Remaining BIG 12(8) compared to other P5's in strength

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
If you look at i.e. the Big Ten tv ratings.

Estimates are that the Big Ten is going to be getting maybe $70-$80 million per school in their next contracts.

They had roughly an average of 29 million viewers per school in 2020 while the BIG 12 had roughly 15 million.

15 is what % of 29? Roughly 52%

So let's say the Big Ten receives $75 million then 52% of that would be about $39 million per school BIG 12 schools might expect as a base estimate--NOT $10-$15 million as many out there are speculating as their worth. Add some schools and that rate should move even higher.
You keep ignoring the fact that Texas and Oklahoma had the most TV viewers, and will be gone soon, so the 2020 TV numbers for the Big 12 are irrelevant once the Longhorns and Sooners are gone. Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
You keep ignoring the fact that Texas and Oklahoma had the most TV viewers, and will be gone soon, so the 2020 TV numbers for the Big 12 are irrelevant once the Longhorns and Sooners are gone. Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.
I am talking about ONLY the EXISTING BIG 12 members --8 schools no OU/UT involved.

The numbers are just as relevant as the lower 80% of every other conference if you took out their games against the top 20%.

If they are still power teams and they are, then so are BIG 12 squads.

Its not as though BIG 12 teams sans OU or UT won't be able to play any number of schools in other conferences that bring in those sort of viewers.

They aren't going to just be playing themselves and the traitors aren't the only schools that generate strong tv ratings. Many generate better ratings than those two did.

Also again, OU and UT only contributed to 16% of the games these schools played. Now the remaining membership will get the spotlight games for the BIG 12 conference--if they decide to continue on that is.
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
I am talking about ONLY the EXISTING BIG 12 members --8 schools no OU/UT involved.

The numbers are just as relevant as the lower 80% of every other conference if you took out their games against the top 20%.

If they are still power teams and they are, then so are BIG 12 squads.

Its not as though BIG 12 teams sans OU or UT won't be able to play any number of schools in other conferences that bring in those sort of viewers.

They aren't going to just be playing themselves and the traitors aren't the only schools that generate strong tv ratings. Many generate better ratings than those two did.

Also again, OU and UT only contributed to 16% of the games these schools played. Now the remaining membership will get the spotlight games for the BIG 12 conference--if they decide to continue on that is.
"According to an article released by blackandgoldbanneret.com (UCF SB Nation page), the Big 12 has averaged about 955,000 viewers in games not involving Oklahoma and Texas over the past three seasons. That number was reached by averaging the individual year average as opposed to going back and reviewing every game meaning the number may be off a few thousand."

"Yes, you read that correctly the Big 12 average is 955K while BYU’s is 1.11M."

 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
Weird obsession some of these schools had.
WVU was falling victim to it.


TCU for one wasn’t like that when they came into the conference
Could stand on their own two feet
But are saying without Texas and OU no one is interested.

You also have an issue with the media companies
Do you understand that they can control how the game is watched. Meaning the sound of the crowd. They like to play with mics
 

Clonewithasigh

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2001
96,005
35,299
113
If you look at i.e. the Big Ten tv ratings.

Estimates are that the Big Ten is going to be getting maybe $70-$80 million per school in their next contracts.

They had roughly an average of 29 million viewers per school in 2020 while the BIG 12 had roughly 15 million.

15 is what % of 29? Roughly 52%

So let's say the Big Ten receives $75 million then 52% of that would be about $39 million per school BIG 12 schools might expect as a base estimate--NOT $10-$15 million as many out there are speculating as their worth. Add some schools and that rate should move even higher.
There is a possibility of tiered shares that could be paid. That model has been rejected by the B10 as they have equal shares going to all members. Here is an example that clouds your numbers above. The Iowa Hawkeyes averaged 1.39M viewers per game last year while my Cyclones averaged 2.3M viewers per game. Clones had 65% more viewers on average. Even if you want to pull out the 6.5M viewers that watched the CCG & Fiesta bowl, the Clones averaged 1.74M viewers which is still 25% more per game. I will be interested in what the numbers look like this year. Good football will bring viewers.
 

