Russell Wilson is a class act

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
Since Russell thinks God intervenes to help his team win football games why didn't Russell just tell God to intervene to save the kids life?
 
Last edited:

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Since Russell thinks God intervenes to help his team win football games why didn't Russell just tell God to intervene to save the kids life?

You're one angry atheist and take a great gesture by Wilson and diminish it. I can't think of a word other than despicable to describe you.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
You're one angry atheist and take a great gesture by Wilson and diminish it. I can't think of a word other than despicable to describe you.

I'm not diminishing it. It's a nice thing he did. It's not a nice thing he does when he says God helps him win football games. In fact I would think the people most pissed off when he does that would be believers in God. Someone that says God helps him win football games is being more demeaning to believers than is someone that says they don't believe God exists.

ETA: By the way, as far as being angry goes, tell me about your experiences of having to live life in the closet as a believer. We'll compare notes.
 

mule_eer

Member
May 6, 2002
20,438
58
48
I'm not diminishing it. It's a nice thing he did. It's not a nice thing he does when he says God helps him win football games. In fact I would think the people most pissed off when he does that would be believers in God. Someone that says God helps him win football games is being more demeaning to believers than is someone that says they don't believe God exists.

ETA: By the way, as far as being angry goes, tell me about your experiences of having to live life in the closet as a believer. We'll compare notes.
I don't know why believers would be angry about that. You're talking about an omniscient, omnipresent being. Theoretically, helping Russell Wilson on Sunday afternoon shouldn't impact God's ability to help anyone else do anything.

Having said that, many years ago I heard a comedian talking about post-game interviews. He pointed out that the winners often credited God for the outcome, and the losers blamed themselves. He said that just once he wanted to hear, "Well, we were in that game until Jesus made me fumble."
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Since Russell thinks God intervenes to help his team win football games why didn't Russell just tell God to intervene to save the kids life?

I understand your TIC comment and it is misplaced.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
I don't know why believers would be angry about that. You're talking about an omniscient, omnipresent being. Theoretically, helping Russell Wilson on Sunday afternoon shouldn't impact God's ability to help anyone else do anything.

Having said that, many years ago I heard a comedian talking about post-game interviews. He pointed out that the winners often credited God for the outcome, and the losers blamed themselves. He said that just once he wanted to hear, "Well, we were in that game until Jesus made me fumble."

The point isn't the helping a football team win taxes God's abilities, rather that saying that God spents Its time determining the outcome of football games trivializes God and that the idea that God especially wants your team to win is self-aggrandizing. It's basically saying "God likes me better than the other guy."
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,604
1,479
113
I'm not diminishing it. It's a nice thing he did. It's not a nice thing he does when he says God helps him win football games. In fact I would think the people most pissed off when he does that would be believers in God. Someone that says God helps him win football games is being more demeaning to believers than is someone that says they don't believe God exists.

ETA: By the way, as far as being angry goes, tell me about your experiences of having to live life in the closet as a believer. We'll compare notes.
The glory goes to him.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
You are a real miserable person.

You're free to chime in too on your experiences living life in the closet as a Christian. Christians sure seem to enjoy judging others who've path they've never had to endure despite that "Judge not lest ye be judged" bit in the Bible.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
You're free to chime in too on your experiences living life in the closet as a Christian. Christians sure seem to enjoy judging others who've path they've never had to endure despite that "Judge not lest ye be judged" bit in the Bible.

Russell Wilson has nothing to do with your life or your experiences. Why demean him and what he did for that dying child. Hate is a terrible thing to live with.
 

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,800
453
83
You're free to chime in too on your experiences living life in the closet as a Christian. Christians sure seem to enjoy judging others who've path they've never had to endure despite that "Judge not lest ye be judged" bit in the Bible.

You were the one doing the judging. I couldn't care less who or what you are or what closet you live in. But since you are the one who attacked Wilson, I had to point out what a intolerant person you really are.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
Russell Wilson has nothing to do with your life or your experiences. Why demean him and what he did for that dying child. Hate is a terrible thing to live with.

I didn't demean him for what he did with a dying child at all. As you know. Hate is a terrible thing to live with, as I'm sure you can attest. I did put him down for trivializing God though since it's silly to believe in an omnipotent Creator of the Universe and then ascribe to him events like the outcome of a football game.

I don't think it's a big sacrifice to do what he did though. If you could make a dying child feel really happy for awhile don't you think it would make you feel good?

Where I feel a bit sorry for Russell Wilson though is that for every one he does like in that story he probably has to pass up a half dozen because if he took all the requests he got to help sick kids and whatnot he'd have time to do nothing else. So when he does do one he probably thinks about the others he couldn't do and feels bad.
 

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,800
453
83
I didn't demean him for what he did with a dying child at all. As you know. Hate is a terrible thing to live with, as I'm sure you can attest. I did put him down for trivializing God though since it's silly to believe in an omnipotent Creator of the Universe and then ascribe to him events like the outcome of a football game.

I don't think it's a big sacrifice to do what he did though. If you could make a dying child feel really happy for awhile don't you think it would make you feel good?

Where I feel a bit sorry for Russell Wilson though is that for every one he does like in that story he probably has to pass up a half dozen because if he took all the requests he got to help sick kids and whatnot he'd have time to do nothing else. So when he does do one he probably thinks about the others he couldn't do and feels bad.

What Wilson thinks about God is his business. Why in the world would you care what Russell Wilson thinks. You need get your hate and prejudices out of Russell Wilson life. If he did something that hurt someone it would be a different story.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I didn't demean him for what he did with a dying child at all. As you know. Hate is a terrible thing to live with, as I'm sure you can attest. I did put him down for trivializing God though since it's silly to believe in an omnipotent Creator of the Universe and then ascribe to him events like the outcome of a football game.

I don't think it's a big sacrifice to do what he did though. If you could make a dying child feel really happy for awhile don't you think it would make you feel good?

Where I feel a bit sorry for Russell Wilson though is that for every one he does like in that story he probably has to pass up a half dozen because if he took all the requests he got to help sick kids and whatnot he'd have time to do nothing else. So when he does do one he probably thinks about the others he couldn't do and feels bad.
That you would say the thing first is not bad enough. Then give multiple reason to defend it is just too much. Can you ever...... ?
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,604
1,479
113
You're free to chime in too on your experiences living life in the closet as a Christian. Christians sure seem to enjoy judging others who've path they've never had to endure despite that "Judge not lest ye be judged" bit in the Bible.
You sure do have that victim **** down to a tee. An atheist living in the closet is laughable and demeans the struggles gays have faced for something they were born into and not a choice. Cut the ****, link me a story where an atheist was beaten to death by a gang of Christians just for not believing in a God. Unless you grew up in Saudia Arabia enough with the living in the closet ****. If you were scared to speak out its only because you lacked testicular fortitude. Weak willed individual. Epitome of what conservatives see liberal white men as.. I bet you are henpecked and drive a minivan. Wife probably dresses you.
 

wvpackog

Active member
May 29, 2001
20,723
429
83
You're free to chime in too on your experiences living life in the closet as a Christian. Christians sure seem to enjoy judging others who've path they've never had to endure despite that "Judge not lest ye be judged" bit in the Bible.
Actually Christians are instructed to judge those inside the church or those claiming to be Christians. In the same breath they instructed not to judge those outside the church. Those outside of a relationship with Jesus Christ are to be judged by God. So only those who claim to be followers of Christ should be judged by the church. In verse 9 Paul is speaking to those who are doing those things within the church. Verse 12-13 speaks of those outside the church.

1 Corinthians 5

9 I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10 Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.

12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”[d]
 

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,800
453
83
I need to ask Op2 a question. How in the hell did you forget to mention Tim Tebow in you comments?
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
I need to ask Op2 a question. How in the hell did you forget to mention Tim Tebow in you comments?

The thread is about Russell Wilson. I just noted how its obnoxious for Wilson to say that God helps him win football games. I'm not the only one to do that this week, Aaron Rodgers did it too after the Packers beat the Seahawks, and Aaron Rodgers is a Christian.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
Actually Christians are instructed to judge those inside the church or those claiming to be Christians. In the same breath they instructed not to judge those outside the church. Those outside of a relationship with Jesus Christ are to be judged by God. So only those who claim to be followers of Christ should be judged by the church. In verse 9 Paul is speaking to those who are doing those things within the church. Verse 12-13 speaks of those outside the church.

1 Corinthians 5

9 I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10 Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.

12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”[d]

Okay then, I'm outside the church and the people in this thread inside the church are judging me, do me a favor and tell them to stop.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Okay then, I'm outside the church and the people in this thread inside the church are judging me, do me a favor and tell them to stop.

I'm not judging, I'm observing. You're an angry, hate filled person. That is obvious from your posts on this topic.
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,604
1,479
113
Okay then, I'm outside the church and the people in this thread inside the church are judging me, do me a favor and tell them to stop.
I'm not in the church. I'm agnostic at best and I think you are being an ***.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
I'm not in the church. I'm agnostic at best and I think you are being an ***.

I didn't say you were in the church. You posted stuff saying people in the church are supposed to judge others in the church but not those outside the church. I'm outside the church so those in the church aren't supposed to judge me. So tell them that, regardless of whether you're in the church.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Says the guy that gets pissed off about every topic conceivably connected to politics up to and including the Pope saying the rich should help the poor.

I've never ripped the Pope for wanting to help the poor. Neither socialism nor communism helps the poor. The Pope seems to be a socialist.

Also, I don't hate liberalism, I just think it's a wrong ideology.
 

mule_eer

Member
May 6, 2002
20,438
58
48
I've never ripped the Pope for wanting to help the poor. Neither socialism nor communism helps the poor. The Pope seems to be a socialist.

Also, I don't hate liberalism, I just think it's a wrong ideology.
He's not a fan of trickle down. I don't think that necessarily implies he's a socialist.

