Sessions lied under oath about Russian contact.

bEER_Nation13

Freshman
Mar 1, 2012
68,102
68
0
Wow, that showed nobody!

I can sleep better at night knowing I didn't vote for Sociopath 1 or Sociopath 2 as president.

Hillary vs Trump, both unfit, unqualified sociopath narcissists.

Huggins actually cares about others. Thus, he got my vote and I can sleep easy at night with a clear conscience
 

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
I think we should have some regulation agencies. Drinking clean water is nice and having stop lights keeps things from getting messy.
Opinion: Agree with emphasis on SOME regs. Clean water is a no brainer but some compounds don't need to be regulated to what amounts to 14 bbs in the Sears Tower. Traffic lights and stop signs: we could be granted a little leeway when there's no traffic. People have different levels of comfort about such things I guess.
 

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
I can sleep better at night knowing I didn't vote for Sociopath 1 or Sociopath 2 as president.

Hillary vs Trump, both unfit, unqualified sociopath narcissists.

Huggins actually cares about others. Thus, he got my vote and I can sleep easy at night with a clear conscience
IMO, voters should choose among candidates with a chance to win. A viable 3rd party could emerge. Until it's closer, number wise, it's a wasted vote. Many people, like Mule_EER feel the way you say you do. I respect his views, but doubt your espoused feelings based on what I've read.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
I think this would be qualifying part of the question which he is able to sidestep.
And that's truly all that matters.

BTW I see this all as nonsense. Do you Senate Armed Services Committee members not speak to different ambassadors? I do have a concern that the entire cabinet seems senile. No one ever remembers what they talk about. Scary.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I think Democrats should do some soul searching. I've never seem a political party, heck, a whole ideology disintegrate so quickly. Window busting, free speech hating thugs. Bring back the kind hearted pacifists.
It's funny how the right lumps everyone on the left together, then bitches about how the left does the same. I mean, I know the right isn't all racists, sexist, xenophobic blowhards, and just because many of you are....doesn't give me the right to paint the whole political ideology as such. Right?
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
I think this would be qualifying part of the question which he is able to sidestep.
He was asked about it twice, and even went into detail on his own in the other question. Said something like: I was called a surrogate in Trumps campaign and I never spoke to anyone from Russia.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,686
1,751
113
And that's truly all that matters.

BTW I see this all as nonsense. Do you Senate Armed Services Committee members not speak to different ambassadors? I do have a concern that the entire cabinet seems senile. No one ever remembers what they talk about. Scary.
Yes, they very much do. How do you think we drum up Foreign Military Sales? Armed Services Committee's, military attaches attached to the embassy, etc.

Unless they were specifically talking about the election, there is nothing that will touch him. How they would be able to confirm he spoke about the election is another large issue.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
Yes, they very much do. How do you think we drum up Foreign Military Sales? Armed Services Committee's, military attaches attached to the embassy, etc.

Unless they were specifically talking about the election, there is nothing that will touch him. How they would be able to confirm he spoke about the election is another large issue.
They might have talked about top nuclear secrets or Keeping Up With the Kardashians. We don't know because his old *** can't remember (lol). Get a broad to take down notes FFS.
 
Dec 17, 2007
14,539
361
83
“Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?”

As carefully as you have to answer these types of questions, I can understand how answering "about the 2016 election" would elicit a response of "NO". I don't think Sessions was the best pick for AG, but because his contact with members of the Russian diplomatic delegation was in a totally different context, I can go with this answer as accurate. Just my opinion on this one.