So who impressed you last night?

[Irondawg]

J. Lewis is the obvious candidate, but who elese?

I thought TRlooked sharp and his decision making seemed to be much quicker. I also thought PJ Jones did a nice job and I saw Bohanna and Wells make some nice plays as well.

Slay and Holmes laid some nasty licks on special teams.

And Broomfield clearly has respect of the Memphis DC - they virtually never threw his way.

 

[MaleBovineK9]

Head hunter

 

[MaroonedNdaRock]

Relf passing, Ballard, Lewis, all the 1st team DBs, 53. He is going to be an asset.

But most of all....Dan Mullen. He used opportunity in that game to get us ready for the rest of the season. The two minute drill to end the 1st half. Most coaches sit on the ball there and go into half in that type game. But instead we work on the two minute offense. Then continuing to work on the passing game. We have a well ran football team.

 

[mstatefan88]

Nickoe and Broomfield were destroying people last night. DE's played well. Got edge pressure and got Boyd his sack early. OL blocked well the whole night. Most impressive thing to me though? WR blocking downfield. They freed up Ballard both times on his long TD runs. They were the best overall unit to me on the field last night.

 

[josebrown]

Hell yea!! I am gonna miss him next year. The long, high kickoffs... Bure's speed... was solid Gold last night.

 

[EAVdog]

They were laying some wood.

 

[00Dawg]

I'm getting really tired of home-cooked stats, in any sport. Our team was credited with 2 sacks last night. 2. There was a point we had 2 sacks in 2 plays. I bet the real number was closer to 8, but of course all those sidesteps out of a crumbling pocket magically became intentional QB runs, and TFLs.

 

[FISHDAWG]

.

 

[idog]

WRs - not individually but as a unit, 8 had at least one reception. that's spreading it around and is encouraging to see.

 

[flemdawg1]

I'm getting really tired of home-cooked stats, in any sport. Our team was credited with 2 sacks last night. 2. There was a point we had 2 sacks in 2 plays. I bet the real number was closer to 8, but of course all those sidesteps out of a crumbling pocket magically became intentional QB runs, and TFLs.

Watching on TV the QB almost always got back to the LOS. They were not sacks. But good-on our line for getting him down though.

 

[00Dawg]

Watching on TV the QB almost always got back to the LOS. They were not sacks. But good-on our line for getting him down though.

they got close on several occasions, but I think there was some definite fudging going on.
Meanwhile, they credited us with 3 sacks in the play-by-play, with Sean Ferguson's being left off the rest of the statistics. I think there's also one "rush" credited to "team" for a loss that was a sack. I already deletedmy recording, so I can't go back and check.

 

[Original48]

Since Jack's not able to botch his name I'm going with my wife's pronunciation.

 

[idog]

Watching on TV the QB almost always got back to the LOS. They were not sacks. But good-on our line for getting him down though.

they got close on several occasions, but I think there was some definite fudging going on.
Meanwhile, they credited us with 3 sacks in the play-by-play, with Sean Ferguson's being left off the rest of the statistics. I think there's also one "rush" credited to "team" for a loss that was a sack. I already deletedmy recording, so I can't go back and check.

 

[kired]

Don't think I heard anyone call him by the correct name last night.

 

[VirgilCain]

Quote: I already deleted my recording, so I can't go back and check.

 

[RonnyAtmosphere]

...Relf & Ballard are in a class by themselves.