Clonewithasigh

Well-known member
Jun 18, 2001
96,005
35,299
113
You keep ignoring the fact that Texas and Oklahoma had the most TV viewers, and will be gone soon, so the 2020 TV numbers for the Big 12 are irrelevant once the Longhorns and Sooners are gone. Again, you're comparing apples to oranges.
Good football will bring viewers. OU averaged 3.2M viewers, and UT averaged 3.1M. 3rd in conf was ISU at 2.3M, and 4th was OSU at 2.2M.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
Many out there (and some in here) keep claiming the remaining BIG 12 (8) are no longer POWER teams if they don't play 1 game vs. OU or 1 gm vs. UT

Here is the actual strength of the remaining BIG 12 compared to all the other P5s with their top 20% of teams also knocked off (2020 numbers).

Lower number means you are stronger.

Guess what--the BIG 12 is #1 in strength amongst all power conferences --which completely blows up the LIE that the remaining BIG 12 schools are G5 quality without OU/UT.

Sagarin comparison--BIG (8) compared to each P5 minus top 20%

B12 (8)
ISU
8​
OK State
19​
TCU
24​
WVU
31​
Baylor
62​
KSU
68​
T Tech
80​
Kansas
130​

average

52.75

B10
OSU
Iowa
Nwestern
Indiana
17​
Wisconsin
18​
PSU
29​
Nebraska
49​
Minnesota
50​
Purdue
56​
Maryland
61​
Michigan
70​
Rutgers
71​
MSU
81​
Illinoios
88​

average

53.63636364

SEC
Alabama
UGA
A&M
Florida
14​
Auburn
26​
Mississippi
32​
LSU
38​
Kentucky
47​
Arkansas
51​
MS State
54​
Missouri
69​
Tennessee
72​
South Car
96​
Vanderbilt
122​

average

56.45454545


ACC
Clemson
UNC
Miami
Pitt
42​
Wake
45​
VT
48​
UL
53​
UVA
57​
NC State
58​
BC
66​
GT
101​
FSU
102​
Syracuse
107​
Duke
113​

average

72


PAC
Arizona St
USC
Oregon
43​
UCLA
46​
Utah
52​
Stanford
75​
Colorado
77​
Washington
78​
Oregon St
91​
Cal
94​
Washington S
98​
Arizona
121​

average

77.5


Jibberish that means nothing. The Big12 is done as a respected Power Conference.

ACCept it!
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
Jibberish that means nothing. The Big12 is done as a respected Power Conference.

ACCept it!
ACC isn’t that far behind😂
You cannot admit reality.
Do you really think those schools who have the chance to be in the SEC will stay in the ACC even with making 50 million Dollars less on TV deals
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Here are the last 3 years of ACTUAL BIG 12 viewing #s:

BIG 122020 season viewers
20.75- Oklahoma State (10)
20.43- Iowa State (11)
14.19- Kansas State (10)
11.81- West Virginia (9)
10.87- TCU (10)
10.74- Texas Tech (8)
8.02- Baylor (9)
4.49- Kansas (8)

BIG 122019 season viewers
34.01- Baylor (11)
20.98- Oklahoma State (11)
14.96- Iowa State (12)
13.27- West Virginia (10)
13.26- Kansas State (9)
11.04- Texas Tech (10)
9.96- TCU (9)
4.70- Kansas (6)

BIG 122018 season viewers
27.183- West Virginia (11)
21.532- TCU (12)
21.026- Oklahoma State (11)
15.394- Iowa State (9)
13.760- Texas Tech (10)
11.080- Baylor (11)
8.041- Kansas State (8)
5.889- Kansas (6)
*numbers above in millions of viewers

There is ALOT of misinformation being spread about BIG 12 TV VIEWERS amongst the remaining membership
 
Last edited:

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Something always left out of other power conference #s as well:

All of their games ARE NOT RATED. Why? BECAUSE THEIR CONFERENCE NETWORK/TIER 3 GAMES RATE SO LOW THEY AREN'T INCLUDED in NEILSEN.

