Sidney gets 2 ticky tack fouls and now they are letting them mug each other.

maroonmania

Senior
Feb 23, 2008
11,053
700
113
that's become more than obvious at this point. Tonight, the first foul was valid but the second foul he got was just 2 guys in their battling. Only Sidney would have gotten called on that one.
 

RocketCityDawg

Redshirt
Nov 11, 2007
1,660
0
36
From the games I've seen, it does seem that Sid has a target on his back for them.
Not that I know anything.
 

dawgbydesign

Redshirt
Oct 25, 2009
172
0
0
There are certain fouls ref call every time. Like putting your hand on the five's back instead of your forearm. Looks the same in the end but the hand is a foul and not the forearm.<div>
</div><div>The "muggers" are using proper body position and defensive fundamentals, therefore no foul.</div><div>
</div><div>Sidney's fouls are due to laziness and lack of basic understanding on the defensive end. DVR doesn't lie.</div>
 

dawgbydesign

Redshirt
Oct 25, 2009
172
0
0
The second foul was legit. If Sidney would have moved his feet one half step over the foul would not have been called. Instead of moving his feet he manipulates with his body and reaches. Most people call this phenomenon the inability of a coaching staff to teach and expect fundamentals.