0-2 against D1 competition this season. Not strong showings against Kan St and Arky.
Yet it's his third season.
I'll sort of give him a pass there, but this blowjob love him some have just don't cut it.
Show me the $.
Mullen is a system head coach. Although this entire message board went into meltdown mode, if we are honest, this past weekend, we saw the most consistent offense that fits Mullen's style since he has become head coach at State. The last time I saw our offense look so effective was when Relf was at his best. Here's why ... Mullen is at his best with a QB like Tebow, Relf, Prescott, etc... If you listened to Mullen's press conference today when asked about if Russell would start Saturday if he was ready for contact, he said more 'Ums' and danced around it saying anyone could lose their job (while he was laughing) and said he would evaluate Russell's practice efforts. Mullen knows his only chance for true success is with Prescott. This gives us good hope for next year, in my opinion. However, Mullen is only able to be effective under the right talent that fits his system. His major issue is... he cannot recruit. Hud would definitely be a better recruiter. However, under Mullen's system (with the right QB), I see Mullen as a better option. Our problem is, we may strike gold every so often with a mobile QB with a great arm, leaving us having many off years.
Contrast this at Ole Miss where Freeze is a consistent coach who doesn't have to have a specific player to win in a system. If State wants to year in and year out compete with Freeze, Hud will have to ultimately be our HC. Freeze can recruit and looks to be consistent as a coach in building a program, but Hud>Freeze if you ask me. Mullen will likely win big next year with Prescott and hit the cashier's table and cash in his chips for the best coaching job elsewhere. If Hud stays where he is another two years, I can really see Hud as our coach in 2015. Call me crazy, but I really see Mullen cashing in the next time his stock rises. He's in the negative at the moment. 2014 will be Mullen's greatest season yet.
Now that's a 17n joke.
I don't care about their history, it's not nearly the same.
Oh hellz yeah. If we won 10 games next year, Mullen left for a $3 mil job at... who cares..., and we hired Hud? I'd be the happiest kid on my block. 1) The amount of money Mullen is getting paid at MSU is nowhere near as much as the next school who wants him is willing to pay, so I don't really think there's THAT much of a possibility of that happening. 2) We'd totally Strick that hire up and probably get someone like Ellis Johnson. I have 0% faith in Scott hiring Hud... or anyone worth while for that matter. Hud will likely be Rich Rod's replacement at Arizona.
Agree with your general post. I actually was encouraged by what I saw at Auburn compared to OK State. OSU was the bottom for me.
Hudspeth was born in Mississippi, so he knows a lot about the culture of the state. Played at a Mississippi school, so he knows about the difficulties that MS public colleges have to deal with. Was the head coach at Winston Academy, so he knows the area. In seven seasons of Div II he took North Alabama to their playoffs five times, four of those to the semifinals. Two straight winning seasons in Lafayette with two bowl games. Why do we have to go for a Division 1 assistant with no head coaching (i.e., administration) experience when we can get a experienced head coach at a slightly lower level? Hudspeth has shown he can coach at the Div. I level, so a step to MSU would be the next logical progression.
Mullen just doesn't seem to have gotten the administrative part down... why can't he divert some of his high pay to hiring better assistants? A top administrator gets the talent needed with the resources available. Sean Payton gave up part of his salary in the Super Bowl year to get Greg Williams, and the Saints got a championship because of it.
Those two games were terrible for me in different ways...
The Auburn game showed that Mullen had learned nothing about game management through all the narrow defeats in the past. And the playcalling, while much better for a half against Auburn, still experienced the same problem a bit later in the game.
We woulda, coulda, shoulda beaten that Auburn team by 14-21 if we keep our foot on the gas the whole game and stick with the gameplan. Good luck finding the last time they lost a night game at Jordan Hare by 14+ to any team that finished outside the top 10. We're pretty close to being a really good team -- I just have no faith in Mullen to figure out how to do his part during the game...
So, someone sell me on why Hud > Mullen
[/COLOR]
About all I can say on the subject is when Hud was at MSU (09 & 10), our offense seemed a lot more innovative and dynamic. Since he's left, we've become very bland and predictable.
Wasn't Hud also the passing game coordinator? I'd say he had a pretty good amount of influence on the offense.
He was indeed. Might not have had the title (might have) but he was basically the asst HC too. I specifically remember that being one of the draws for him to leave his HC position, albeit D2, to become a position coach despite his success as a HC.Wasn't Hud also the passing game coordinator? I'd say he had a pretty good amount of influence on the offense.
Scott doesn't ultimately get to make that choice for football... Our boosters do... and thus why Hud is basically a shoe-in at this point...
We were 113 in passing offense in 2009, and 87 in 2010.He was indeed. Might not have had the title (might have) but he was basically the asst HC too. I specifically remember that being one of the draws for him to leave his HC position, albeit D2, to become a position coach despite his success as a HC.
People read way too much into titles.
We were last for like 20 years leading up to that. Considering our QB in 2009 was Tyson Lee and all of his receivers were freshmen and then in 2010 our QB was Relf... who literally won a game by not throwing an entire half... I think that's pretty good. I don't think the guy is the next Chip Kelly and I've said several times I could care less if we keep Mullen or hire Hud, I truly believe by hiring Hud we'd just be shortcutting the inevitable. I'd like to have him because I think he brings a lot more to the table than Mullen, but neither of them is going to magically turn MSU into a juggernaut. Hud might have a better time grabbing big recruits.We were 113 in passing offense in 2009, and 87 in 2010.