BTN games have started to be rated-, SECN, ACCN, PACN games are NOT.

IF these games were included it would DROP the ratings of all other power conference teams.

Meanwhile as you see above, nearly all BIG 12 games had been telecast and were therefore rated --top ones and bottom ones.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
BYU 2020 season viewers 7.95 million (10 games)
BYU 2019 season viewers 11.28 million (8 games)

So they'd actually appear to be in the bottom to lower few teams level of the existing BIG 12 membership.
 
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
Twenty percent of the BIG 12 has been eliminated. So to do an honest comparison the same is done for the other conferences.

I'm not "eliminating the ones I don't like" as your idiotic lie implies, I'm comparing like institutions from multiple conferences using the same criteria. Take off the top 20% and compare the rest (after all the claim has been if you eliminate OU/UT the remaining 80% schools are supposed to be nothing compared to these other POWER conferences).

But as you can see (as posted above), it doesn't matter if you include ALL the data, similar results are still true. The BIG 12 IS a POWER conference with or without UT/OU.

If its not, neither are 80% of any of the other conferences including the Big Ten and SEC which have a LOWER rating than the remainder of BIG 12 schools. WITH everything included the BIG 12 eight still scores ahead of the ACC and PAC considerably

BIG 12'S STRENGTH WAS DEPTH. IT'S MIDDLING TEAMS WERE BETTER THAN OTHER CONFERENCES' MIDDLING TEAMS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS IN THE CURRENT GAME OF CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT. NOTHING IS SET IN CONCRETE ANY MORE. WVU HAS GONE FROM SOUTHERN, TO INDEPENDENT, TO BIG EAST TO BIG 12. IT'S MAKING ME DIZZY TRYING TO KEEP UP. AND THEN IT CHANGES AGAIN.
 

Rootmaster

New member
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
BIG 12'S STRENGTH WAS DEPTH. IT'S MIDDLING TEAMS WERE BETTER THAN OTHER CONFERENCES' MIDDLING TEAMS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS IN THE CURRENT GAME OF CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT. NOTHING IS SET IN CONCRETE ANY MORE. WVU HAS GONE FROM SOUTHERN, TO INDEPENDENT, TO BIG EAST TO BIG 12. IT'S MAKING ME DIZZY TRYING TO KEEP UP. AND THEN IT CHANGES AGAIN.
Trust us...that's not what makes you dizzy.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
BIG 12'S STRENGTH WAS DEPTH. IT'S MIDDLING TEAMS WERE BETTER THAN OTHER CONFERENCES' MIDDLING TEAMS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS IN THE CURRENT GAME OF CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT. NOTHING IS SET IN CONCRETE ANY MORE. WVU HAS GONE FROM SOUTHERN, TO INDEPENDENT, TO BIG EAST TO BIG 12. IT'S MAKING ME DIZZY TRYING TO KEEP UP. AND THEN IT CHANGES AGAIN.
Yes, makes you wish everyone was just independent. This false grouping of schools because someone decides this or that one is more valuable just because and then they make sure to only promote that school or schools is destroying the fanbases that pay all the bills in the first place.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
BIG 12'S STRENGTH WAS DEPTH. IT'S MIDDLING TEAMS WERE BETTER THAN OTHER CONFERENCES' MIDDLING TEAMS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS IN THE CURRENT GAME OF CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT. NOTHING IS SET IN CONCRETE ANY MORE. WVU HAS GONE FROM SOUTHERN, TO INDEPENDENT, TO BIG EAST TO BIG 12. IT'S MAKING ME DIZZY TRYING TO KEEP UP. AND THEN IT CHANGES AGAIN.

