Slow day poll - Would you rather, as a state fan.....

[bonedaddy401]

You have to pick one or the other.....

 

[natchezdawg]

"What did you enjoy the most, asa State fan....." </p>

 

[UpTheMiddlex3Punt]

At least in recent memory. We had some fairly uncompetitive football seasons in the mid 90s.

 

[bonedaddy401]

Jackie kept us competitive

 

[Optimus Prime 4]

[No message]

 

[jcdawgman18]

This decade has had some very, very painful years for football.</p>

 

[FlabLoser]

[No message]

 

[JimC1097]

Remember Crooms said the roster was decimated after Jackie..... I don't consider our Liberty Bowl miracle a rebuild completion.

 

[patdog]

The Crxxm era wasn't a rebuilding project, it was a complete waste of time and money. Just because we sucked when Crxxm was here doesn't mean we were rebuilding.

 

[bonedaddy401]

/

 

[patdog]

We weren't even trying for 5 years. 6 really, as I count the last year of the Sherrill era too.

 

[Coach34]

.

 

[TaleofTwoDogs]

Both choices are the lesser of two evils. I know its just a slow day poll, but damn I'm so tired of mediocrity that even this poll pisses me off. No offense to you BD. .

 

[bonedaddy401]

because both of those stretches at some point include the best times we have ever seen in football and basketball. That is a cold, hard fact.

 

[TaleofTwoDogs]

to the upper tier programs. We are a charter member of the SEC and in 80+ years of SEC competition this is the best string of years we can do (no offense '41). That's what I find sad and disappointing. If 40 years of watching State is a first generation fan, I guess I'm one.