SEC AD Responds To ACC/Big Ten/Pac-12 ‘Alliance’ Report

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,324
238
63
With the additions of Oklahoma and Texas, college football could be becoming the SEC vs. the world. That may become a reality, with the recent report that the ACC, Big Ten, and Pac-12 are in discussions about a potential conference “alliance.”

Commissioners George Kliavkoff (Pac-12), Kevin Warren (Big Ten) and Jim Phillips (ACC) have been in regular communication, and have also had some in-person discussions,” ESPN’s Adam Rittenberg wrote. “Kliavkoff and Warren were together this week for Rose Bowl meetings. Pac-12 sources said all three commissioners met last week in Chicago.”


The details are not clear about what this would mean, but most figure we could see some big-money non-conference matchups to drive more revenue. With the SEC’s upcoming media rights negotiations, and the addition of two of the sport’s biggest programs, they’re set to jump to a ridiculous level of revenue per team. The other leagues understandably want to keep pace, and the fact that those schools would comprise 41 votes on major matters in the sport vs. the 16 SEC members is significant.

It doesn’t sound like the SEC is overly concerned though. “We’ll play each other, they’ll play each other. Who wins and loses there?” one SEC athletic director told Matt Hayes.



While the SEC would have plenty of really attractive games, the best of the ACC, Big Ten, and Pac-12 could make for some really cool games every year between them.

This also presents some concerns about other non-conference games involving SEC teams. It would be a real shame if the sport fractures to the point where we don’t see great games between these two sides before the College Football Playoff.

 

michaelwalkerbr

New member
Jan 28, 2013
7,084
125
0
In only 5 years someone may mention OK and UT by asking, "They're in the SEC, right? They used to be pretty good teams and OK was even in the playoffs, I wonder what happened?" And the answer may be, "Well OK is still in the second tier, but Texas kind of disappeared in the bottom half. It used to be Texas this and Oklahoma that. Now you hear a lot more about Texas Tech and Oklahoma State. Weird how things change like that."
 

KingCoal

New member
Jul 20, 2009
9,228
0
0
Moving to the SEC is a great decision by Texas. It's not as if Texas is able to win either conference, so why not make even more money while being an also-ran?
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
Looking more and more like Tiny8 are gonna get screwed. Except for WVU, Oklahoma State, TCU and a lucky 4th potentially.
 

SeronimusPratt

Active member
Jun 19, 2001
24,935
138
53
Moving to the SEC is a great decision by Texas. It's not as if Texas is able to win either conference, so why not make even more money while being an also-ran?
Texas is like a golfer that shoots a 97 at a public course, can buy a $2000 set of clubs and be OK with shooting a 156 at Augusta
 

Pitt4Life34

New member
Nov 5, 2002
59,698
36,033
0
Texas is like a golfer that shoots a 97 at a public course, can buy a $2000 set of clubs and be OK with shooting a 156 at Augusta


Umm not really. I hate em as much as anybody but Texas is a true Blue Blood, top revenue program that has a history that can match most other programs tat recently won a News Years 6 Bowl game. Your insecure, homer view is hilarious 😂. Did a TVZ and googled Blue Blood football programs. Clicked onto LWOS Top 25 College Football Blue Bloods by Jason Rhea. Texas came in at #7 behind:
Bama
Ohio State
Oklahoma
USC
Michigan
ND.

To my surprise Pitt came in at 17th!!! I looked three times but didn‘t see WVU listed at all. I was surprised because according to some on this site WVU is a top rated program and nationally respected that has great viewership. Unfortunately for the Little8 is as soon as Texas and Oklahoma leave for SEC Little8 have no Top 25 Blue Bloods. Not to pile on but it appears no one wants any of the Little8 along for the ride.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,324
238
63
Did same TVZ google and found....

The term blue blood gets thrown out quite often in the college football world. But, what exactly is a blue blood? Simply put, a blue blood is a membership in a noble or prominent family. To belong in this college football family, the program has to meet certain criteria. Such as national championships, all-time wins, bowl appearances, All-Americans, and the number of players drafted to play at the next level. However, there are many immeasurable factors as well.

