Yeah if stoops gets just 3 wins this year, he's gone. No arguing, no bull ****, he's goneTwo words for y'all after a 3-win '16 campaign.
MIKE
LEACH
Yeah if stoops gets just 3 wins this year, he's gone. No arguing, no bull ****, he's goneTwo words for y'all after a 3-win '16 campaign.
MIKE
LEACH
Fortunately for many of us fans, it isn't the people on this board that are making the decisions as to how the program moves forward. I am all for giving Stoops a chance, just show us improvement on the field is all I ask, and that doesn't necessarily mean more victories. I just want to be more competitive. Limit/eliminate the blowout losses.That all sounds good right now, but if they go 5-7 and miss a bowl again, patience might be at a premium for a lot of people. Especially some on this message board![]()
Nobody said he would, we said if. I hope we win 8, doubtful but I hope.Yeah, he will go 3-9 this year. What an IGNORANT comment to make. He's more likely to get 8 wins than only 3 wins.
Still that is a good example of dwelling in the negative.Nobody said he would, we said if. I hope we win 8, doubtful but I hope.
I apologize thenStill that is a good example of dwelling in the negative.
Two words for y'all after a 3-win '16 campaign.
MIKE
LEACH
Name your 4 wins...
Three OOC, possibly four, should have had Transfer U last year, at home this year.
Vandy, at home, again no excuse for not beating them last year. They MIGHT be better, I am pretty sure we will, and it is at home.
MSU, Missouri, and USC, all very good possibilities, one lost a great QB that killed us (and their RB), and the other two have new coaches and systems. And how did we fare against those two last year?
Georgia and Florida are not out of reach, even talent wise now, like they were before. They would be upsets, but Brooks would have made very few bowl games without at least one big upset, it is football. USC in ten, LSU in 07, Georgia and USC several times. And to show you how much we have gained in talent, when Jokers team played Florida in 10 we started MORE two stars than three stars with two walkons, while their TWO DEEP averaged ABOVE a 5.9. I didn't look it up, but I think we have as many four stars starting than two stars now. The 60 team had TWO four stars that played a lot while seven of our SEC opponents (not Vandy, but we beat them) AVERAGED 38 four star commits the previous four years------plus FIVE stars. Bama is out of reach this year, read that they could field NINETEEN five stars------no, not four stars, FIVE stars. What's his name might even get some carries to show us up.
If you really want to look dumb try to dispute the tremendous decrease in the raw talent gap between UK and the rest of the SEC. Thanks Stoops------and the fans that gave up season tickets in the family for decades. And the real kicker might be not the increase in talent, but the incerase in coaching ability------both from more experience AND from better coaches.
No, we won't win all those games, and upsets happen both ways, but I think we go 6-6, with seven wins more likely than five. Three wins, pure BS.
And I think your prediction stinks to high heaven, why are you even here? You either aren't very smart or are trolling.
30th in the nation is much better than we've ever done.Stoops recruiting has been better than any coach at UK for many years.
If Stoops coaching doesn't improve, how much longer can he get the type of players he has the last 3 years? He has got to show he can develop players.
This season, Stoops future is on the line.
If he doesn't show that he can take better players and make a more completive, better team, it may be 10-15 years before UK has a good team.
It's possible Stoops may turn the corner and become a good coach.
I truly hope so.
But so far he hasn't shown it.
Son,
I've been on this particular board for 15 years...
Troll this.
Unproven D line, zero depth
Unproven QBs, no depth
New offensive staff
Very tough schedule
If you paid close attention, we should've lost to EKU last year... Let that sink in a second.
If your argument is that USC and Mizzou will be worse because of new coaching staffs, well then that doesn't bode well for our offense.
I've seen enough of Stoops that I Think I can tell he doesn't know how to manage the game... Too many subs/schemes in the effort to be "multiple". Guys not lined up. Busted coverages, high performance training...pfft.
In EVERY game last year there was a ST mistake. Every gosh damn game.
In every game that we faced a mobile QB, we showed ZERO preparation and ability to stop... We got SCORCHED.
Georgia and Florida, not out of reach? Please. Stop. Please. You lost all credibility. 100% moronic statement. History proves ME right.
Stars shmars. We may have talent per recruiting rankings but I've seen ZERO development and/or improvement, which is yet another indictment of Stoops' coaching ability.
