Roe vs. Wade Overturned.
- Thread starter mrhotdice
- Start date
- Status
Workin’ on mysteries without any clues can lead to lots of problems.
Not true in the least. I'm in Florida. I emailed my republican congressman to give me any examples of this happening and I've heard crickets. On other issues he has had responses. Like critical race theory and Disney this is a chosen battle with no real merits and is used to manipulate the many lemmings they represent. Just like most repubs believe the election of Biden was stolen. Pretty pathetic actually.
I like the heartbeat laws. That is something everybody should understand. Abortion certainly isn't healthcare, 'do no harm'. If you're gonna do it, do it before there is a heartbeat. Reasonable compromise.
What designates a heartbeat? There is an electrical impulse days after conception but there is no heart at that point. Is that a heartbeat? Most doctors say no while most pro life advocates say yes.
Yawn.
Do you ever tire of being so derivative?
You've never had anything close to an original thought.
I would side with the doctors regarding this. Technically its a life immediately, but a visible heart, and audible heartbeat is what I am talking about. Something everybody can understand.
Few things beyond dispute:
Abortion was entirely judicially created right that exists nowhere in the constitution.
The ruling doesn't make abortion illegal. It's now to the states.
This should've always been a state issue. Tenth amendment is clear. The federal government was always supposed to have a small role in governance.
Abortion was entirely judicially created right that exists nowhere in the constitution.
The ruling doesn't make abortion illegal. It's now to the states.
This should've always been a state issue. Tenth amendment is clear. The federal government was always supposed to have a small role in governance.
I always enjoy the " I pretend to be sensible and impartial but will agree with and parrot every single leftist talking point" shtick.
You know the viewpoint of these people on every single topic. But I do enjoy the "I don't agree with mandates" but then later saying "I hope UK requires vaccination or you can't come." LOL. As long as the company who is politically influenced discriminates against you, it's fine, right?
You know the viewpoint of these people on every single topic. But I do enjoy the "I don't agree with mandates" but then later saying "I hope UK requires vaccination or you can't come." LOL. As long as the company who is politically influenced discriminates against you, it's fine, right?
You can yawn but he's clearly pointing out the mental gymnastics and contradictions of the left's dogma. But it's very entertaining to watch as the left navigates through ***** hats to "Trans women are women" and cheering on dudes beating women in sports, from "I can't even define what a woman is. I'm not a biologist" back to "WOMEN'S RIGHTS!" whenever politically convenient.
If someone wants to end their life who is Uncle Sam to tell them they can’t do that
Directed at select local loudmouths.
It only took till page 5 to get to the "Just stop being whores!" argument. That's not too shabby for this board.
You're conflating not answering one stupid gotcha question with not being able to actually define gender, sex, etc.
It's impossible to have an honest, intelligent conversation with people like Warriorcat because they resort to the most asinine talking points every time.
But by all means. Keep complaining about ***** hats and a swimmer who came in 5th place.
Such a lazy argument, only proves how weak of an argument you have.
That swimmer and many like that, have won many competitions.
You talk about having an honest conversation while the left now says "birthing people" and demands everyone pretends a dude is a woman. What is honest about that?
I'm not old, and I'm not always right nor do I think I am. However, you're entire argument is it's old white men doing this, and it's pathetic and divisive. You're intentionally creating a racial divide to enflame a situation.
Agreed! This is an exceptionally dangerous and sh!tty thing to do….. but it’s absolutely in keeping with the playbook of the left; no doubt cheered on by the leftist cuckolds on this thread.
I'm not going to get into an argument about if abortion is murder, but in this example you'd face charges in Oklahoma, because that's where the crime was committed, not in Texas. In the abortion example you would face charges in Texas. Those two scenarios are not the same.
This might be a good point if birth control was 100% effective. It's not even close. Saying any woman who get's pregnant against their wishes "didn't have the sense to practice birth control" is an incredibly ignorant view on the realities of sex.
And you purple haired feminazis think you’re wrong?
Pretty sure both sides of every issue think they’re right.
Dumb comment to make.
I’m sure there are pro-life females. I also bet there are some African American pro life females. Trying to corral people into divisive groups and not addressing issues is not productive to any conversation, especially one like this. JMO
Your name calling is also a dumb comment to make. Why not make your statement without the namecalling?
the point is that these laws are being made by predominantly older white men. Many times without considering the input of their constituents. We’ve seen that happen in KY where congress won’t vote on sports gambling when the vast majority of Kentuckians want it.
More fun?
The old white man comment is annoying and racist, so I figure giving it back a little is appropriate.
Its amazing how Thomas and now ACB are old white men…
I guess a prerequisite to being a minority and/or woman is you must first be a liberal…
The old white men comment is accurate since lawmakers are predominantly older white men. Ed never said that they are the only supporters.
What’s the male to female ratio of the Supreme Court? I think that’s a silly argument to make, I think the government and courts are very well represented by females. Aren’t you a guy? Why are you allowed to
have a say? It’s a very silly argument to separate people into groups and then try to invalidate opinions based on those groupings, especially considering how divisive and ineffective that strategy is. JMO
I said predominantly and the majority of Congress is older white men. It doesn’t mean they are the only members but they greatly outnumber others.
I said Congress who is making the laws. SCOTUS interprets the laws. There is a difference.
It’s a cop out, and yes it’s racist. Ones color does not make them automatically right or wrong. Plus this decision is not being made by just old white men, so it’s inaccurate to begin with.
- Status