Scalia found dead.

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
I do not deny that at all, but why do you ask me to refrain when you know that I am doing it in response. I have never taken the lead in any of the exchanges, but you ask ME to tone it down. Why would you make a distinction? I will certainly give your request consideration if you will have the integrity to give me and honest response.
Becasue you are a racist piece of **** who decided to bring my son into this. And my Black cousins. So, I'll continue to taunt your ugly, fat, old *** until I feel like not taunting you. *******
 

rog1187

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
69,536
4,665
113
Becasue you are a racist piece of **** who decided to bring my son into this. And my Black cousins. So, I'll continue to taunt your ugly, fat, old *** until I feel like not taunting you. *******
Missed that part - yeah family should be left out of these type of discussions.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I agree that shouldn't be done but one particular person has put my name, Bud's, doc's and possibly others out there. Don't recall you ever sayihg anything about that. Why is that?
Bru, sayihg is not a proper word. And if he was wrong, why did you not take the first step?. You have taken the lead previously to point out that I should not say or do something, all the while knowing 3P initiates the exchanges, but you fail to step into his ****. If you deny, you lie. Have you become a victim like 3P? OK to stand up for friends, but you become void of character when you go this far.
 
Last edited:

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,813
465
83
I do not deny that at all, but why do you ask me to refrain when you know that I am doing it in response. I have never taken the lead in any of the exchanges, but you ask ME to tone it down. Why would you make a distinction? I will certainly give your request consideration if you will have the integrity to give me and honest response.

Its because since I have been on this board I have see you as the one that gets really personal and brings up other posters family members. Look, I get into it with the guy even when I have tried to pay him a compliment. I could post I agree with a post he made and the next minute we could be calling each other ********. But I understand how it is and I let it pass. I sometimes even get a good laugh out if it.
 
Last edited:

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
As usual you have shown yourself to be the idiot. It is a fact that several Democrat leaders DID voice that intent. Again in case you can't quite deal with the facts, it did happen. My claim is that some Dem leaders USED that blocking rhetoric. I NEVER claimed the Dems would never approve a Reagan nominee. Have a good night....*******.
Apparently you don't recall what you actually claimed. Let me help. You posted:

"What else would you expect them to say? Do you remember what happened in 1987 when Justice Powell retired? I doubt you know what happened so let me refresh your memory. Senate Democrats asked liberal leaders to form "a solid phalanx" to oppose whomever Reagan nominated to replace him. It's called politics and it works both ways."

And that is not what happened. Alan Cranston "urged colleagues in a letter to form a ''solid phalanx'' of opposition if the President's nominee was an ideological extremist." per the NY Times. That is hardly " whomever Reagan nominated" as you claimed. And, as has been pointed out to you, Reagan nominated Kennedy who was indeed unanimously approved by a Democratically controlled Senate. This is what happens when you rely on Wikipedia as your source. So, who's the idiot?[roll]:flush:
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/06/30/us/byrd-says-bork-nomination-would-face-senate-trouble.html
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
And you people condemn me for responding to this wannabe black monkey. Do you not see that he extracts the words that you detest, but he knows I will use to describe him. He is the racist and has always been - but you continue to deny it for the nig bastard.

Is it possible the good people who are so offended by my words are the one who keeps giving him encouragement? I will certainly not quit. No ********** has beaten me in 75 years, and this one is not going to b

And, in your infinite wisdom, how in hell do you equate dropping my name when someone else used yours?. You stupid bastard, you attempt to justify every imbecilic thing you do. You are plain damned stupid when you attempt to explain away your **** in this method. Unfortunately, you think you are getting away with your continued attempt by calling others derogatory names.
You are an embarrassment to this board and all WVU fans. I have completely exposed you for what you truly are-a racist piece of ****. You should crawl into a hole somewhere and go to sleep-forever.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Missed that part - yeah family should be left out of these type of discussions.
Damn, Rog. I have denied this for two or three years because it is a lie. He mentions it one time, and you "Missed that part- family should be left out....". I gave two detailed explainations about how those claims came about over the weekend. He is lying, and you instantly give him credibility. Why in hell did you do it? I am sure he has lied to and about you on this board, and yet you believe him and disbelieve me. All I can do is tell you the truth, so help me God. I have no explanation for you taking the word of a lying atheist over a God fearing man. I guess it is what it is.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Damn, Rog. I have denied this for two or three years because it is a lie. He mentions it one time, and you "Missed that part- family should be left out....". I gave two detailed explainations about how those claims came about over the weekend. He is lying, and you instantly give him credibility. Why in hell did you do it? I am sure he has lied to and about you on this board, and yet you believe him and disbelieve me. All I can do is tell you the truth, so help me God. I have no explanation for you taking the word of a lying atheist over a God fearing man. I guess it is what it is.
born just called you out saying he's see you do it. And he's been an ally of yours, you dumbass. Liar.
 

