So Ben carson tried to stab a guy once....
- Thread starter RichardPeterJohnson
- Start date
At least he did not succeed. Hillary did succeed at total incompetence resulting in four deaths in Benghazi. No additional security needed. Over 600 requests and she claims she did not know anything. Completely incompetent if true.
Because habitual liar always paranoid of the vast right wing conspiracy just isn't good enough.
SOOOOO ? .....his story is real life. You better stick to your fantasy world.
Wait a minute....Benghazi is Hillary's fault......9/11 isn't Bush's fault, but it's Bill Clinton's fault......hmmm......seeing a trend here by you.......
WTF is wrong with you? Who replies "SOOOOO?" to someone wanting to hit their own mother in the head with a hammer? That is messed up.
Let me give you a few facts. The Brits pulled out of Benghazi. The Red Cross pulled out. There were prior attacks. Over 600 requests for increased security were made, with zero being approved. And Hillary doesn't know a thing. As I said, she is either lying or incompetent.
Here are some details:
U.S. security for diplomats in Libya was steadily drawn down in 2012 prior to the September 11 terrorist attacks, amid reports of hundreds of security incidents and despite repeated requests for better security from State Department officials in the country. Below are 8 major warning signs.
2011: Ambassador premonition: “…Things could go wrong.”
In 2011, al-Qaeda was known to be in Tripoli to exploit Libya’s unsettled status and to try to obtain some of the thousands of missing MANPADS (man portable air-defense systems): shoulder-fired missiles seized by rebel forces that stormed Qaddafi government bases. U.S. Ambassador Cretz realized there were seriously dangerous tensions among anti-Qaddafi factions: Islamists and secularists. “I think there is a genuine cause to be concerned that things could go wrong,” he told reporters.
Dec. 2011: “Islamic terrorist elements…gaining operational capability.”
Operation Papa Noel, a major terrorist plot targeting foreign diplomatic missions in Libya, was thwarted in December of 2011. Pro-Qaddafi elements had planned to launch a sophisticated attack on foreign diplomatic missions and oil fields in Libya. Later, the written emergency-evacuation plan for the U.S. mission in Benghazi warned, “the majority of Loyalist insurgents tasked with carrying out this plan are still active and free in Benghazi” and “Islamic terrorist elements do exist in this area of the country, and have been reported by open sources to be gaining operational capability.”
2012: In an online posting, al-Qaeda stated its intent to attack the Red Cross, the British, and then the Americans in Benghazi. The goals were accomplished in order.
April 10, 2012: An explosive device is thrown at a convoy traveling in Benghazi carrying United Nations envoy Ian Martin.
May 22, 2012: A rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) hits the Benghazi offices of the International Red Cross and the agency decides to pull out.
June 6, 2012: An improvised explosive device detonated just outside the Benghazi consulate compound.
June 11, 2012: A rocket-propelled grenade hit a convoy carrying the British ambassador in Benghazi. The U.K. pulled out of Benghazi.
2012: There was an al-Qaeda demonstration right smack in the middle of Benghazi. “They had a parade down the streets. They raised their flag on one of the county buildings,” says one observer.
“We had no actionable intelligence . . . about this threat in Benghazi,” State Dept. Patrick Kennedy later testified to Congress. “And therefore . . . I never went to the secretary of state and told her it was time to leave Benghazi.”
More in “Stonewalled.”
Ok, still dodged what I was intending to say. Did I say Hillary wasn't to blame? But you didn't come out and say Bush was to blame for 9/11. Thus, my theory is right. If it happens under a Democrat's reign, it's their fault. If it happens under the Republican's, then it's still the previous Democrat's fault.
YOU are what's wrong with American politics!
Bush was not to blame as the Joint Select Committee found that while we had warmings, there was no actionable intelligence. On the other hand, our Benghazi facility was previously attacked. There were specific warnings. The Brits and Red Cross left. We received 600 requests for increased security. If you can't see the obvious differences, then I can't help you.
LOL...That's pretty funny. Let me try that.....3...2....1..BENGHAZI!. Hey look, they're all drooling again. This is fun.
You may want to tell that to the faces of those that lost loved ones, but my guess is that your not nearly brave enough.
Funny. In that whole un-attributed, plagarized essay, there is not one mention of the CIA. You do know that this whole Benghazi fiasco was a CIA operation, right? Is it the Sec of State's responsibility to provide the CIA with security. The wingnuts on that committee that just got their asses handed to them didn't seem too interested in the CIA's involvement in this whole deal either. Wonder why? Could it have something to do with Petraeus being in charge of the CIA? You morons live in a black and white world. For sure.