No one else, besides you, thought Big12 football had any strengths. Homers are adorable.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
No one else, besides you, thought Big12 football had any strengths. Homers are adorable.
This is not true in any way shape or form.

What is wrong with you trolls? Meds wearing off? Give it a flipping rest.

you go to other schools boards and people can actually discuss things. Here disturbed, sick individuals try to derail every thread and chase away every poster and spread disinformation that hurts WVU.

fing disgrace.
 
Last edited:
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
Yes, makes you wish everyone was just independent. This false grouping of schools because someone decides this or that one is more valuable just because and then they make sure to only promote that school or schools is destroying the fanbases that pay all the bills in the first place.

FAN BASES DO NOT PAY ALL THE BILLS. TV DOES. WHICH IS WHY TV CALLS THE SHOTS. FOLLOW THE MONEY. WVU WENT FROM $10 MILLION TO $40 MILLION BECAUSE TV PAID MORE TO THE BIG 12 THAN THE BIG EAST. NOT BECAUSE OF FANBASE MONEY. SEASON TICKETS, PARKING PASSES AND MAC DONATIONS BY YOU AND ME WOULD NOT KEEP ANY SCHOOL AFLOAT. NOT EVEN CLOSE. TV BIG BUCKS ARE A MUST TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
This is not true in any way shape or form.

What is wrong with you trolls? Meds wearing off? Give it a flipping rest.

you go to other schools boards and people can actually discuss things. Here disturbed, sick individuals try to derail every thread and chase away every poster and soread disinformation that hurts WVU.

fing disgrace.


Once you get past your triggered emotional breakdown we can chat. No one cares about flyover hicktown, USA. That’s not my opinion @buckarear. If you’re that much of a homer you can’t be helped. There’s a reason the Big12 is imploding for like the 4th time. Maybe I’m a bit direct but the Big12 sucks so bad Texas and Oklahoma said bye bye. Homers never ACCept reality.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
FAN BASES DO NOT PAY ALL THE BILLS. TV DOES. WHICH IS WHY TV CALLS THE SHOTS. FOLLOW THE MONEY. WVU WENT FROM $10 MILLION TO $40 MILLION BECAUSE TV PAID MORE TO THE BIG 12 THAN THE BIG EAST. NOT BECAUSE OF FANBASE MONEY. SEASON TICKETS, PARKING PASSES AND MAC DONATIONS BY YOU AND ME WOULD NOT KEEP ANY SCHOOL AFLOAT. NOT EVEN CLOSE. TV BIG BUCKS ARE A MUST TO SURVIVE AND THRIVE.
And where does tv get the money to pay the bills? The fanbase that advertisers can market to. Its all connected.

Of course schools need to maintain their P5 level payouts to be competitive--at least to build facilities and pay staff. But i.e. Clemson is the lowest paid major current top program and they are not only in the playoffs every year but also in and have won championships. So money isn't everything--look at Texas, highest paid anywhere and very lackluster on the field.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
And where does tv get the money to pay the bills? The fanbase that advertisers can market to. Its all connected.

Of course schools need to maintain their P5 level payouts to be competitive--at least to build facilities and pay staff. But i.e. Clemson is the lowest paid major current top program and they are not only in the playoffs every year but also in and have won championships. So money isn't everything--look at Texas, highest paid anywhere and very lackluster on the field.

None of your dot connecting means anything. If it did your beloved Big12 wouldn’t have lost the only two programs that matter.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
None of your dot connecting means anything. If it did your beloved Big12 wouldn’t have lost the only two programs that matter.
Facts still matter, despite your lies.

Unfortunately some like yourself have no morals or integrity.

And far more than two programs matter--they are just being played to attempt to send their value somewhere else because someone can't afford the bill for what they are trying to buy.
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
Facts still matter, despite your lies.

Unfortunately some like yourself have no morals or integrity.

