Toggle sidebar

Repeal the Second Amendment

3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
Then we have a very accurate semi auto .243. Do we ban this too? Again, if we hand over definition of an "assault rifle" to government, the power of government's definition of "assault rifle" is endless. This .243 could have been just as deadly in mass shootings as any AR. The far left has your attention by looks. It has a much bigger agenda than an AR-15.

 
Last edited:
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
30CAT said:
Then we have a very accurate semi auto .243. Do we ban this too? Again, if we hand over definition of an "assault rifle" to government, the power of government's definition of "assault rifle" is endless. This .243 could have been just as deadly in mass shootings as any AR. The far left has your attention by looks. It has a much bigger agenda than an AR-15.

Click to expand...


For f’uck’s sake sweetheart. I told you the Congress already defined Assault Weapons. Do yourself a favor and use your google thing.
 
3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
countryroads89 said:
For f’uck’s sake sweetheart. I told you the Congress already defined Assault Weapons. Do yourself a favor and use your google thing.
Click to expand...

Lol...I saw their definition. That .243, pictured above, would not fall into that category, yet it would be just as damaging, which is my point.

It would have banned the pellet gun, .25 air rifle, .22 (also pictured above) and several other weapons, based on looks....LOOKS. It's ridiculous.

Knee-jerk emotional and irrational decision. Just an attempt to claw away at the 2nd Amendment. No time soon, but eventually, the far left will get their way because We The People continue to let the minority dictate to the majority.

Hopefully America will wake up...it's not looking good though.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,208
3,286
113
countryroads89 said:
For f’uck’s sake sweetheart. I told you the Congress already defined Assault Weapons. Do yourself a favor and use your google thing.
Click to expand...
Yet you ignore the point that 90% of their definition was aesthetics and has no impact on functionality or lethality. It was all based in something scary looking. Not surprised liberals support a return to it. Hahahahha
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
countryroads89 said:
after Sandy Hook and 20 children between the ages of SIX and SEVEN years old were massacred and nothing was done, nothing will ever be done. We are a heartless nation. We don't blink an eye when 20 children between the ages of six and seven years old are slaughtered in an elementary school.
Click to expand...

And we argue away as a woman's "choice" or "protecting a woman's health" the wanton slaughter everyday of thousands and even millions annually of perfectly innocent and healthy little Babies who's body parts are chopped up and sold off at auction like so many pieces of meat simply because their Mother's decide they don't want them or want the responsibility of keeping them alive.

Yes I do agree with you country on this. Heartless is too "PC" of a word to describe this ongoing Evil.
 
Last edited:
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
countryroads89 said:
Yeah, his logic, only 27 in a population of 300+ million.
Click to expand...

Yeah...the logic of the Left...kids 6 or 7 years old, as opposed to those just 20 minutes from birth. Kill one it's perfectly OK. Kill the others, remove our Constitutional rights protecting our Freedom.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
30CAT said:
What about this .22?

Click to expand...

Did 'ya notice how none of the Lefties in this thread ever answered any of your direct questions? They went straight from arguing fact and logic into emotion, but no one ever directly answered you did they?

Telling.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
MountaineerWV said:
Yeah, as a result of that incident Republicans and Democrats didn't work to make changes to drunk driving laws did they? And the nation didn't applaud, did they?
Click to expand...

Yup, those vehicles were drunk all right. Stop vehicles from driving drunk...we don't need inebriated cars on our roads...just the ones running on ethanol.[winking]
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
WVU82 said:
lol...

Click to expand...


I'd bet most of the Leftists on here who even bothered to watch that were more upset that little firecracker honey wasn't hugging those trees instead of shooting around them! You go Girl...Love it!!!!!
 
3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
atlkvb said:
I'd bet most of the Leftists on here who even bothered to watch that were more upset that little firecracker honey wasn't hugging those trees instead of shooting around them! You go Girl...Love it!!!!!
Click to expand...

WOW!!! That was awesome! Very impressive. Most impressed with her accuracy using the 9mm!
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
30CAT said:
WOW!!! That was awesome! Very impressive. Most impressed with her accuracy using the 9mm!
Click to expand...

I know some adults who can't shoot that well! My Brother is an ex- Marine D-I...he taught me how to line 'em up. She's had good training! Imagine if we taught our kids that instead of how Man causes "global warming"?
 
3

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,160
5,050
113
countryroads89 said:
Adaptability is the big thing with the AR. You can put a bump stock on it and it virtually becomes a fully-automatic rifle. You can interchange stocks and grips. You can get large capacity magazines and they are designed to fire a lot of rounds in a short period of time and not get the barrel as hot as other rifles.
Click to expand...

This is another prime example of ignorance from many of the anti-gunners.

1st, the AR isn't the only rifle capable of these things. ARs account for 2 of the 23 weapons used by the Vegas shooter. Do people really think he couldn't have pulled off mass killings without his ARs? Why not talk about the other 21 firearms he used? Because most anti-gunners don't have the basic knowledge of firearms, know how deadly other firearms can be and it doesn't fit their anti-gunner narrative.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,350
5,895
113
30CAT said:
This is another prime example of ignorance from many of the anti-gunners.

1st, the AR isn't the only rifle capable of these things. ARs account for 2 of the 23 weapons used by the Vegas shooter. Do people really think he couldn't have pulled off mass killings without his ARs? Why not talk about the other 21 firearms he used? Because most anti-gunners don't have the basic knowledge of firearms, know how deadly other firearms can be and it doesn't fit their anti-gunner narrative.
Click to expand...

If their emotions on the issue were replaced with facts they'd be gun owners instead of gun grabbers.
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
30CAT said:
This is another prime example of ignorance from many of the anti-gunners.

1st, the AR isn't the only rifle capable of these things. ARs account for 2 of the 23 weapons used by the Vegas shooter. Do people really think he couldn't have pulled off mass killings without his ARs? Why not talk about the other 21 firearms he used? Because most anti-gunners don't have the basic knowledge of firearms, know how deadly other firearms can be and it doesn't fit their anti-gunner narrative.
Click to expand...

From the sound in the video, those weren't AR's
 
W

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
Mntneer said:
Many of those are not "Parkland" or "Sandy Hook" shootings.

One was a fooking pellet gun or crying out loud.
Click to expand...

In my head, I don't categorize the recent one in MD (just a couple miles from where I used to live/work) as a "school shooting" really even though it did happen in a school. It seemed more along the lines of lover's quarrel or domestic violence that played out in a school.

It might be a distinction without a difference.
 
M

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Mntneer said:
Many of those are not "Parkland" or "Sandy Hook" shootings.

One was a fooking pellet gun or crying out loud.
Click to expand...

So it's only a school shooting when it fits your definition and multiple fatalities take place? Fear doesn't count? Ok......
 
W

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
Yet you ignore the point that 90% of their definition was aesthetics and has no impact on functionality or lethality. It was all based in something scary looking. Not surprised liberals support a return to it. Hahahahha
Click to expand...

I completely agree that this is an aesthetics only thing. Like I said before I had a semi-auto 22 when I was younger. But I do think it's the aesthetics that attract these people to the weapons. That's still a stupid reason to make a law about it, but I do seem some correlation. Correlation doesn't mean causation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom