Mmmmmm
And again, don’t bet the farm; so sayeth my projection.
Fortunately, we know the lack of that worth.
Mmmmmm
And again, don’t bet the farm; so sayeth my projection.
Poor Sheila; still a groupie.Fortunately, we know the lack of that worth.
Poor Sheila; still a groupie.
Didn’t you get a new dollhouse for Xmas? Something a little more your speed? Thought so; run along and play now.
I am more interested in who the hell is going to block next year. I pray this is Briles seeing the tape and looking young men in the whites of the eyes and saying we do not have a spot for you next year. WE need six bulls. Miami's right guard is an absolute beast. He is down field on every play looking for someone to spear. Pile driver we haven't had since Latimore was running the ball.
Everything is conditional. If the offensive line turns out to be an unsuccessful project, both the premise and the projection will be validated. If not, it wasn't my premise to begin with.Mmmmmm
Ah. Well, the projection is based on a premise put forth by a poster using a hackneyed cliche who thinks he wants what you project. And again, don’t bet the farm; so sayeth my projection.
Dang, he is one I wanted to stay.Thompson enters portal. Make that 7
Speaking for myself, I am more optimistic about the 2026 as we finally have a proper offensive line coach/staff, I believe we are going to be much improved. I don't have any concerns with all of these ol players leaving, we need to start fresh, onwards and upwards, go gamecocks!
New sheriff in town?Well, the new coaches have seen the film, and they feel they are better off bringing their own OL.
Did he owe you some money?Dang, he is one I wanted to stay.
Yeah, changing the head coach has really worked out for us in the past, every 4 or 5 years we’ve done that and look at where we’re at, time to try something new and keep our coach longer than that, as far as the o line goes, good riddance, Teasley could recruit but obviously can’t coach, start fresh and hopefully get a lot better, can’t imagine who we could get as head coach that would make a difference, in today’s college football world if we got a new coach he would more than likely move on for more money if he turned us around, Beamer wants to be here for the long haul it seems so let’s give him more time to hopefully get us straightened out. Our past changing coaches hasn’t worked out really well.In other words, next year will be Beamer's last.
Yeah, changing the head coach has really worked out for us in the past, every 4 or 5 years we’ve done that and look at where we’re at, time to try something new and keep our coach longer than that, as far as the o line goes, good riddance, Teasley could recruit but obviously can’t coach, start fresh and hopefully get a lot better, can’t imagine who we could get as head coach that would make a difference, in today’s college football world if we got a new coach he would more than likely move on for more money if he turned us around, Beamer wants to be here for the long haul it seems so let’s give him more time to hopefully get us straightened out. Our past changing coaches hasn’t worked out really well.
No I was interested to see him as a Junior, started as a Fresh and Soph and then leaves, if we had gotten a upgrade at LT from the portal he could of shifted to RTDid he owe you some money?
I think his point is that it’s apparently not a recipe for success either.Changing a coach every 5 years is actually longer than the average tenure for college coaches. It’s not the revolving door some think it is.
Actually, I don't care one way or the other. But if the line blows next year, he's gone.Yeah, changing the head coach has really worked out for us in the past, every 4 or 5 years we’ve done that and look at where we’re at, time to try something new and keep our coach longer than that, as far as the o line goes, good riddance, Teasley could recruit but obviously can’t coach, start fresh and hopefully get a lot better, can’t imagine who we could get as head coach that would make a difference, in today’s college football world if we got a new coach he would more than likely move on for more money if he turned us around, Beamer wants to be here for the long haul it seems so let’s give him more time to hopefully get us straightened out. Our past changing coaches hasn’t worked out really well.
I think his point is that it’s apparently not a recipe for success either.
How would we know?The usual response to that is to ask if keeping an underachieving coach is a recipe for success either.
How would we know?
absolutely, after watching this putrid ol for the last 3 seasons I am ready to see what our new ol staff can do. Thankfully we finally have a proper offensive staff to compliment our defense, excited to see what 2026 brings for us, go gamecocks!Well, the new coaches have seen the film, and they feel they are better off bringing their own OL.
with regards to the large number of OL players leaving, I for one am glad to see this transition. I wish these young guys well wherever they land, but I trust our new offensive staff to make these decisions moving forward, go gamecocks.Changing a coach every 5 years is actually longer than the average tenure for college coaches. Its not the revolving door some think it is.
As for the OL. I can understand the good riddance attitude, but there's an issue if numbers. We are losing a lot. We need to not only replace them, but replace them with better players, across first and second string and don't all in one offseason.
I would like to have seen what the new coaching could do with some of these guys before having to rebuild feom scratch.
with regards to the large number of OL players leaving, I for one am glad to see this transition. I wish these young guys well wherever they land, but I trust our new offensive staff to make these decisions moving forward, go gamecocks.
It's hilarious that any of our OLinemen had the audacity to ask for *any* money!Shurburtt reporting Thompson wanted more money than we were willing to pay.
It's hilarious that any of our OLinemen had the audacity to ask for *any* money!![]()
It's common knowledge that it takes the OL unit longer to gel than other units on the team, a realistic expectation is about 1 1/2 -2 year time frame.Changing a coach every 5 years is actually longer than the average tenure for college coaches. Its not the revolving door some think it is.
As for the OL. I can understand the good riddance attitude, but there's an issue if numbers. We are losing a lot. We need to not only replace them, but replace them with better players, across first and second string and don't all in one offseason.
I would like to have seen what the new coaching could do with some of these guys before having to rebuild feom scratch.
Agree. That's why the number of departures is a bit concerning. I'm staying positive about it but I'm not going to assume all is great either "because they all suck and need to get lost". Hopefully a new staff, better coaching and better players will be the end product.It's common knowledge that it takes the OL unit longer to gel than other units on the team, a realistic expectation is about 1 1/2 -2 year time frame.
With the prospect of replacing what looks to be starters and backups, it would be a bit unrealistic to expect massive improvement as early as this fall, regardless of the pedigree of the new staff.
Teams "plug'n'play" OL all the time due to injuries/other. IMO, the "gel" factor is overrated.It's common knowledge that it takes the OL unit longer to gel ....
Hell, he's played WR for THREE years. I sure hope he has improved some.He was a d end in HS. If you can’t see his improvement then u r blind. Stopping track helps him tremendously.
And other than Henry, which o lineman will we miss? Stanley at center would snap every other ball low/high/right/left. Appreciate his effort but each play started behind the 8 ball. Babalade jumps offsides 3 times a game. Then pushes on blocks with minimal effort. Sorry, and I thank him for signing with us, but we could get a lineman from App State more effective.
Of course they do, and the rotational players are participating in drills along with the 1st string in every single practices/meetings. This is to keep up the playing level and avoid drop offs.Teams "plug'n'play" OL all the time due to injuries/other. IMO, the "gel" factor is overrated.
It would seem our coaches are not that concerned.
He does….he’s had 3 years worth of “talent”….so let him go and wish him well.Heard on the radio that Bogulatie sp? is now the highest paid OL. Someone thinks he has talent
Anyone who thinks OL are "plug and play" doesn't know much at all about football. If that were true, there would be little to no drop off when a starter went down and the backup who practices with the 1s every day came in. OL is very much a "team" unit. Every player on the OL needs to know and trust every other player and know instinctively how to work together. There is no other position group on a team that requires as much cohesion as the OL.Of course they do, and the rotational players are participating in drills along with the 1st string in every single practices/meetings. This is to keep up the playing level and avoid drop offs.
The "gel" factor as stated by very prominent coaches (through the years) is not considered overrated, but essential.
If our offense/OL coaches are not that concerned, then one has to question their commitment and or professionalism