Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Ohio State vs. Dave Portnoy will get Fox the attention it craves
On3:
Texas vs. Ohio State: More than a marquee opener, it's becoming a special interconference rivalry
On3:
Top 10 games to watch Week 1 of college football season
On3:
Transfer portal impact players of Week 0
Ohio State:
CJ Stroud sets expectations for Julian Sayin as Ohio State starting quarterback
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
So much for that "non D1 qb". 532 yards passing 5td's 2int's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HurdyGurdyEer" data-source="post: 129475456" data-attributes="member: 1746848"><p>You want me to kick Huggs? OK. I will.</p><p></p><p>If his program starts looking a circus again, with him doing the drunken stumble in the center ring, the howling will be resurrected. That good enough for you? And, as I have said many times, If Huggs maintains a relatively stable program and his team is competitive on the court you won't hear the howling. But Huggs got nothing to do with this. </p><p></p><p>In my opinion, on THAT night against THAT team in THAT game a more accurate QB could have made a serious run at 700 yards passing. And I base that on numerous inaccurate passes that could have easily accounted for another 100-150 yards or more. </p><p></p><p>There were 23 incomplete passes in that game. If that number is reduced to say, 15, meaning another 8 completions, and considering that he completed 28 passes for 532 yards at 19 yards a completion, if you multiple an additional 8 completions by 19 yards you get an extra 152 yards. 532 + 152 = 684 yards. (BTW completing 36 of 51 passes would have been a completion percentage of 70%. </p><p></p><p>You telling me that no one has every completed 70% of their passes in a game? Look at <a href="http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/leaders/pass-cmp-pct-player-career.html">THIS </a>and see that a number of college quarterbacks had CAREER completion percentages right around 70%. Look at the Top Ten on that list and see how many of those guys some guy named Dana Holgorsen coached.</p><p></p><p>I understand that you disagree with me. And that's OK. But quit making yourself look silly. 50 Division 1 quarterbacks finished THE SEASON with higher QB ratings than Howard had in that bowl game. The better passers at the upper end of the QB rating scale could have made a serious run at 700 yards in THAT game on THAT night. And those 70% career completion guys could have made a run at 700 on THAT night too.</p><p></p><p>I'm glad that we won and that Sky had a big game. But let's not act like it was an amazing performance. It wasn't. But it was good.</p><p></p><p>And now.... I'm out. </p><p></p><p>You may now console yourself with more name calling and raising issues that have nothing to do with the Cactus Bowl and the ability of superior college football quarterbacks.</p><p></p><p>One more thing .... go ahead and lecture me again about my knowledge and I promise to not respond and let you have the last word.</p><p></p><p>See how nice I can be?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HurdyGurdyEer, post: 129475456, member: 1746848"] You want me to kick Huggs? OK. I will. If his program starts looking a circus again, with him doing the drunken stumble in the center ring, the howling will be resurrected. That good enough for you? And, as I have said many times, If Huggs maintains a relatively stable program and his team is competitive on the court you won't hear the howling. But Huggs got nothing to do with this. In my opinion, on THAT night against THAT team in THAT game a more accurate QB could have made a serious run at 700 yards passing. And I base that on numerous inaccurate passes that could have easily accounted for another 100-150 yards or more. There were 23 incomplete passes in that game. If that number is reduced to say, 15, meaning another 8 completions, and considering that he completed 28 passes for 532 yards at 19 yards a completion, if you multiple an additional 8 completions by 19 yards you get an extra 152 yards. 532 + 152 = 684 yards. (BTW completing 36 of 51 passes would have been a completion percentage of 70%. You telling me that no one has every completed 70% of their passes in a game? Look at [URL='http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/leaders/pass-cmp-pct-player-career.html']THIS [/URL]and see that a number of college quarterbacks had CAREER completion percentages right around 70%. Look at the Top Ten on that list and see how many of those guys some guy named Dana Holgorsen coached. I understand that you disagree with me. And that's OK. But quit making yourself look silly. 50 Division 1 quarterbacks finished THE SEASON with higher QB ratings than Howard had in that bowl game. The better passers at the upper end of the QB rating scale could have made a serious run at 700 yards in THAT game on THAT night. And those 70% career completion guys could have made a run at 700 on THAT night too. I'm glad that we won and that Sky had a big game. But let's not act like it was an amazing performance. It wasn't. But it was good. And now.... I'm out. You may now console yourself with more name calling and raising issues that have nothing to do with the Cactus Bowl and the ability of superior college football quarterbacks. One more thing .... go ahead and lecture me again about my knowledge and I promise to not respond and let you have the last word. See how nice I can be? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
So much for that "non D1 qb". 532 yards passing 5td's 2int's
Top
Bottom