I know, this is the NCAA, they don't require logic. But, I'm confused on the whole suspension thing because of his toying around with the 2008 NBA Draft. I've always thought that you are either A) an amateur or B) not an amateur. What gets the NCAA to the point where they say something to the effect "he was sorta an amateur, but not really - suspend him 9 games"? Shouldn't you either be declared eligible to play the entire season, or not eligible to play any of it?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not bitching about 9 games. It's immaterial for all practical purposes. I just don't understand the suspension logic in connection to amateur-status considerations.