rog1187

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
69,536
4,665
113
Damn, Rog. I have denied this for two or three years because it is a lie. He mentions it one time, and you "Missed that part- family should be left out....". I gave two detailed explainations about how those claims came about over the weekend. He is lying, and you instantly give him credibility. Why in hell did you do it? I am sure he has lied to and about you on this board, and yet you believe him and disbelieve me. All I can do is tell you the truth, so help me God. I have no explanation for you taking the word of a lying atheist over a God fearing man. I guess it is what it is.
All be more clear - personal information and family should be left out of discussions by all...it becomes a slippery slope and nasty if it gets out of control and the next thing you know, this board is shut down.

I don't know if I read your explanations - are they in this thread?
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Its because since I have been on this board I have see you as the one that gets really personal and brings up other posters family members
Would you be more specific. This has been going on for a few years between me and this individual. Other people have joined in and I have responded to them. I have given explanations this week about the names and lies offered by this ******* over the years. What did I say about the family of other persons specifically. I have got to be pressed pretty hard to do what you are suggesting. Give me names, dates or instances and research. For the time being , I am going to question what you are offering.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Would you be more specific. This has been going on for a few years between me and this individual. Other people have joined in and I have responded to them. I have given explanations this week about the names and lies offered by this ******* over the years. What did I say about the family of other persons specifically. I have got to be pressed pretty hard to do what you are suggesting. Give me names, dates or instances and research. For the time being , I am going to question what you are offering.
 

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,813
465
83
Alan Cranston "urged colleagues in a letter to form a ''solid phalanx'' of opposition if the President's nominee was an ideological extremist." per the NY Times. That is hardly " whomever Reagan nominated" as you claimed.

I was correct. Bork was Borked because a ''solid phalanx'' of opposition did him in. The phrase turned out to be correct because it did indeed happen.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You are an embarrassment to this board and all WVU fans. I have completely exposed you for what you truly are-a racist piece of ****. You should crawl into a hole somewhere and go to sleep-forever.
And why should you be believed in this instance when everything else you say and do is to brag about what you see as how great you are and you lie about everything else. You are a self avowed ********** and bragged openly about it proudly. You gave me credit(incorrectly) for someone else calling your son a *** got. I had not begun to post here in the time frame you had gotten under someone else's skin. Vernon removed you from the site and I was new at the time you were assuming a new name to be renewed. I used black in a sentence to describe some friends, and you were under some of you narcotics and went all to hell calling me a racist and telling about your black cousins.

I have tried to get away from you , but you have become my stalker. I have done everything I know, but you show right back up with every post with this ****, and hiding under a screen name. Now you think you are J. Fred Muggs and a wannabe.
 

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,813
465
83
Would you be more specific. This has been going on for a few years between me and this individual. Other people have joined in and I have responded to them. I have given explanations this week about the names and lies offered by this ******* over the years. What did I say about the family of other persons specifically. I have got to be pressed pretty hard to do what you are suggesting. Give me names, dates or instances and research. For the time being , I am going to question what you are offering.

This is the last thing I'm going to say on this. Maybe I should have said a poster instead of OTHER posters family members. I have only seen you refer to RPJ's family members in a despicable manner.
 
Last edited:

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,813
465
83
"whomever reagan nominated" Question: Did Reagan nominate Kennedy?

Yes, But in the case of the first nominee Bork, it turned out to be correct. You also have to keep in mind that other Democrats had concerns. I guess the word "whomever" is the problem you have. To me that depends on context and interpretation.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
All be more clear - personal information and family should be left out of discussions by all...it becomes a slippery slope and nasty if it gets out of control and the next thing you know, this board is shut down.

I don't know if I read your explanations - are they in this thread?
I don't know, I have busy all weekend fighting 3-4 of his assassins . Hell, it gets tiring, when he starts this **** with every post and then some of his followers chime in. But, I cannot let him win. he is a liar and without any core principles, and it gets doubly upsetting when someone like you get into the middle of it and buy his victim story.

For the family, consider the derogatory remarks he and his cronies had to offer about my wife who had just died and had her services. I would have killed all the sons of bitches if the cowardly bastards had not been hiding behind a screen name. A couple weeks later they start all this **** again. But what the hell, they are having great fun at my expense because they know that I get riled up still.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
This is the last thing I'm going to say on this. I don't think I said you posted things about OTHER posters family members. I have only seen you refer to RPJ's family members in a despicable manner.
And that is not accurate. He incorrectly said I called his son a *** got for over two years. After I had heard enough, I finally told him I would agree if he was going to insist that he had a *** got for a son. And, if he was digging too hard, I may have included all his family and friends and maybe dog. It has been going on too long and he continues stalk me only because he is having fun at my expense while he hides behind a screen name.
 

bornaneer

Active member
Jan 23, 2014
29,813
465
83
And that is not accurate. He incorrectly said I called his son a *** got for over two years. After I had heard enough, I finally told him I would agree if he was going to insist that he had a *** got for a son. And, if he was digging too hard, I may have included all his family and friends and maybe dog. It has been going on too long and he continues stalk me only because he is having fun at my expense while he hides behind a screen name.

I suggest you take Vernons advice and hit the "ignore" button.
 

ColoradoMountaineer

New member
Sep 2, 2007
2,670
98
0
And that is not accurate. He incorrectly said I called his son a *** got for over two years. After I had heard enough, I finally told him I would agree if he was going to insist that he had a *** got for a son. And, if he was digging too hard, I may have included all his family and friends and maybe dog. It has been going on too long and he continues stalk me only because he is having fun at my expense while he hides behind a screen name.

you probably did I've seen you call people all sorts of things on here
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
After Bork was blocked by the Democrats and Ginsburg withdrew.

And it took over 7 months to fill that seat.

Obama puts up a radical... he will be blocked.
Obama could put up Jesus Christ and the GOP will block it.

There are many very qualified but that doesn't matter when you are dealing with hatred and unreasonable acts. That is what your side has.

I will tell you what will be worse for the GOP and that is not allow Obama fill the seat with a qualified person and one of these numbnuts win the Presidency. The first thing they will have to do is go through filling the seat along with their other appointments, It will be ridiculously nasty and will set this country back even further than what it already is. And that will affect anything and everything else this President will attempt to do.
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
Damn, Rog. I have denied this for two or three years because it is a lie. He mentions it one time, and you "Missed that part- family should be left out....". I gave two detailed explainations about how those claims came about over the weekend. He is lying, and you instantly give him credibility. Why in hell did you do it? I am sure he has lied to and about you on this board, and yet you believe him and disbelieve me. All I can do is tell you the truth, so help me God. I have no explanation for you taking the word of a lying atheist over a God fearing man. I guess it is what it is.
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
He deserves it. People like that shouldn't be allowed to post. I'm glad I'm not a paying member. I would demand a refund. I certainly wouldn't pay to come see that ****.
It isn't he deserves it or not. Vernon has said several times that he isn't going to babysit this board and the members will have to self-govern what goes on here. There are certain lines that shouldn't be crossed. Making nasty references to family members, making very vulgar references and being socially unacceptable with racists posts are some of the lines. Posting a name or contact information in anger of another poster is another line that should not be crossed. It has happened in the past and nothing has happened to those that have done it and I don't think anything will happen this time either. Doesn't make it right. Personally, I hope it never happens again along with the other improper behavior but I'm smart enough to know it will.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
After Bork was blocked by the Democrats and Ginsburg withdrew.

And it took over 7 months to fill that seat.