You are very, very ill informed. Stevens and Smith were killed at the American Diplomatic Compound. The CIA annex, which was a mile away, is where Woods and Doherty were killed.
And yes, it was Clinton's job to provide security for our Diplomatic Compound. Are all anti-semites as stupid as you?
Ok, you are officially entered IDIOT phase. Ummm...1993 ring a bell? World Trade Center???? HELLO!?!?!?! I believe that qualifies as "previously attacked", added to the fact that a security memo to the president stated in August 2001 that an attack was imminent, and suggested planes being used in to buildings. Duh!
You are simply one stupid anti-semite. Of course the CIA was there, everyone knows that. That does not nor did not relieve the burden Clinton bore in securing our diplomatic outpost. She even said she took responsibility (but then of course denied knowing anything).
Let me explain very, very slowly. We had zero warnings that there was going to be an attack on the World Trade Centers or on the Pentagon. Let me type this slowly. We had zero warnings of an attack on those two facilities. We had vague intelligence warnings that Al Qaeda wanted to attack us but with no specific timeframe identified.
The Benghazi outpost was previously attacked. We were warned by the Brits of another attack that was to come. Hillary's guy dismissed over 600 requests for additional security at that compound.
Changing the subject I see. Nice try. What does the CIA have to do with the fact that our Diplomatic Compound was unsecured? If the CIA were running guns (as I am sure they were), wouldn't it be even more important for Clinton to provided additional security for her Compound?
Does Muslims taking flying lessons in Florida with no regard for how to land them count?
You're right, GeeDub probably didn't have the exact date and time of the attack.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0
So basically, there were about 10 times as many CIA people on the ground as State Dept. The kooks playing politics with all this want to turn over every stone the State dept touched but have no interest in what the CIA was doing, who was providing their security, how much involvement the Pentagon had in security (already)...should i go on? It is intellectually dishonest for these wingnuts to claim that they want the truth yet not bother to interview any of the players of the other agencies involved-agencies that also lost personnel. You have no problem with that? I'm sure Clinton made mistakes. She's admitted as much. But to blatantly ignore the others is disingenuous. But of course, we know his whole probe has been about politics from day 1. Good luck with your next hearing on this. :flush:Owned.
You're a Dem apologist. Four men died because of Hillary's incompetence. Over 600 requests for additional security, all denied. The State Department and the CIA are always together in foreign locations. If Clinton knew what the CIA was up to, she should have spent a great deal more time talking with Stevens and approving additional security. Stevens did not even have her email address (unlike Blumenthal) and she did not talk with Stevens at any time after he was approved as Ambassador. Your argument makes Hillary's actions even more abhorrent.
Ah Ha! Stevens didn't have her email address, cell phone, home address and had never even visited her home (like Blumenthal). I saw that part of the hearing and and was almost as funny as the chick asking Hillary if she was home "the whole night". Ergo, she is guilty of whatever you wingnuts think she is.
Over 600 requests. You can't make this stuff up. She knows what the CIA is doing and she never talks with Stevens. As I said, either lying or gross incompetence. But we all know she clearly lied to the American people and to the victims families by blaming a video all to help save Obama's reelection.
[roll]Now we know that the only reason Obama beat Mitt (in an electoral landslide) was Hillary's conspiracy to not call this terrorism (which Obama did on sept 12). keep em coming, Einstein. PS You may have a future on Gowdy's committee! [pfftt]
Last edited:
We don't the exact circumstances when the thought was in his mind. We don't know all the stress and pressure he was experiencing at the time. Can you honestly say you have NEVER had any SICK thoughts at any time in your life? The important thing is that he never acted on the thought. What kind of sick things are on your mind when you are watching some of the fantasy crap you watch?
I know its hard for you to accept, but she LIED. Over and over again. And directly to the faces of the families at Andrews Air Force base when the bodies were recovered.
He did act on his thoughts. By his own admission, he stabbed a guy but the knife hit the guy's belt buckle and saved him. So, there's that.....
I'm glad that I can now save myself time by getting the Fox News and Limbaugh narratives here from you. Over the next 8 years, you and your kook friends and can hold hearing after hearing on this and see if you can impeach President Hillary. Good luck with that!
Wrong thought. The thought in question was hitting his mother with a hammer. Keep in mind that Carson's early life experiences were most likely far different than yours and mine. In your mind, how much time in purgatory should he serve?
Well he is a Republican front runner, so basically forever. A member of the Klan? **** it! He atoned.