Slow motion coup
- Thread starter rog1187
- Start date
It was a pretty good quote.
Imagine if Hillary had won. Think there would be "investigations" about Trump and his campaign's election with Putin?
Do liberals remember Hillarys lecture from the debate about how harmful it was to not accept the results of an election. Sadly they all thought her words were for Trumo so they didnt pay attention.
1. Who cares?
2. The election is over......
3. Get over it.......
Those are three points that you all continue to put out there to anyone who doesn't agree with Trump and you lump in as a "Hillary voter".
You are literally the only person on this board I see make those statements outside of poking fun at the snowflakes
Do you think if Hillary won, the GOP controlled Congress would be investigating her for the umpteenth time? The fact is, the GOP controls everything in govt. And this **** is still going down. Obviously its the Deep State working with the Illuminati with help from the Tri-lateral Commission with additional support from the Masons.
No doubt they would be. But you wouldn't have the bulk of the media adding in their efforts.
Speculative and probably incorrect. The media was in a tizzy for months over Whitewater, Travelgate, Billinggate and Monica gate. When the Prez is under investigation, reporters tend to want to write about it.
While this true, I think times have changed especially with media coverage and bias.
I don't think there would be a special prosecutor with such wide range of power. The investigation would be left to the FBI, House, and Senate.
Find evidence that we still would have investigated Russia meddling in our 2016 election if Hildabeast won? OK. I'll be right back.
Why do you think this investigation has morphed into a criminal investigation fro a counter-inel investigation? Speculation on the FBI's part? I'm may be completely off base with this wild assumption but I'd imagine that those investigating all this won't be sharing evidence until they indict somebody.
So you're now saying there's no evidence after saying flatly I'm wrong. How do you know I'm wrong since there is no evidence?
You're wildly off base since inside info has been streaming to the media like water through a sieve. So far what has been alleged as wrongdoing isn't even illegal.
lol. So now you are starting sentences with the word so. I haven't had a chance to cross back over in to the alternate timeline to get your evidence.
Are you saying there is not a grand jury in NoVa subpoenaing Flynn's business records?
I was talking about NoVa, not NY or whatever nonsense that British hag is spewing.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...igures-russia-probe-mueller-will-lead-n761256
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/politics/grand-jury-fbi-russia/
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-flynn-targeted-by-grand-jury-subpoenas-sources-confirm/
Of course Im sure those links are all FAKE NEWS to you.
Nah, those don't surprise me. Money laundering and related, they're probably both gonna see bars.
You have to keep in mind to whom the witch-hunt media is feeding this crap. The low IQ crowd and they think that if Trump pissed in the wrong urinal....It's impeachable.
I never said the left was stupid. I have many lefty friends and none are stupid. The low IQ folks are the ones that hinge on every negative media Trump report. I'm sure there are just as many low IQ nuts on the right.
I believe he was talking about Trump. I understand you all like to lump everything together all of the sudden, so it's understandable why you keep confusing the two.