Obama puts up a radical... he will be blocked.
And that would be fine. But the point is, Mcconnell and virtually every GOP Presidential candidate including two US Senators, as well as the chairman of the Judiciary cmmte have all said that it is too late in BO's term for him to nominate anyone-a nomination for the vacancy should come from the next President which they are obviously hoping is a Republican. This is why our govt is in gridlock. To these GOP ideologues (and who in the party today isn't) it's their way or the highway. It's a crying shame that they have decided that they won't even consider an Obama appointee. Childish. Par for the course.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
These idiot Republicans (blocking the nomination) need to remember that it is a Presidential election year. All those voters out there riding the fence on the Presidential election will weigh in on the childish ********.
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
These idiot Republicans (blocking the nomination) need to remember that it is a Presidential election year. All those voters out there riding the fence on the Presidential election will weigh in on the childish ********.

I'm sure you can speak for said fencesitters. You're clearly unbiased.
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
Just like they didn't think shutting down the government was a bad idea. [laughing]

Again, population of fencesitters was 2. Everyone who cares knows where they stand. I'm not defending the actions or inactions. Your argument about fencesitters doesn't hold water.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Again, population of fencesitters was 2. Everyone who cares knows where they stand. I'm not defending the actions or inactions. Your argument about fencesitters doesn't hold water.
Horseshit. As you know, the Democrats have won the popular vote in 5 or the last 6 elections. What the GOP has been selling hasn't been received very well. Many of those who voted in those 6 elections don't identify with either party. I mean, you can look it up. If the GOP thinks these high profile obstructionist tactics will work to their benefit in the upcoming Presidential election, then you are even dumber than I already thought. No offense. :wink:
 

TarHeelEer

New member
Dec 15, 2002
89,280
37
0
Horseshit. As you know, the Democrats have won the popular vote in 5 or the last 6 elections. What the GOP has been selling hasn't been received very well. Many of those who voted in those 6 elections don't identify with either party. I mean, you can look it up. If the GOP thinks these high profile obstructionist tactics will work to their benefit in the upcoming Presidential election, then you are even dumber than I already thought. No offense. :wink:

Nothing you said even relates to what Country said, nor my denial of his statement. So Ok. I've been saying for years I don't relate to GOP, that I relate to libertarian. I don't care much what the GOP has been selling, I'm not buying much of it.

Regardless of all that, if someone cares enough to know any details about politics, they aren't a fencesitter. Opinions are formed almost as soon as propaganda is swallowed.

None taken, never have.
 

rog1187

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
69,536
4,665
113
He deserves it. People like that shouldn't be allowed to post. I'm glad I'm not a paying member. I would demand a refund. I certainly wouldn't pay to come see that ****.
I would disagree - there is no reason to put personal information out there. Now if a poster puts it out there themself, then I'm not sure they have much of a leg to stand on later if somoene mentions it. Pretty simple IMO - keep the comments to the people on this board and do not bring in family members or other personal information.
 

rog1187

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
69,536
4,665
113
Horseshit. As you know, the Democrats have won the popular vote in 5 or the last 6 elections. What the GOP has been selling hasn't been received very well. Many of those who voted in those 6 elections don't identify with either party. I mean, you can look it up. If the GOP thinks these high profile obstructionist tactics will work to their benefit in the upcoming Presidential election, then you are even dumber than I already thought. No offense. :wink:
And as you know the GOP holds both the Senate and the HoR...so apparently someone is buying what they are selling.
 

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
I would disagree - there is no reason to put personal information out there. Now if a poster puts it out there themself, then I'm not sure they have much of a leg to stand on later if somoene mentions it. Pretty simple IMO - keep the comments to the people on this board and do not bring in family members or other personal information.
I have no regrets in exposing a flaming racist. His racist posts are indefensible. He should be shamed. He is like David Duke-an unapologetic racist. I can tolerate his calling my son a "***". That's a pretty childish response for a simple-minded moron who everyone can see for what it is. But his continued use of monkey comparisons, use of "nig", racist comments toward my family who is biracial, etc merit his exposure. It is he who decided to make these posts. So, your opinion is noted. ButI have plenty of other ammo to shame the old man too should I be prompted to use it.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
And as you know the GOP holds both the Senate and the HoR...so apparently someone is buying what they are selling.

Good point, but, Trump leads the GOP polls right now. It isn't because he's a great Republican, it's because people just want change. People are "boycotting" so to speak.