Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mneilmont" data-source="post: 129275565" data-attributes="member: 1399205">QB argument is difficult for me to follow.&nbsp; Sky is not acceptable because he is 3* and had a difficult time in the bowl game t year.&nbsp; Regular season starts - not bad.&nbsp; And he had some JC starts prior to WV.Crest is 4* with good HS numbers and ability to run.&nbsp; College experience(that I remember) was one series that ended in a fumble and shoulder injury that ended the season.Sills is 4*&nbsp; with good HS numbers at pass and run.Chugs is 3* with good HS numbers that were getting better his Sr year.DH has selected Sky because he is farther advanced in the system.&nbsp; Hell is being raised because some fans had predicted 4* Crest as starter from time he signed LOI.What is justification for such staunch stance for Crest?&nbsp; Sills is a 4* too.&nbsp; College experience cannot be the difference, can it?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mneilmont, post: 129275565, member: 1399205"] QB argument is difficult for me to follow. Sky is not acceptable because he is 3* and had a difficult time in the bowl game t year. Regular season starts - not bad. And he had some JC starts prior to WV. Crest is 4* with good HS numbers and ability to run. College experience(that I remember) was one series that ended in a fumble and shoulder injury that ended the season. Sills is 4* with good HS numbers at pass and run. Chugs is 3* with good HS numbers that were getting better his Sr year. DH has selected Sky because he is farther advanced in the system. Hell is being raised because some fans had predicted 4* Crest as starter from time he signed LOI. What is justification for such staunch stance for Crest? Sills is a 4* too. College experience cannot be the difference, can it? [/QUOTE]

Name