Should America torture?

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
I actually agree with him. I think the idea is bigger and more important than the lives, truly. But I've also been willing to trade mine for this nation, so, I'm admittedly biased.

I certainly respect your opinion, but when that many lives are on the line, and you are the one making the call, I would Waterboard the **** out of that guy. I am not sure how any president could live with themselves knowing that they could have potentially saved those lives and did nothing.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Im curious if this falls into simply liberal ***** versus right wing alpha categories, or if it's mixed.
Time and time again, our military has said it was of no value and doesn't work. I believe them. Biff is simply clueless.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Would the US have lost any additional lives while waiting for the surrender?

1 American > 250,000 Japs. The Japs were absolute animals and deserved to have more bombs dropped on them.

Even with the Russian declaration of war and their battles in Manchuria and China, Truman still believed the United States would have to conquer the island. Military experts told him that it would cost 1 million American lives. The Japanese totals would've been far higher.
 

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,439
5,690
61
Even with the Russian declaration of war and their battles in Manchuria and China, Truman still believed the United States would have to conquer the island. Military experts told him that it would cost 1 million American lives. The Japanese totals would've been far higher.

Yup.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Would the US have lost any additional lives while waiting for the surrender?

1 American > 250,000 Japs. The Japs were absolute animals and deserved to have more bombs dropped on them.
I guess it depends on what your view of history is really. I agree that I wouldn't have continued island hopping or invaded Japan if there was a better way. I've been reading a lot on this since watching "The Untold History of the US" by Oliver Stone to see how accurate his assertions were in the doc. There is strong evidence that indicates Japan was ready and willing to surrender prior to the bomb (the only stipulation seems to be the retention of the Emperor- which the US agreed to anyway). I'm surely overstepping my bounds to say what would have happened, and do not mean to lessen the weight of American soldiers lives.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
Im curious if this falls into simply liberal ***** versus right wing alpha categories, or if it's mixed.
I don't think it works all that well, but I think that operators and interrogators need to have whatever tools necessary to do their job in an extreme circumstance too. I agree with you that America should strive to be the example but at the same time a soldier should be able to do what he needs to do in a given situation if need be. So I am torn.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
No to torture. Trump is an idiot
It's funny, I had no idea why this thread came about. I thought we learned already that torture is not effective. I thought EVERYBODY in this country knew this. Then it hit me, Biff....then I googled it and yes, there it is. Biff is all over it.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Even with the Russian declaration of war and their battles in Manchuria and China, Truman still believed the United States would have to conquer the island. Military experts told him that it would cost 1 million American lives. The Japanese totals would've been far higher.
Sec. of the Navy James Forrestal, Adm. Earnest King, Gen. Eisenhower, Adm. Leahy, Brig. Gen. Fellers didn't advise as such, and all felt that the bomb was unnecessary.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Time and time again, our military has said it was of no value and doesn't work. I believe them. Biff is simply clueless.

And many CIA and other intelligence officers have said very different things, including how KSM gave us critical info that lead to Bin Laden. I can post a few if you don't believe it. It is hard to imagine when time is of the essence and lives are at stake, that we sit by and only interrogate, essentially ensuring their deaths.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
It's funny, I had no idea why this thread came about. I thought we learned already that torture is not effective. I thought EVERYBODY in this country knew this. Then it hit me, Biff....then I googled it and yes, there it is. Biff is all over it.
Liberal butthurt lives forever.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Sec. of the Navy James Forrestal, Adm. Earnest King, Gen. Eisenhower, Adm. Leary, Brig. Gen. Fellers didn't advise as such, and all felt that the bomb was unnecessary.

Do you want me to list all of those that thought it was? It is a much, much longer list.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
I guess it depends on what your view of history is really. I agree that I wouldn't have continued island hopping or invaded Japan if there was a better way. I've been reading a lot on this since watching "The Untold History of the US" by Oliver Stone to see how accurate his assertions were in the doc. There is strong evidence that indicates Japan was ready and willing to surrender prior to the bomb (the only stipulation seems to be the retention of the Emperor- which the US agreed to anyway). I'm surely overstepping my bounds to say what would have happened, and do not mean to lessen the weight of American soldiers lives.

