knew about the whole deal. I wanted to vomit all over my TV yesterday watching them play. The announcers never came out and said it, but the overall tone to that entire broadcast was sympathetic to Cam. let's loo at these "allegations" one by one:
1) Bond claims Rogers "contacted" him about paying for Cam.... this turned out to be true, Rogers confirmed it.
2) Asst Coaches said Cecil claimed it would "take more than a scholarship"... this turned out to be true, Cecil himself basically confirmed this.
3) MSU claims it contacted the SEC in January about this...true, confirmed
4) Asst Coach claims said the "money was too much at AU"...this one is pending...so why would someone assume that Cam didn't know about it after EVERYTHING anyone on our side has sai has been proven true? why would we insert a random lie, while being 100% truthful and
correct in everything else?
Somehow no one in the media wants to simply compare the truthfullness of the two sides
1) Bond claims Rogers "contacted" him about paying for Cam.... this turned out to be true, Rogers confirmed it.
2) Asst Coaches said Cecil claimed it would "take more than a scholarship"... this turned out to be true, Cecil himself basically confirmed this.
3) MSU claims it contacted the SEC in January about this...true, confirmed
4) Asst Coach claims said the "money was too much at AU"...this one is pending...so why would someone assume that Cam didn't know about it after EVERYTHING anyone on our side has sai has been proven true? why would we insert a random lie, while being 100% truthful and
correct in everything else?
Somehow no one in the media wants to simply compare the truthfullness of the two sides