Basketball Rutgers MBB fails to make NCAA Tournament

Loyal_2RU

Heisman
Aug 6, 2001
14,953
10,489
113
Not justified. And the had OkSU ahead of us.

Championships are about winning, not not losing. Committee emphasis is just wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

RutgersChow

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
2,945
2,459
0
Lots of home games
The system just blowsl. Beat PSU twice, a ten seed, MSU, a seven seed, and Purdue at their place when they were No. 1. Absurd. It's all just total BS. Screw this committee. When will others start talking about how the process sucks?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal-Son

RUTrack94

All-American
Nov 15, 2008
11,348
5,176
113
The system just blowsl. Beat PSU twice, a ten seed, MSU, a seven seed, and Purdue at their place when they were No. 1. Absurd. It's all just total BS. Screw this committee. When will others start talking about how the process sucks?
Temple, Nebraska, Minny … lost to bottom 3 teams in conference.

Pike won’t turn down the NIT.
 
Sep 29, 2006
2,050
629
0
Could be the biggest choke job ever to end a season. Too bad. We really picked up these last 2 games and figured out the mag thing. Too bad we didn’t swap Simpson for Hyatt sooner.
 

NYSportsFan

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2004
2,047
1,059
0
Temple, Nebraska, Minny … lost to bottom 3 teams in conference.

Pike won’t turn down the NIT.


The problem is the process is arbitrary. Metrics have changed but it’s all subjective. Theres guidelines but no clear rule (I.e teams 1-50 in NET should be considered over xyz or Road wins count for 2 pts vs home wins etc etc). Like take WVU. Zero good road wins outside of at Pitt and they r a 9 haha. So if we won all our home games like they did vs ranked teams but lost road games like they did, are we s 9? Based on the metrics and schedule and results we should be. That’s the issue with the whole process. They introduce more metrics and it’s still arbitrary. And I say this as a guy who works for Stats Inc and does sports stats for a living haha. Like one day it’s “how they performed in their last 10” next it’s “key injuries” next year it’s “road wins” like it changes every single committee. Sucks but we know what we did wrong, can’t lose to Nebraska and Minnesota, not rocket science.
 

RutgersSam

All-Conference
Nov 6, 2004
6,507
1,780
0
In the end, the warts on Rutgers’ resume – principally four Quad 3 losses, an unprecedented amount for an at-large selection – held the day. A non-conference stretch of schedule ranked 342s out of 363 teams surely didn’t help, either. Rutgers has played a soft non-conference schedule since Steve Pikiell took the reins in 2016, but this is he first time it's broken against the Scarlet Knights in a tangible way.

-Carino
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewbagel423

rucoe89

All-American
Jul 31, 2001
12,273
5,909
113
He tried but they didnt produce.
A team with just 1 shooter at this level is a problem because you don't have any real offense beyond a U-13 offense. Pikiell needs to hold onto his recruits now because the team needs better talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersSam

ScottRU93

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2003
2,365
2,454
0
Are we in jeopardy of losing Bailey etc? Does a kid like that go to a NIT team?
 

ScottRU93

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2003
2,365
2,454
0
Well then I guess Villanova and UNC should surrender all their 5 stars.
Bottom line, we arent Nova or UNC. Not close from a blue bloods perspective. I hope we dont but who knows what goes through these recruits minds and who is in their ears