You gotta give Torbush another year or two and let him prove it was the talent and not his coaching, because somewhere in the middle of the season he said you can only teach inexperienced players so much alluding to the lack of talent.
I do think his scheme will work better with strength on the front line. Maybe we ran a lot of 3 front because of lack of depth there. But next year we still have McPhee, Cox, Ferguson and probably some others I'm not thinking of returning with experience. Then you have Kaleb Eulls and James Carmon coming in. Maybe we see alot more 4 front that's going to provide the pressure that lets a zone type defense like Torbush's work.
I just saw some obvious flaws in the coaching still, things he CAN teach the players to be better defenders even the inexperienced ones. One is none of our DBs ever tried to use their 5 yards to jam the WRs. That makes a huge difference in play development. Another is when our players are defending the long pass, they play the receiver only and not the ball, and we got burned many more times than we had to for that reason alone. Lastly, it is widely known that you play man to man against the spread, and we played against the spread for most of our schedule, yet we played zone all the time. There may be a good reason for that, inexperienced players may very well be the reason. But at some point the experience in coaching has to show up as well. We can't ask Mullen and Koenning to match these high powered offenses TD for TD. I mean Mullen is a good offensive coach, but the defense has to do its part at some point, Mullen is not a miracle worker. No more getting beat on the run like Auburn, beat on the pass by Arkansas and Houston, and being totally dominated by Bama...no more. We are in the SEC and need to start playing SEC defense.