Toggle sidebar

Stans' Sheep of the year Nominations...

Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
I think it's time for the Stans' Sheep of the Year.
Here are a few I think are in the running.

Dawgbreeze
Hanmudog
Brianthedawg
HatfieldMS
KurtRambis4
Sutterkane woya
MadDawg

Please feel free to add anyone I missed.
 
F

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
I think it's time for the Stans' Sheep of the Year.
Here are a few I think are in the running.

Dawgbreeze
Hanmudog
Brianthedawg
HatfieldMS
KurtRambis4
Sutterkane woya
MadDawg

Please feel free to add anyone I missed.
 
S

sleepy dawg

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2009
923
0
0
Everyone who doesn't agree with everything Coach34 says.

I was once labeled sheep on here b/c I had a slight disagreement in what one of you anti Stans people had made up.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
even Hanmu, as big of a sheep as he is, admitted a couple of times this season he had some doubts- but not CoastBreezeDawgLover- he just calls Stansberry and everything is alright for him.
 
hatfieldms

hatfieldms

All-Conference
Feb 20, 2008
8,614
2,152
113
In fact I said myself this year was a huge failure, and he should be fired if we miss the tourney next year.

I just like making fun of your mentally challenged ***, and Stansbury threads are the only place to find you
 
D

Dawgfan61

Sophomore
Mar 2, 2008
736
107
43
cause i don't agree with everything C34 says either. Nor do I fellate him like Fishwater99
 
D

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
You and Fish can now go off on your honeymoon. Now, just to get you all excited, Bost will be back next year and Moutrie will be a Bulldog too. Go call Fish now and ya'll can plot some more and draw up some plays for that Academy league where all the super athletes play.
 
S

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
Sutterkane woya said:
I am far from a basketball expert like peaches, but....

Everyone
seemed to play with a lot better effort for whatever reason....

***BLAH BLAH MY GAY, LONG, LAME ANALYSIS***

...At best that puts us at 9-7.
<span style="font-weight: bold;">That won't be enough, and I personally think Stans will have to go. If
you would've been asked at the beginning of this year if we should fire
Stans if we don't make the tournament, what would you have said? If
you said you were ok with the NIT, </span><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold;">you suck</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">.</span><br style="font-weight: bold;">
Our
coach next year will inherit a pretty talented, veteran team and will
have a legit chance at winning the SEC if he's a good enough Xs and Os
coach. Worst case, we're looking at Kodi, Osby, Bailey, Lewis, and
Riek on the inside, with 2 of them able to play the 3 somewhat.
Ravern, Bost, Smith, Beckham, Turner, and Benock(barf) for guards.
That's still a solid team with the right offensive mind. Not world
beaters, but should be good enough to make it to the tournament.
Click to expand...
http://sixpackspeak.yuku.com?topic=41417

Be sure to vote for me guys. I am the biggest Stans homer there is.
 
H

Hanmudog

Redshirt
Apr 30, 2006
5,853
0
0
Coach34 said:
even Hanmu, as big of a sheep as he is, admitted a couple of times this season he had some doubts- but not CoastBreezeDawgLover- he just calls Stansberry and everything is alright for him.
Click to expand...

A guy that says that a 6-24 SEC record exceeded expectations for Cohen calls ME a sheep?????
 
P

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,062
25,095
113
I'm actually a little surprised I wasn't nominated. I'm a little bit of a Stans sheep, but I'm nowhere near in the same league as Dawgbreeze.
 
War Machine Dawg

War Machine Dawg

Redshirt
Oct 14, 2007
2,832
24
38
The NCAA rules regarding Draft declatation were quoted in said thread. And the rules make it clear the loophole that allowed you to go through the Draft and return have been closed. Bost WILL NOT be a Bulldog next year. But go ahead, continue to spew ridiculous ****.
 
K

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
0
fishwater is approaching JR levels of idiocy. We may not all agree on everything, but at least we all agree that this clown is a moron.
 
K

K Pickles

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2008
55
0
0
I figured I would address it here. I read the rules, and as part of my job is interpreting rules and regulations written by lawyers, the paragraph does not end with "all of the following shall be met:". If that phrase is not included, each subpart should be considered separately. This is usually the way we interpret rules and regs. Only (b) includes the word "and" indicating that the next must occur to make the determination applicable. This would be an easy argument to make and the NCAA could fight it as well. Just saying it is not cut and dry that he cannot come back.
 
mstateglfr

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
15,755
5,545
113
Are you saying that Bost will in fact be able to play next season?

I guess im just not sure how someone can violate the withdrawl date rule and yet fulfill one of the other requirements and be in good standing. Why have the withdrawl deadline to begin with then?
 
O

Optimus Prime 4

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
8,560
0
0
and definitive. I'm also curious as to what kind of job requires interpreting rules written by lawyers, yet isn't actually a lawyer. Just curious on that one.

But there is a reason there is a withdrawal deadline, it's not just a suggestion. And I suggest that anyone suggesting that they have a deadline but it's not actually a requirement is very suggestible. And stupid. But this is all just subjective conjecture about what rules suggest. And maybe their interpretation needs a little elaboration, but that's just a suggestion.
 
M

MSUCostanza

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2007
5,706
0
0
I read this board once a day, and almost never post anymore. Coach and fishwater (among others) have made this board absolutely painful to look at.
 
K

K Pickles

Redshirt
Oct 30, 2008
55
0
0
Optimus Prime 4 said:
<span class="post-title">Maybe they should change the name to
"withdrawal suggestion" because deadline seems so forceful </span>and definitive. I'm also curious as to what kind of job requires interpreting rules written by lawyers, yet isn't actually a lawyer. Just curious on that one.

But there is a reason there is a withdrawal deadline, it's not just a suggestion. And I suggest that anyone suggesting that they have a deadline but it's not actually a requirement is very suggestible. And stupid. But this is all just subjective conjecture about what rules suggest. And maybe their interpretation needs a little elaboration, but that's just a suggestion.
Click to expand...
Maybe because an early withdrawal expedites the situation, and doesn't require as much paperwork? It was a deadline before this new wording was in place as well or is that fact just not convenient for your argument?

Obviously if you miss the date and announce your intention to return to school but are then drafted, you cannot return. If you pull out of the draft, how do you get drafted?

And I won't answer your fishing statement about a job. I will say that lawyers do have to back up any determinations made.

I do agree that elaboration would be helpful, but then lawyers wouldn't be allowed more billable hours to argue finer points.
 
C

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
the threads bashing me over the years were fine and dandy, but now that Stansberry proves to be more and more incompetent, you sheep cant bare to deal with it. I'm sure it's hard to face the fact that even guys like you are starting to wonder if he should be fired when he doesnt make the NCAA's aGAIN next March.


but with 36 replies and nearly 700 hits, somebody is reading the thread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom