Sidney and Moultrie starting today vs North Texas
- Thread starter JacksonDevilDog
- Start date
It's a selective suspension, (when is to be determined by the coach), but it's still a suspension.
There is a major coverup underway on this deal (of Watergate proportions).
We are just trying to keep it on the QT.
That is all.
There is a major coverup underway on this deal (of Watergate proportions).
We are just trying to keep it on the QT.
That is all.
Watergate was wrong on every level. It has to do with the government's relationship with the people.
This is not wrong on ANY level. It is an excellent move made to help our team, which is what our coach is paid to do.
Are you seriously comparing this to Watergate?
Beyond Ridiculous.
This is not wrong on ANY level. It is an excellent move made to help our team, which is what our coach is paid to do.
Are you seriously comparing this to Watergate?
Beyond Ridiculous.
When you say you have sources and you become an arrogant prick when posting about "inside information"... every 17ing detail better be correct.
Your sources were full of ****. They pulled the number 3 out of thin air apparently. If you had just said that Stansbury was selectively suspending Sidney and Moultrie and blaming it own injuries, no one would be calling you out.
You specifically and adamantly stated that it was a 3 game suspension and that they'd be back next week. You were wrong and now you're being served your crow. Eat up.
Your sources were full of ****. They pulled the number 3 out of thin air apparently. If you had just said that Stansbury was selectively suspending Sidney and Moultrie and blaming it own injuries, no one would be calling you out.
You specifically and adamantly stated that it was a 3 game suspension and that they'd be back next week. You were wrong and now you're being served your crow. Eat up.
I am more interested in the fact that our nationally ranked basketball team has won 6 in a row and we are off to our best start in years. This board sometimes reminds me of the guy that can look at Erin Andrews and complain about that freckle on her left butt cheek.
Two starters off of one of the best lineups are back after a "suspension" or injuries or whatever the 17 happened and we can't talk about it? Really?
This is an MSU sports board. You want to talk about the game, start a thread. You won't be hard pressed to find participants.</p>
This is an MSU sports board. You want to talk about the game, start a thread. You won't be hard pressed to find participants.</p>
Ok, so the Watergate is an exaggeration.
I'm more referring to a ******** thread along this line a couple of days ago.
I'm more referring to a ******** thread along this line a couple of days ago.
You gave a bogus claim with no info to back it up, then when it turns out you are wrong, you make excuses for your story.
Sidney was suspended for three games of Stansbury's choosing for violating team rules. Remember back to the South Alabama game when Sidney had a groin. There's suspension #3.
Now on Moultrie, I have no clue.
Now on Moultrie, I have no clue.
who doesn't care what anyone thinks! Just want to fit you in the appropriate internet tough guy box.
Seriously, just admit you were full of **** and move on.
Seriously, just admit you were full of **** and move on.
Comparison. Although Stans, much like Nixon in 72, has nothing to fear from the opposition, he had Sidney break into Kennedys office to steal some of his planned plays for the upcoming season. One of the walk ons (she didn't know the name, described him as a short slow white guy) was supposed to help, but there was confusion and Arnett went by accident. Police caught them and admin hit em with quick suspensions in an effort to sweep it under the rug.
At least that's what I think she said. It was kinda hard to understand what she was saying....
At least that's what I think she said. It was kinda hard to understand what she was saying....
under the covers.
Personally, I don't mind when somebody talks with her mouth full, as long as she doesn't expect me to understand what she's saying. In any event, we have another clear case of style over substance. I move that the case be closed.
Personally, I don't mind when somebody talks with her mouth full, as long as she doesn't expect me to understand what she's saying. In any event, we have another clear case of style over substance. I move that the case be closed.