As for whether socialism helps the poor, I think that's up for debate. A lot depends on the degree of socialism, but a higher degree of socialism equals higher tax rates. I think that a reasonable argument could be made that socialism helps the poor, but the trade off is a flattening of the middle due to the increased taxation needed to support.
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,604
1,479
113
I didn't say you were in the church. You posted stuff saying people in the church are supposed to judge others in the church but not those outside the church. I'm outside the church so those in the church aren't supposed to judge me. So tell them that, regardless of whether you're in the church.
I posted no such thing. I merely said "The glory goes to Him" which is absolutely true for anyone of faith. I have no faith and therefore I earn all of my glory. I think you are throwing faux victim status out there to justify your intolerance of another person's faith. You are cloaking your bigotry in being a victim. Classic liberal tactic. You have it down.
 

DvlDog4WVU

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2008
46,604
1,479
113
He's not a fan of trickle down. I don't think that necessarily implies he's a socialist.

As for whether socialism helps the poor, I think that's up for debate. A lot depends on the degree of socialism, but a higher degree of socialism equals higher tax rates. I think that a reasonable argument could be made that socialism helps the poor, but the trade off is a flattening of the middle due to the increased taxation needed to support.
He is from Argentina originally I believe and very much believes in the redistribution of wealth.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
I posted no such thing. I merely said "The glory goes to Him" which is absolutely true for anyone of faith. I have no faith and therefore I earn all of my glory. I think you are throwing faux victim status out there to justify your intolerance of another person's faith. You are cloaking your bigotry in being a victim. Classic liberal tactic. You have it down.

wvpack posted #18 and I responded to him in #22. You responded to me in #27 and I since I had already responded to him I assumed it was him responding back to me instead of someone else.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
He's not a fan of trickle down. I don't think that necessarily implies he's a socialist.

As for whether socialism helps the poor, I think that's up for debate. A lot depends on the degree of socialism, but a higher degree of socialism equals higher tax rates. I think that a reasonable argument could be made that socialism helps the poor, but the trade off is a flattening of the middle due to the increased taxation needed to support.

The Pope is far more than just being against trickle down economics:

But now Pope Francis seems to be embracing a condemnation of capitalism instead, and an embracing of socialistic principles. Here are some statements from his text on Tuesday:

Today everything comes under the laws of competition and the survival of the fittest, where the powerful feed upon the powerless. As a consequence, masses of people find themselves excluded and marginalized:

… some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system.

One cause of this situation is found in our relationship with money, since we calmly accept its dominion over ourselves and our societies. The current financial crisis can make us overlook the fact that it originated in a profound human crisis: the denial of the primacy of the human person!

While the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially, so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new tyranny is thus born…

So Francis believes that capitalism, which defends the right to a free market system, is to be discarded, while the right of states, “charged with vigilance for the common good,” to exercise control over the economic status of the people, is laudable.

You may want to ask the Venezuelans if socialism helps the poor. I can't think of a country where the state controls the means of production where the poor are better off than the U.S. poor. In Europe, we generally have democratic socialistic countries, very high taxes but the government only controls those industries deemed vital to the state. By and large, the poor in the U.S. are better off than the poor in Europe. And by almost any measure, the U.S. economy outperforms the vast majority of European countries even though the U.S. is much larger and much more diverse, meaning we have a much more robust middle class since many European countries with much lower GDP have much higher unemployment.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timwors...ive-better-than-most-of-the-rest-of-humanity/


Read More Stories About:[/QUOTE]
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
Okay then, I'm outside the church and the people in this thread inside the church are judging me, do me a favor and tell them to stop.

Discernment and judgment are two very distinct things. Learn the difference.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I'm not attacking anyone's faith. Everyone should have the freedom to practice their faith; it's in the First Amendment in our Constitution. With that said, I do agree that it's foolish to say "God was the reason we won that game..." or something to that effect. More than likely there are Christians on the other team. Other than keeping everyone safe, God really doesn't care about football games, even though we do.
 

dave

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
167,927
721
113
Since Russell thinks God intervenes to help his team win football games why didn't Russell just tell God to intervene to save the kids life?
You are a pathetic piece of ****.
 

dave

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
167,927
721
113
Matthew 5:44
Nothing more hypocritical than an avowed atheist hiding behind scripture. Jesus kicked hypocrits asses. I am cutting you a break and calling a spade a spade. You dont believe in God so you dont believe the bible is gods word so excuse me if i think your argument is pathetic since you dont even believe it. Science calls you illogical so now my god and your god both mock you.
 

op2

Active member
Mar 16, 2014
10,851
133
53
Nothing more hypocritical than an avowed atheist hiding behind scripture. Jesus kicked hypocrits asses. I am cutting you a break and calling a spade a spade. You dont believe in God so you dont believe the bible is gods word so excuse me if i think your argument is pathetic since you dont even believe it. Science calls you illogical so now my god and your god both mock you.

I don't believe in God but that doesn't mean I think everything in the Bible is bad. I think some of it is good. Words don't come much better than "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."