off the top 20% and compare the rest (after all the claim has been if you eliminate OU/UT the remaining 80% schools are supposed to be nothing compared to these other POWER conferences).

But as you can see (as posted above), it doesn't matter if you include ALL the data, similar results are still true. The BIG 12 IS a POWER conference with or without UT/OU.

If its not, neither are 80% of any of the other conferences including the Big Ten and SEC which have a LOWER rating than the remainder of BIG 12 schools. WITH everything included the BIG 12 eight still scores ahead of the ACC and PAC considerably
 

westsiderSJHS77

New member
Aug 9, 2008
2,679
0
0
The risk here is who will look at all the above data and offer a good TV deal? Toss ESPN out the window. (thanks Big Bob) Fox is going to need to keep Big 10 fat and happy. ACC will move up to third in dollars per school and the new Big 8 will be down in the AAC level.

Also, if each school stays to get every dime out of OU and UT, you can bet that each member will have to sign up for X number of years and have a huge buyout clause. I doubt that anyone will be allowed to get their share and bolt.
So if the ACC and or Big 10 want to add a couple of schools, everyone will be tied up legally.
I can also see ESPN offering a little more but you better bet that Tuesday night ESPN 3 home games will be the norm.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
That's a better argument, Bucky (your post #9, that is). However, the Sagarain ratings won't be as good for the remaining Big 12 schools going forward (if things remain status quo, which they won't), as they will lose all of the points that they receive for playing (and a couple of them, even beating) Oklahoma. Moreover, none of the remaining schools has been invited to the CFP or won a national title in 75 years, IIRC. These facts shape national perception.
 

westsiderSJHS77

New member
Aug 9, 2008
2,679
0
0
Twenty percent of the BIG 12 has been eliminated. So to do an honest comparison the same is done for the other conferences.

I'm not "eliminating the ones I don't like" as your idiotic lie implies, I'm comparing like institutions from multiple conferences using the same criteria.

But as you can see, it doesn't matter if you include ALL the data, similar results are still true. The BIG 12 IS a POWER conference with or without UT/OU.

If its not, neither are 80% of any of the other conferences including the Big Ten and SEC which have a LOWER rating than the remainder of BIG 12 schools. WITH everything included the BIG 12 eight still scores ahead of the ACC and PAC considerably
How many of those ratings were helped along because they were playing the two schools leaving?
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
Twenty percent of the BIG 12 has been eliminated. So to do an honest comparison the same is done for the other conferences.

I'm not "eliminating the ones I don't like" as your idiotic lie implies, I'm comparing like institutions from multiple conferences using the same criteria. Take off the top 20% and compare the rest (after all the claim has been if you eliminate OU/UT the remaining 80% schools are supposed to be nothing compared to these other POWER conferences).

But as you can see (as posted above), it doesn't matter if you include ALL the data, similar results are still true. The BIG 12 IS a POWER conference with or without UT/OU.

If its not, neither are 80% of any of the other conferences including the Big Ten and SEC which have a LOWER rating than the remainder of BIG 12 schools. WITH everything included the BIG 12 eight still scores ahead of the ACC and PAC considerably
But it makes no sense to "take off" the top 20% of the other conferences, as they haven't lost any members (yet), remember? Moreover, Texas wasn't the Big 12's second best team, so why do you remove the top 20% of the other conferences? You're comparing apples to oranges, and not making any sense.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Do the same with tv viewers put all the teams existing currently in the major conferences and AAC--the The B10 moves under the SEC, the BIG 12 slides slightly under the 12 team PAC, but is STILL well within the POWER ranks for tv viewership with the existing 8 schools:

TV viewers comparison--BIG (8) compared to each P5

SEC2019 TV viewers
Alabama
72.95​
UGA
70.17​
A&M
32.69​
Florida
44.57​
Auburn
52.91​
Mississippi
12.55​
LSU
108.01​
Kentucky
8.7​
Arkansas
9.96​
MS State
14.19​
Missouri
7.83​
Tennessee
17.73​
South Car
15.68​
Vanderbilt
3.05​
average
33.64214286


B102019 TV viewers
OSU
88.85​
Iowa
23.72​
Nwestern
12.97​
Indiana
13.59​
Wisconsin
58​
PSU
47.69​
Nebraska
19.21​
Minnesota
24.62​
Purdue
9.18​
Maryland
8.04​
Michigan
66.87​
Rutgers
1.74​
MSU
24.51​
Illinoios
5.9​
average
28.92071429


PAC2019 TV viewers
Arizona St
14.94​
USC
23.61​
Oregon
47.73​
UCLA
11.79​
Utah
21.94​
Stanford
11.76​
Colorado
10.07​
Washington
19.43​
Oregon St
1.93​
Cal
7.28​
Washington S
11.78​
Arizona
7.67​
average
15.8275


2019 TV viewers2019 TV viewers
ISU
14.96​
OK State
20.98​
TCU
9.96​
WVU
13.27​
Baylor
34.01​
KSU
13.26​
T Tech
11.04​
Kansas
4.7​
average
15.2725

2019 TV viewers2019 TV viewers
Clemson
76.73​
UNC
10.41​
Miami
14.83​
Pitt
11.35​
Wake
7.97​
VT
11.27​
UL
12.28​
UVA
17.84​
NC State
5.48​
BC
3.18​
GT
2.91​
FSU
10.87​
Syracuse
7.12​
Duke
6.29​
average
14.18071429

AAC2019 TV viewers
Cincinnati
13.54​
UCF
9.02​
Tulsa
2.52​
Tulane
3.72​
SMU
6.3​
Houston
11.01​
Memphis
17.88​
ECU
0.37​
Navy
14.49​
USF
3.99​
Temple
3.74​
average
7.870909091
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
How many of those ratings were helped along because they were playing the two schools leaving?
No more than in the OTHER conferences because they were playing the top teams in their conference.

Even without those top schools (and Texas wasn't #2 in the BIG 12 every year), BIG 12 schools can schedule power teams OOC as well--especially in an 8 team alignment.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
How many of those TV viewers of Big 12 games were watching because Texas or Oklahoma was a participant?
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
But it makes no sense to "take off" the top 20% of the other conferences, as they haven't lost any members (yet), remember? Moreover, Texas wasn't the Big 12's second best team, so why do you remove the top 20% of the other conferences? You're comparing apples to oranges, and not making any sense.
Yes, it does. If you are saying the 8 remaining schools in the BIG 12 are no longer power schools--that is the same as saying they cannot get ratings on tv (or have the strength of) any of the schools in the other power conferences.

If you look at 80% of those other conferences or even 100%--the BIG 12 schools STILL fit in the power conferences in terms of strength and in terms of ability to generate power conference level tv ratings.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
How many of those TV viewers of Big 12 games were watching because Texas or Oklahoma was a participant?
No more than the 80% of schools in those other larger conferences. What do they look like if you take off the top 20% viewers in their conference?

All the anti BIG 12 rhetoric always tries to give everyone else a pass somehow.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
Nobody, but those looking through Old Gold & Blue foggy glasses believes that the remaining Big 12 is worthy of a Power 5 designation, without adding more members. You haven't addressed the Elephant in the Room, Bucky. Talk to me about CFP invitations and national titles in the last 75 years. Even the PAC 12 has you beaten there.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
1 game each against UT or OU does NOT make up a significant portion of any BIG 12 schools schedule.

That's like only 16 percent of their schedule in a given year.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
You're desperate, and totally wrong, Bucky. Chew on this (2020 games)...

HIGHEST-RATED BIG 12 FOOTBALL GAMES​

Oklahoma vs. Texas: 4.81 million
Oklahoma vs. Oklahoma State: 4.10 million
Texas vs Oklahoma State: 4.04 million
Oklahoma vs Iowa State: 3.71 million
Texas vs Iowa State: 3.57 million
Big 12 Championship Game (Oklahoma vs. Iowa State): 2.99 million
Iowa State vs Oklahoma State: 2.81 million
Texas vs Texas Tech: 2.72 million

 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Nobody, but those looking through Old Gold & Blue foggy glasses believes that the remaining Big 12 is worthy of a Power 5 designation, without adding more members. You haven't addressed the Elephant in the Room, Bucky. Talk to me about CFP invitations and national titles in the last 75 years. Even the PAC 12 has you beaten there.
I haven't said either that the BIG 12 would or will or won't add more members or that they will or won't stay together.

The point is--looking factually at the situation instead of subjectively--the BIG 12 schools that remain are not g5 level schools by any stretch of the imagination unless 80% of the rest of college football in the power conferences is. They are POWER schools in every metric and remain that way.

TCU/Baylor and OK State would likely have titles just since 2011 had they not artificially been blocked from PLAYING in one. WVU has also played for a national title and came close not all that long ago.

In a 12 team playoff, they'd undoubtedly be able to place teams in such a playoff and if you get in there's a chance to win it.

But winning national championships in a rigged system doesn't determine whether you are a power school or not. Most if not all of the 80% in the other power conferences haven't won a national championship in the last 75 years EITHER. Again--talk about being SELECTIVE--your anti BIG 12 agenda is showing again.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
You're desperate, and totally wrong, Bucky. Chew on this (2020 games)...

HIGHEST-RATED BIG 12 FOOTBALL GAMES​

Oklahoma vs. Texas: 4.81 million
Oklahoma vs. Oklahoma State: 4.10 million
Texas vs Oklahoma State: 4.04 million
Oklahoma vs Iowa State: 3.71 million
Texas vs Iowa State: 3.57 million
Big 12 Championship Game (Oklahoma vs. Iowa State): 2.99 million
Iowa State vs Oklahoma State: 2.81 million
Texas vs Texas Tech: 2.72 million

Now show the highest rated Big 10, ACC, SEC and PAC games and you'll get similar results.

Alabama rates highest in the SEC--and they help the teams that play them.

Ohio State rates highest in the B10

Clemson in the ACC (also ND last year in their 1 year stint)

and so forth and so on.

Why are you only providing data for the BIG 12 rather than EVERYONE like I have?
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,331
250
63
Do the same with tv viewers put all the teams existing currently in the major conferences and AAC--the The B10 moves under the SEC, the BIG 12 slides slightly under the 12 team PAC, but is STILL well within the POWER ranks for tv viewership with the existing 8 schools:

TV viewers comparison--BIG (8) compared to each P5

SEC2019 TV viewers
Alabama
72.95​
UGA
70.17​
A&M
32.69​
Florida
44.57​
Auburn
52.91​
Mississippi
12.55​
LSU
108.01​
Kentucky
8.7​
Arkansas
9.96​
MS State
14.19​
Missouri
7.83​
Tennessee
17.73​
South Car
15.68​
Vanderbilt
3.05​
average
33.64214286


B102019 TV viewers
OSU
88.85​
Iowa
23.72​
Nwestern
12.97​
Indiana
13.59​
Wisconsin
58​
PSU
47.69​
Nebraska
19.21​
Minnesota
24.62​
Purdue
9.18​
Maryland
8.04​
Michigan
66.87​
Rutgers
1.74​
MSU
24.51​
Illinoios
5.9​
average
28.92071429


PAC2019 TV viewers
Arizona St
14.94​
USC
23.61​
Oregon
47.73​
UCLA
11.79​
Utah
21.94​
Stanford
11.76​
Colorado
10.07​
Washington
19.43​
Oregon St
1.93​
Cal
7.28​
Washington S
11.78​
Arizona
7.67​
average
15.8275


2019 TV viewers2019 TV viewers
ISU
14.96​
OK State
20.98​
TCU
9.96​
WVU
13.27​
Baylor
34.01​
KSU
13.26​
T Tech
11.04​
Kansas
4.7​
average
15.2725

2019 TV viewers2019 TV viewers
Clemson
76.73​
UNC
10.41​
Miami
14.83​
Pitt
11.35​
Wake
7.97​
VT
11.27​
UL
12.28​
UVA
17.84​
NC State
5.48​
BC
3.18​
GT
2.91​
FSU
10.87​
Syracuse
7.12​
Duke
6.29​
average
14.18071429

AAC2019 TV viewers
Cincinnati
13.54​
UCF
9.02​
Tulsa
2.52​
Tulane
3.72​
SMU
6.3​
Houston
11.01​
Memphis
17.88​
ECU
0.37​
Navy
14.49​
USF
3.99​
Temple
3.74​
average
7.870909091
Where is Texas and OU at in this average?
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
Bucky's first argument was flawed by data mining and arbitrary elimination of real numbers. His second argument is full of "ifs" and "buts."
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
Now show the highest rated Big 10, ACC, SEC and PAC games and you'll get similar results.

Alabama rates highest in the SEC--and they help the teams that play them.

Ohio State rates highest in the B10

Clemson in the ACC (also ND last year in their 1 year stint)

and so forth and so on.

Why are you only providing data for the BIG 12 rather than EVERYONE like I have?
Yes, and all of those schools remain in their same conferences, which is the point. Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio State make their conferences Power 5 caliber. Oklahoma arguably did the same thing for the Big 12, but Oklahoma is gone, so WVU needs to find a new and better home.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Bucky's first argument was flawed by data mining and arbitrary elimination of real numbers. His second argument is full of "ifs" and "buts."
King Coal is lying because for some reason he doesn't want the truth revealed.

I used the same criteria to compare schools in the BIG 12 without its top 20% and the other power conferences without their top 20% and the AAC.

Then I brought in all of the existing schools because I knew morons like coal would try to claim that isn't legit somehow.

It ALL shows the same thing--BIG 12 schools that remain are far and above a G5 level no matter how you look at it. If they aren't? Then neither is most of the rest of college football because they have less viewers or rate lower as power schools or both.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Yes, and all of those schools remain in their same conferences, which is the point. Alabama, Clemson, and Ohio State make their conferences Power 5 caliber. Oklahoma arguably did the same thing for the Big 12, but Oklahoma is gone, so WVU needs to find a new and better home.
No, ALL of the schools in the conference make a conference a power conference. If not, then you are claiming Ohio State, Alabama are playing a G5 or lower schedule in order to get wins, and then because they win lots of games vs. lower competition--you call them "power" schools.

Not the way it works at all.

Schools in the BIG 12 that remain have better strength as teams and better viewing than much of the schools in the other power conferences, therefore they are NOT at some lower level.

1 game vs. OU or 1 game vs UT doesn't change that at all.

The evidence is clear.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
King Coal is lying because for some reason he doesn't want the truth revealed.

I used the same criteria to compare schools in the BIG 12 without its top 20% and the other power conferences without their top 20% and the AAC.

Then I brought in all of the existing schools because I knew morons like coal would try to claim that isn't legit somehow.

It ALL shows the same thing--BIG 12 schools that remain are far and above a G5 level no matter how you look at it. If they aren't? Then neither is most of the rest of college football because they have less viewers or rate lower as power schools or both.
You're now resorting to personal attacks and lies because you realize that you've created a fairy tale that nobody, but you (maybe, not even you) believes. The Big 12 won't survive as a Power 5 conference with its current eight teams past 2025. That's why WVU needs to leave.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
You're now resorting to personal attacks and lies because you realize that you've created a fairy tale that nobody, but you (maybe, not even you) believes. The Big 12 won't survive as a Power 5 conference with its current eight teams past 2025. That's why WVU needs to leave.
LOL--I'm resorting to personal attacks?! Read your post above troll.

The BIG 12 may choose to go on with its current membership and the facts play out that they are worth significant revenues and have significant strength as a conference--even with only eight schools.

You just don't want that to be true because you have an agenda.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
No, ALL of the schools in the conference make a conference a power conference. If not, then you are claiming Ohio State, Alabama are playing a G5 or lower schedule in order to get wins, and then because they win lots of games vs. lower competition--you call them "power" schools.

Not the way it works at all.

Schools in the BIG 12 that remain have better strength as teams and better viewing than much of the schools in the other power conferences, therefore they are NOT at some lower level.

1 game vs. OU or 1 game vs UT doesn't change that at all.

The evidence is clear.
It's funny that nobody has supported your fairy tale, but "the evidence is clear." You wouldn't know evidence, if a notarized eviction notice landed on your lap.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
LOL--I'm resorting to personal attacks?! Read your post above troll.

The BIG 12 may choose to go on with its current membership and the facts play out that they are worth significant revenues and have significant strength as a conference--even with only eight schools.

You just don't want that to be true because you have an agenda.
You're projecting again, Bucky. Your agenda is clear, and your "evidence" is fatally flawed. WVU needs to exit stage left, if it wants to be in a Power 5 conference.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
The information is there--all factual. Anyone can look it up.

Anyone with intelligence sees that there is a false narrative being spun about BIG 12 squads in an effort to devalue them so someone else can steal that value.

If BIG 12 schools aren't power schools then there are so few power schools you couldn't even field one conference.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
FOX is consolidating all their money behind the B1G….
FOX could step up and save the Big 12 but they don’t want to
The money they will save will be put into the B1G

This is the issue with all these schools.
Why the PAC 12 needs to bring another media company into the picture

Has nothing to do with devaluing them…
It is the fact that there isn’t a power conference who wants them.
Unless the PAC attempts to do something different. PAC doesn’t bow down to anyone.

As much **** as that conference takes about being a bunch of West Coast liberals and not caring about sports I have respect for that
They haven’t sold their ***
But maybe not caring about sports does help here
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
If you look at i.e. the Big Ten tv ratings.

Estimates are that the Big Ten is going to be getting maybe $70-$80 million per school in their next contracts.

They had roughly an average of 29 million viewers per school in 2020 while the BIG 12 had roughly 15 million.

15 is what % of 29? Roughly 52%

So let's say the Big Ten receives $75 million then 52% of that would be about $39 million per school BIG 12 schools might expect as a base estimate--NOT $10-$15 million as many out there are speculating as their worth. Add some schools and that rate should move even higher.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
The information is there--all factual. Anyone can look it up.

Anyone with intelligence sees that there is a false narrative being spun about BIG 12 squads in an effort to devalue them so someone else can steal that value.

If BIG 12 schools aren't power schools then there are so few power schools you couldn't even field one conference.
Your clear agenda blinds you from the facts, and you will never see the Big 12 survive as a Power 5 conference with only the eight remaining teams. Instead of being a stubborn fool, you should want what's best for WVU, which is leaving the Big 12, and joining a true Power 5 conference.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
Not just TV ratings you also have conference sponsors

How many big time companies does Iowa, Kansas and WV have
4-5 million between those places
Houston metro area is bigger. Same as the DFW metro area. Not the market and there isn’t the economy

Companies in Texas and Oklahoma will put money up but not the amount that they did before because you are losing the main schools
That money is shifting East to the SEC. SEC wants to consolidate its power in Texas