Saudis blocking "9/11" law are the first to grease Donnie's palms

WVMade

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2016
1,221
0
0
A lobbying firm working for Saudi Arabia paid for a room at Donald Trump’s Washington hotel after Inauguration Day, marking the first publicly known payment on behalf of a foreign government to a Trump property since he became president.

Qorvis MSLGroup, a communications firm that lobbies for the Saudis, has been organizing veterans and other activists to come to Washington to urge Congress to repeal the law letting 9/11 victims’ families sue the kingdom. Between 20 and 40 veterans, with the assistance of the advocacy group NMLB, stayed at the Trump International Hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue in December and January.




One of those veterans checked in on Jan. 23 and left on Jan. 26 at a rate of $250 to $325 a night plus tax, according to NMLB president Jason Johns. The bill was paid by Michael Gibson, a subcontractor to Qorvis representing the Saudis, according to disclosures filed with the Justice Department.


The Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits U.S. officials from receiving payments from foreign governments. Lawyers started warning about the potential for violations at Trump’s Washington hotel and overseas properties after he won the election, but the clause didn’t start applying to Trump until he took office on Jan. 20.


The Jan. 23-26 hotel stay paid by the Saudis raises questions about whether it represents a violation of the foreign emoluments clause.


“The problem with Donald Trump’s constitutionally forbidden foreign government cash and other benefits is not just that any one particular payment is problematic — it’s also a systemic problem,” said Norm Eisen, who was President Barack Obama’s ethics czar and is now part of a lawsuit accusing Trump of violation the Emoluments Clause. “It’s another tile in the mosaic of unconstitutional behavior.”
 

WVMade

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2016
1,221
0
0
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
A lobbying firm working for Saudi Arabia paid for a room at Donald Trump’s Washington hotel after Inauguration Day, marking the first publicly known payment on behalf of a foreign government to a Trump property since he became president.

Qorvis MSLGroup, a communications firm that lobbies for the Saudis, has been organizing veterans and other activists to come to Washington to urge Congress to repeal the law letting 9/11 victims’ families sue the kingdom. Between 20 and 40 veterans, with the assistance of the advocacy group NMLB, stayed at the Trump International Hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue in December and January.




One of those veterans checked in on Jan. 23 and left on Jan. 26 at a rate of $250 to $325 a night plus tax, according to NMLB president Jason Johns. The bill was paid by Michael Gibson, a subcontractor to Qorvis representing the Saudis, according to disclosures filed with the Justice Department.


The Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits U.S. officials from receiving payments from foreign governments. Lawyers started warning about the potential for violations at Trump’s Washington hotel and overseas properties after he won the election, but the clause didn’t start applying to Trump until he took office on Jan. 20.


The Jan. 23-26 hotel stay paid by the Saudis raises questions about whether it represents a violation of the foreign emoluments clause.


“The problem with Donald Trump’s constitutionally forbidden foreign government cash and other benefits is not just that any one particular payment is problematic — it’s also a systemic problem,” said Norm Eisen, who was President Barack Obama’s ethics czar and is now part of a lawsuit accusing Trump of violation the Emoluments Clause. “It’s another tile in the mosaic of unconstitutional behavior.”

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here this time. However, there are many 5 star hotels in DC. Why doesn't the Trump organization just not take any business from foreign governments? Should be simple right? Does he thinks he is exempt from the rules. You think he might hire somebody to make sure he doesn't slip up??
 
Last edited:

WVMade

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2016
1,221
0
0
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here this time. However, there are many 5 star hotels in DC. Why doesn't the Trump organization just not take any business from foreign governments? Should be simple right? Does he thinks he is exempt from the rules. You think he might hire somebody to make sure he doesn't slip up??
The money is a pittance and not worthy of discussion. The flagrant disregard for the Emoluments Clause and of the Constitution is a serious issue. It say's everything about Trump and his attitude towards the rules that bind him. He doesn't give a **** what The Constitution say's. He's above it.. in his own eyes and those of his fans.
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
The money is a pittance and not worthy of discussion. The flagrant disregard for the Emoluments Clause and of the Constitution is a serious issue. It say's everything about Trump and his attitude towards the rules that bind him. He doesn't give a **** what The Constitution say's. He's above it.. in his own eyes and those of his fans.

I wonder how long it will take him to learn/understand that the US government is not Trump Enterprises?
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
Chirp? I think you're confusing silence with refusal to reply to another of your unworthy offerings.

That is actually funny. Seemed odd that a liberal president would not allow US Citizens to sue. But equally odd, to me anyway, that conservative law makers were hell bent on allowing citizens to sue Saudi Arabia.
 

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
That is actually funny. Seemed odd that a liberal president would not allow US Citizens to sue. But equally odd, to me anyway, that conservative law makers were hell bent on allowing citizens to sue Saudi Arabia.
Yeah, that was kind of weird. Obama pretty much got plowed by both sides of the aisle on that one. It may be meaningless anyway.
 

WVMade

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2016
1,221
0
0
Chirp? I think you're confusing silence with refusal to reply to another of your unworthy offerings.
I think you are confusing "silence" and "refusal" with "I'll reply with cute meme denying it's a reply". [laughing]