Some common sense to the lib snowflakes around this country

[Boomboom521]

bigots

Being Black myself, I know there are no Blacks currently alive today who personally knew any slaves. The Left uses this part of our history to justify their revisionist history that America was founded on a lie...that all were NOT created equal.

To them, destroying that part of our heritage opens up the rest of their hateful diatribe of charges that this is and always has been a racist nation. That means you cannot criticize anything that they (Leftists) consider to be a remedy to address the systemic racism they believe the country was founded on and in fact still operates on. It's a disgusting lie and they know it.

It's sickening, and too many Black people have bought into that lie blaming 'racism' or racist attitudes for their inability to advance in our economy or for any thing that comes short of their definition for achievement. The dirty little secret is, there are just as many Black racists in America today as there are surely White ones, but to the Left they (Black racists) do not exist.

Unless you're Christian or Conservative like me. Then you are the worst kind of Uncle Tom, boot licking, shufflin' step 'n fetch it, stupid, ignorant, Oreo cookie kind of Racist. (all names I've been called by both White & Black racist bigots on the Left)

They have zero credibility with me.

Can't even debate slavery and it's place in our history, without you guys breaking the nation down into left-right, right-wrong, American-unAmerican. It's all about winning....always isn't it?

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

The word Creator never appears in the Constitution....not once

Bill of Rights

 

[Boomboom521]

Bill of Rights

Where?

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Where?

****, I meant our DoI.

 

[Boomboom521]

****, I meant our DoI.

IMO, it's used in the Declaration to signify the break of the traditional English "line of divinity". Our founding fathers wanted England to be well aware that we have a DIRECT relationship with our creator, and so our rights are not derivative from the King. It was a fundamental break in traditional ideology.

But no mention of God or a creator was referenced in the Constitution, because the founding fathers specifically wanted this nation to be a nation of law....derived from man, and in no way subject to any specific religious ideology.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

IMO, it's used in the Declaration to signify the break of the traditional English "line of divinity". Our founding fathers wanted England to be well aware that we have a DIRECT relationship with our creator, and so our rights are not derivative from the King. It was a fundamental break in traditional ideology.

But no mention of God or a creator was referenced in the Constitution, because the founding fathers specifically wanted this nation to be a nation of law....derived from man, and in no way subject to any specific religious ideology.

I don't disagree with that.