And far more than two programs matter--they are just being played to attempt to send their value somewhere else because someone can't afford the bill for what they are trying to buy.


Wow! You’re a train wreck! You only appear when expansion takes place. Then you post every talkin heads take and act like you know something more than the next fanboy with your on opinions 😂. Dude if you think Texas and Oklahoma weren’t the true Big12 value nationally you really are a f’n moron. Let’s bump this with the end result of Texas and Oklahoma leaving. If the Big12 was respected the only two big boys would not have left.

Hey quick trivia question for you.

What is the only Power5 Conference without a CFP win?

You’re a moron fanboy.
 

Buckaineer

New member
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
59
0
Wow! You’re a train wreck! You only appear when expansion takes place. Then you post every talkin heads take and act like you know something more than the next fanboy with your on opinions 😂. Dude if you think Texas and Oklahoma weren’t the true Big12 value nationally you really are a f’n moron. Let’s bump this with the end result of Texas and Oklahoma leaving. If the Big12 was respected the only two big boys would not have left.

Hey quick trivia question for you.

What is the only Power5 Conference without a CFP win?

You’re a moron fanboy.
You are an idiot.

But everyone knew that.

College football is in flux, OU and UT are not the beginning or end of anything except their own overinflated opinion of themselves- much like yourself.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
Why does Bucky always have to be a dummy

The Big 12 was a front the entire time…
It was to get Oklahoma. Missouri somehow fell in their lap as well.
Out of it came a destroyed Nebraska who ended up in the B1G
SEC ended up with 4 schools.
Wasn’t something that was suppose to last.
Disagree with somethings though. Out of the Big 12 came inventive offenses and now we are seeing that on the defensive end. Product of the state of Texas

Now that is in the SEC. Been in there for awhile.
Those games look like Big 12 football
 

MichiganHerd

New member
Aug 17, 2011
27,066
7
0
All worthless chitter chatter.

B1G controls college football. Watch them and what they do. It will tell you all you all you need to know. Fox is going to be the dominant player here.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
We will see

They have already started pushing a certain narrative in Texas
Even with Baylor being left behind they just beat out Michigan on a very good LB recruit.
What you see in Louisiana could happen in Texas
Pretty much the SEC/local teams fencing in their last state
The move by the SEC was to keep schools out of Texas

The question becomes California.
I don’t know if they are trolls or what but a lot of SC fans are pretty much saying they would rather watch SEC football and have given up on their own

Will be hard for the B1G if they are losing out in the states that have the talent
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
You are an idiot.

But everyone knew that.

College football is in flux, OU and UT are not the beginning or end of anything except their own overinflated opinion of themselves- much like yourself.

Still in denial for all to see. You’ll see shortly your definition of “over inflation” makes you a typical fanboy. Big12 is adding joke programs and signing lower money deal or done. In either case you prove to be the doofus once again expansion boy.
 

MichiganHerd

New member
Aug 17, 2011
27,066
7
0
We will see

They have already started pushing a certain narrative in Texas
Even with Baylor being left behind they just beat out Michigan on a very good LB recruit.
What you see in Louisiana could happen in Texas
Pretty much the SEC/local teams fencing in their last state
The move by the SEC was to keep schools out of Texas

The question becomes California.
I don’t know if they are trolls or what but a lot of SC fans are pretty much saying they would rather watch SEC football and have given up on their own

Will be hard for the B1G if they are losing out in the states that have the talent
With all the chatter from clueless posters, looks like Michigan is going to have a big time Texas recruit commit to Michigan in the coming days. Makes like 2 or 3 now.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
0
0
With all the chatter from clueless posters, looks like Michigan is going to have a big time Texas recruit commit to Michigan in the coming days. Makes like 2 or 3 now.

Who?
The big WR going to Georgia now.
The LB committed to Baylor today. Texas was interested in him but passed him over.

If you are talking about the big WR he is heading to UGA