I wouldn't trust Oliver Stone to present anything in a fair and balanced fashion. He has an agenda. There is no question that some civilians in the inner circle wanted to surrender and preserve their territory as early as 1943. But the military wanted no part of that and most believed were willing to sacrifice it all to avoid surrender.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Again, I guess it depends on what history you want to believe.

That's very true. But as I posted before, it is so easy for anyone today to second guess Truman. They didn't live in his shoes. They didn't go what he went through. They didn't have all the information he had. They didn't have his responsibilities. They didn't see all those caskets coming back to the U.S. They didn't live with the thought of the hundreds of thousands of American lives lost in WWII.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
It's funny, I had no idea why this thread came about. I thought we learned already that torture is not effective. I thought EVERYBODY in this country knew this. Then it hit me, Biff....then I googled it and yes, there it is. Biff is all over it.

Yes, he signed an Exec Action today to re-open overseas CIA black sites to allow torture during interrogation.

Someone being tortured would tell tiny penis Donnie he was hung like a horse to get the torture to stop.

We have been led down many wrong paths because of this.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
That's very true. But as I posted before, it is so easy for anyone today to second guess Truman. They didn't live in his shoes. They didn't go what he went through. They didn't have all the information he had. They didn't have his responsibilities. They didn't see all those caskets coming back to the U.S. They didn't live with the thought of the hundreds of thousands of American lives lost in WWII.
I think it was more about the Russians, but you're right, it's easy to look back and second guess.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
And many CIA and other intelligence officers have said very different things, including how KSM gave us critical info that lead to Bin Laden. I can post a few if you don't believe it. It is hard to imagine when time is of the essence and lives are at stake, that we sit by and only interrogate, essentially ensuring their deaths.
Mattis is dead set against it. Biff needs to stop.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
675
0
look... Trump just gave the ULTIMATE ULTIMATUM...

if you're a good guy, this shouldn't bother you...

if you want to be a bad guy, well, enjoy the pain...

Trump's giving EVERYONE THE CHOICE to do the right thing !
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Torture? No. Absolutely not.

I have no problem with enhanced interrogation, sleep deprivation, confined space disorientation, loud music, barney marathons, light and heat disorientation. Waterboarding, I'm undecided on.
I think water boarding is torture. I think the US should not even come close to the line. War crimes were committed with extraordinary rendition.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
I think water boarding is torture. I think the US should not even come close to the line. War crimes were committed with extraordinary rendition.
I completely agree. If we want to be a world leader, we need ro act like one and take the high road on issues like this.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
It is easy to say all the right things about a topic like this and feel good that we can be better than the rest and set some example. Of course none of us are on an operation where someone who we owe our lives too is in dire straights and the only person who can give us information to save them is right in front of you and the only answers are right in that room. Are we willing as a nation to be so magnanimous that we prosecute someone for doing what they have to do to save a brother? There are two sides to this, but I agree that this stuff doesn't need to be our policy. I think looking the other way in an extreme situation is also correct.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
It is easy to say all the right things about a topic like this and feel good that we can be better than the rest and set some example. Of course none of us are on an operation where someone who we owe our lives too is in dire straights and the only person who can give us information to save them is right in front of you and the only answers are right in that room. Are we willing as a nation to be so magnanimous that we prosecute someone for doing what they have to do to save a brother? There are two sides to this, but I agree that this stuff doesn't need to be our policy. I think looking the other way in an extreme situation is also correct.
Extraordinary rendition went way beyond water boarding with no imminent threat as justification.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
Extraordinary rendition went way beyond water boarding with no imminent threat as justification.
Ok. Did you read my post though? I am not talking about extraordinary rendition. I am talking about not prosecuting someone for doing what they need to do.
 

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Extraordinary rendition went way beyond water boarding with no imminent threat as justification.
That's the problem here. We can paint all sorts of scenarios where something like waterboarding may be used as a last resort. Biff is opening with it. Some may say this is all just posturing to get the world's attention. IT IS ILLEGAL and unravels the very fabric we strived to create in world diplomacy. If anyone thinks ISIS is swayed by any of this, forget it.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
It is easy to say all the right things about a topic like this and feel good that we can be better than the rest and set some example. Of course none of us are on an operation where someone who we owe our lives too is in dire straights and the only person who can give us information to save them is right in front of you and the only answers are right in that room. Are we willing as a nation to be so magnanimous that we prosecute someone for doing what they have to do to save a brother? There are two sides to this, but I agree that this stuff doesn't need to be our policy. I think looking the other way in an extreme situation is also correct.

