SI -Who hired Camel Toe Thamel AFTER he made up stories on Davis and Cal and then got caught up in another story full of not followed up innuendos?
The glass is twice as large as it needs to be.
I expect a loss but a win wouldn't be out of the question. Victory I see four to five, loss three to four wins. The other non ranked pre season teams are probable wins, however some more likely while others less likely.You've already predicted a USM loss....where do you see the possibility of 4 or 5?
From USM site" I expect a high scoring game that UK eventually loses. However a UK win wouldn't surprise me." Dakota25
I expect a loss but a win wouldn't be out of the question. Victory I see four to five, loss three to four wins. The other non ranked pre season teams are probable wins, however some more likely while others less likely.
If UK beats USM I can see UK getting to four or five wins this year. If UK loses to USM I can see as low as three but four tops.What??? Maybe I need a beer or two but have no clue what you just said?
Got itIf UK beats USM I can see UK getting to four or five wins this year. If UK loses to USM I can see as low as three but four tops.
If UK beats USM I can see UK getting to four or five wins this year. If UK loses to USM I can see as low as three but four tops.
The writer elicited the responses he needs to draw attention and save his job. After all, comments like this is for ratings and viewership. That is what passes for journalism today.
Our football team will be just fine this year. All the negativity and loser attitude is certainly justified after six decades of inexcusable football. It's tough and nearly all out difficult to change fan culture.
It's our time to win this year with depth, talent and coaching. The future will be even better.
Don't think this had been posted earlier, if so apologies for the duplication
http://www.si.com/college-football/2016/08/18/sec-preview-picks-hot-seat-2016
You can tell this writer really did his homework when basically says there is nothing to be excited about other than Boom.
And then drags out the cliché...."were all just sitting around anyway, waiting for basketball season".
Could 3-9 happen....sure, injuries and depth can make most any teams season go completely awry.
But even with our apparent weaknesses, this would be the absolute minimum of what we could hope for this year.
I agree about 3-9 not happening.If this prediction turns out to be true, we are in trouble for a lot of years to come. A 3-9 season would likely kill recruiting next year, and the whole coaching staff would be in trouble. Many of our commitments would jump ship and, well, when is basketball season? But this is not going to be a 3-9 season. We'll know more after the first couple games.
Indeed. I can only imagine the calls Stoops would be getting on his radio show.3-9 would be a disaster for the program. Hopefully, the record will be much better....
Auburn surprised me last yeat. USC not so much. I had them winning 4 at the beginning of the year so they were just one game under what I thought.I don't see UK going 3-9 this year, not even close to that really. But anything can happen on the field, if not there would be not reason to play the games, just announce Bama SEC champ and be done with it. I didn't see and I doubt anyone else say USC and SOS going 3-9 last season either, or AU going 4-8 2 years after winning the NC.
But to the poster who said UK would beat USM without trying, not sure UK has improved enough to do that. all these guys on every team are great athletes.
1)given Stoops contract guarantees he will not be fired in 2016. Flat out, no. would cost UK scratching a check for $12 cash. even SI's 3-9 comes true he will be coaching in 2017.Here's my question: Would it be better to go 5-7 and limp along with the Mitch and Stoops show, or go 3-9 or even 2-10 and force a reset of a regime that has failed to deliver on football for 15 years now.
If he did, he also saw us last year, and we had close games with all 3 of those teams....there is very little difference between those programs and ours. Look, I think it's a silly prediction, but we have shown NOTHING that says we are so much better than all of these teams on our schedule. Look, when you have to go to OT to beat EKU, win 4 of your 5 games by a score or less, people will be skeptical. We have 2 games on our schedule that are pretty much locks. Other than that, we have shown nothing since Stoops took over that should give outsiders a reason to predict all of these wins. LIke I said, I don't think we only win 3, but for someone to predict that is not so outlandish.That article is a joke and so is the writer. This guy thinks we won't win a single SEC game I assume? Did he see Vandy, USC and Mizzou last year?
I will believe it when I see it. Since the last time we won 8 regular season games, we have won 1, 2 or 3 regular season games in 7 different seasons. I know I am being pessimistic in this thread, but Stoops has proven nothing to me yet. This is the year he HAS to take the next step and I think he gets us to 6 wins.easier to justify us winning 8 than to do so for us losing 9
Predicting 3-9 is just idiotic.
This writer should resign or be fired for lack of intelligence or applicable knowledge of the topic.
Either way, he dropped the ball.