Since when can a review

[uptowndawg]

Result in a penalty? I thought the only time this could happen was on a targeting call, and not an intentional grounding that was never flagged live.

 

[anon1787432961]

Almost certain that's correct

 

[paindonthurt_]

I’m pretty sure they threw the flag and then waved it when they thought he was down.

 

[Uncle Ruckus]

I don’t think so, but that’s not the point.
What happened would be like a coach challenging a spot call, the ref saying that the player actually did get the spot, but he found someone holding on tape so there’s a 10yd penalty. Since when is any of that possible?

 

[paindonthurt_]

He challenged whether he was down.

He wasn’t down.

Therefore it was intentional grounding.

IMO, it wasn’t intentional grounding but it played out correctly if they thought it was intentional grounding.

 

[IBleedMaroonDawg]

When you are making **** up on the fly.

 

[uptowndawg]

He challenged whether he was down.

He wasn’t down.

Therefore it was intentional grounding.

IMO, it wasn’t intentional grounding but it played out correctly if they thought it was intentional grounding.

This makes sense.