This issue is about CIA black site prisons, not on the battlefield.
 

WhiteTailEER

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
It is easy to say all the right things about a topic like this and feel good that we can be better than the rest and set some example. Of course none of us are on an operation where someone who we owe our lives too is in dire straights and the only person who can give us information to save them is right in front of you and the only answers are right in that room. Are we willing as a nation to be so magnanimous that we prosecute someone for doing what they have to do to save a brother? There are two sides to this, but I agree that this stuff doesn't need to be our policy. I think looking the other way in an extreme situation is also correct.

Excellent post Dave ... you've got a lot to offer when you want to
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Ok. Did you read my post though? I am not talking about extraordinary rendition. I am talking about not prosecuting someone for doing what they need to do.
Yes, I understand. I was just noting of the issues under question water boarding was the least offensive investigatory method used.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
What was the executive action that was signed yesterday? I haven't seen anything other than a draft document that is unsigned and apparently wont be signed. So far the actions by Trump so far are as follows.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/10-executive-actions-trump-signed-far/

He didn't sign it yesterday, I was wrong, but he had planned to...but it is specifically for CIA black sites.

"President Donald Trump may sign an executive order Wednesday that could allow the CIA to reopen its "black sites," or secret detention centers, reversing an order President Obama signed to shut them down in 2009, the New York Times reports.

According to a draft of the order obtained by the Times, Trump plans to rescind Obama's executive orders to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay and end CIA prisons, and replace them with an old 2007 order from George W. Bush that allowed interrogators to use tactics that were not defined by the Geneva Convention as war crimes. Trump was gearing up for self-described "big day" on national security on Wednesday, but it's not clear when he plans to sign this order."
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
He didn't sign it yesterday, I was wrong, but he had planned to...but it is specifically for CIA black sites.

"President Donald Trump may sign an executive order Wednesday that could allow the CIA to reopen its "black sites," or secret detention centers, reversing an order President Obama signed to shut them down in 2009, the New York Times reports.

According to a draft of the order obtained by the Times, Trump plans to rescind Obama's executive orders to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay and end CIA prisons, and replace them with an old 2007 order from George W. Bush that allowed interrogators to use tactics that were not defined by the Geneva Convention as war crimes. Trump was gearing up for self-described "big day" on national security on Wednesday, but it's not clear when he plans to sign this order."
So all the whining yesterday was about a draft copy of something that Trump didn't sign and wasn't even a white house document?
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,133
793
113
And I think we could've gotten a Japanese surrender without the bomb or invasion
I assume you are talking about the A Bomb. An invasion would have resulted in millions of more deaths. We might have been able to force a surrender if we continued fire bombing which also would have resulted in millions of more deaths. The decision to drop the A Bomb was the best choice.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
I assume you are talking about the A Bomb. An invasion would have resulted in millions of more deaths. We might have been able to force a surrender if we continued fire bombing which also would have resulted in millions of more deaths. The decision to drop the A Bomb was the best choice.
You may want to research that a little bit. What Japan feared was Russia declaring war on them. The day before we dropped the first atomic bomb Russia declared war on Japan. They sought terms of surrender before we dropped the atomic bombs. Also their army was so depleted 50,000 troops could've taken Tokyo.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,685
1,750
113
You may want to research that a little bit. What Japan feared was Russia declaring war on them. The day before we dropped the first atomic bomb Russia declared war on Japan. They sought terms of surrender before we dropped the atomic bombs. Also their army was so depleted 50,000 troops could've taken Tokyo.
You are only telling half of the story here. The emperor wanted to surrender, the military leadership did not. They wanted to continue to fight and have all of Japan defend itself, not just standing military. They also wanted to surrender under terms. Our leadership, specifically MacArthur would not accept anything less than unconditional surrender.