It appears 12 of those so called blue bloods haven't done **** in 20 years...That's the biggest pile of crap and explanations ever shown...

Pitt has been a nobody for 40 years. They are still living off their ancient history. Just as is UCLA, USC, Minnesota, Georgia Tech, Washington, Texas A&M, Florida, Auburn, Texas, Miami, Tennessee, Nebraska, Texas, Michigan, USC,


Pitt not even mentioned in ESPN list of so called blue bloods. They rated 26th and WVU 44th


ESPN.com Illustration

BLUE BLOODS​

T1. Alabama Crimson Tide | 10

The Tide own 11 national titles (including the most recent one). They play in the ever-competitive SEC, where they have won 25 conference titles, 12 more than the next closest team. Alabama also has more bowl wins (35) than any team in the country.

T1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish | 10

It's hard to argue with the highest all-time winning percentage in all of college football, which is the perch on which Notre Dame sits. At 892-313, the Irish have won more than 73 percent of their games. They have also won eight national championships and generated seven Heisman Trophy winners.

T1. Ohio State Buckeyes | 10

Ohio State also has seven Heisman Trophies, including the only two-time winner in running back Archie Griffin (1974, 1975). The Buckeyes have six titles to their names, half of which were won by Woody Hayes, who led the program for 28 seasons. The Buckeyes have won 35 Big Ten titles.

T1. Oklahoma Sooners | 10

The Sooners have won 72 percent of their games since taking the field in 1895, and they've won 75 percent of their conference games. With seven national titles and 14 undefeated seasons, Bob Stoops' program is a lock for blueblood status.

T1. USC Trojans | 10

The Trojans would be part of the seven-Heisman club were it not for Reggie Bush's vacated trophy. They have won seven national titles and boast 33 bowl wins, the No. 2 mark in the country behind Alabama.

6. Michigan Wolverines | 9.92

The Wolverines fall short of their fellow blue bloods in national championships with only two. But while Notre Dame has the best winning percentage, Michigan has won more games overall by a margin of 33. Current coach Jim Harbaugh will try to widen the gap.

7. Texas Longhorns | 9.83

The Longhorns have won four titles and are one of eight teams to have won 70 percent or more of their games all-time. Texas won or shared 25 conference championships during its time in the Southwest Conference but has only won three in the Big 12.

8. Nebraska Cornhuskers | 9.5

Relatively speaking, Nebraska has enjoyed more recent success. The first of the Cornhuskers five national championships came in 1970. They went back to back in 1970-71 and again in 1994-95. They've also produced three Heisman winners including 2001's winner, quarterback Eric Crouch.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,324
238
63
These so called blue list are a dime a dozen and in multiple sports media reports.

The top 10 is usually the same teams majority of the time on all list.
 

Rootmaster

New member
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
When wvu wins something then we can worry about who is considered a blue blood. Until then it's whiny fans just...whining.
 

deedoubleyou

New member
Sep 9, 2018
3,790
0
0
When wvu wins something then we can worry about who is considered a blue blood. Until then it's whiny fans just...whining.
We will never get there playing in **** like the Applebee's Chicken Strips Bowl. WVU has a history of winning, and we even won 3 BCS bowls, and have had some epic seasons, but ND kicked our asses when Harris went down, and we couldnt muster a fkn TD to save our life against a bad Pitt team to get to the NC game that year. Many people thought the Spooners were a better team than OSU that year, and we smashed OK in the Fiesta Bowl. "Almost" is our story. Seems like a long time since we've played in a big bowl game.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,324
238
63
We will never get there playing in **** like the Applebee's Chicken Strips Bowl. WVU has a history of winning, and we even won 3 BCS bowls, and have had some epic seasons, but ND kicked our asses when Harris went down, and we couldnt muster a fkn TD to save our life against a bad Pitt team to get to the NC game that year. Many people thought the Spooners were a better team than OSU that year, and we smashed OK in the Fiesta Bowl. "Almost" is our story. Seems like a long time since we've played in a big bowl game.
If football was horseshoes we would be national champs every year.