ended regulation with 4 TO's and began the OT with FIVE. What good did that do? 27 ticks left in reg and we do not use a TO. Why not? 8 seconds left in OT and we get ball and no TO. Why not? We just throw it up at the end of both periods.<div>
</div><div>On top of that bs, we play man the entire game and GA ran us to death; we fought screen after screen and were exhausted....still we save the TO's. Why? GA had more energy. What does that mean?</div><div>
</div><div>As for individual performances, Moultrie was in a total funk. Steele was ok but wasn't smart on that last foul. Sid played well but as usual got gassed...back to the time out issue. Hood, I think, is worn down. Bryant should have gotten more minutes. Bost was Bost. Teamwise....no block outs which resulted in probably 20 offensive rebounds for them. Despite all that, IF our coach had done what he should have done we would have won the game. Sick.</div>
</div><div>On top of that bs, we play man the entire game and GA ran us to death; we fought screen after screen and were exhausted....still we save the TO's. Why? GA had more energy. What does that mean?</div><div>
</div><div>As for individual performances, Moultrie was in a total funk. Steele was ok but wasn't smart on that last foul. Sid played well but as usual got gassed...back to the time out issue. Hood, I think, is worn down. Bryant should have gotten more minutes. Bost was Bost. Teamwise....no block outs which resulted in probably 20 offensive rebounds for them. Despite all that, IF our coach had done what he should have done we would have won the game. Sick.</div>