Just win and I'll shut up. Just win, and you can crow. But for now- I suggest you shut up because you're gonna look foolish yet again- blinded by optimism...
Optimism....Of which, will be at a fever pitch come August... The predictions will creep toward world domination after fall practice... EDDIE GRAN JUST HAS "IT FACTOR"...and tempered to a screeching halt after Southern Miss puts up 30 points with Shannon Dawson's dimples laughing at you.
Why does Stoops get such a pass? Recruiting?!? Who cares if you don't win?
He has yet to beat UofL, got curb-stomped by UT and MSU. That's just HIS defense.
Whatever- you'll all be at my stage of acceptance in a year or two. I just want to beat the rush and get a better coach in here who has experience with a cupboard filled with "stars" and decent facilities.
I've been on this particular board for 15 years...
Louisville would've beaten us by 50 if Lamar had played the entire game. We're not beating UL until we fix our horrific defense against running qbs.
If Mark has a winning season and goes to a bowl, some of our "knowledgeable" fans will say this was blind luck delaying his firing one more year.Yeah, he will go 3-9 this year. What an IGNORANT comment to make. He's more likely to get 8 wins than only 3 wins.
UK doesn't have a winning history... Some call the place a graveyard of coaches... But unless they get in NCAA trouble UK does have a history of giving coaches full measure of patience to allow them and the program to be all it can be... I don't see Stoops time here being cut short... Stoops career speculation makes for a spirited thread but it's much ado about nothing.... He's here for the foreseeable future... And if he were to leave I'm going on record saying he's does so of his own volition rather than being nudged out of UK....
Have a nice day ... Think happy thoughts.
I think most of those "negative posters" are just waiting for something good to happen. Furthermore, I think the majority are long time fans like myself who have witnessed a number of false starts to UK football over the past 5 decades. They are good fans but are in a "show me" state. IMO, Year 4 is HUGE for Stoops and Co. Notwithstanding his extremely generous buyout clause, I believe 6 wins and a bowl are critical to his tenure. Consider his predecessors...I don't mind the constant negative posters on the uk football board. Lord knows being a UK football fan is rough. I am very curious though if we see these same negative posters when we start winning. Stoops has this roster ready to compete. We also have a proven OC with quite a bit of talent to work with. This will be the last spring fans will get to ***** about bowl games. I'm looking forward to the next line of complaining about Stoops inability to win the big one.
Joker Phillips is the reason we are in this mess to begin with. Yea he won 6 games with a roster that should have won 8. Stoops has had 2 full recruiting cycles at UK. If you wanna count the first class that he had to throw together in a month then say 3. Yea year 4 is big for any coach rebuilding a team. In saying that Stoops unloaded like 30 players that Joker recruited and 1 went to a division 1 school think about that! We have won 10 games the last 2 years after only winning 4 the previous 2. I want UK to succeed more than anybody but I'm realistic in what Stoops inherited. None of this even accounts for us having to play 5 or 6 ranked teams a year. So to win 7 games and make people happy we have to win 3 games we are not favored in. The best players on this roster are Westry, Baker, Boom, Barker, Elam, Love, Ware, juice, Edwards, Baity. These players where a fr, Soph, soph, fr, soph, N/A, fr, Soph,Fr, Fr. So UK was supposed to win how many games with the young of a talent core?I think most of those "negative posters" are just waiting for something good to happen. Furthermore, I think the majority are long time fans like myself who have witnessed a number of false starts to UK football over the past 5 decades. They are good fans but are in a "show me" state. IMO, Year 4 is HUGE for Stoops and Co. Notwithstanding his extremely generous buyout clause, I believe 6 wins and a bowl are critical to his tenure. Consider his predecessors...
Phillips recorded a 6 win season in Year 1.
Curci, Claiborne, Mumme and Morriss all recorded a 6 win season in Year 2
Bradshaw, Curry and Brooks recorded a 6 win season by Year 4
Eight of Stoops 9 predecessors (i.e., since Collier) have recorded a 6 win season within 4 years.
Now some say that Stoops was left with the worst roster in UK history. That is not exactly true. Coaches get fired because they ain't winning and (except for the elite programs) the "new guy" almost always inherits a weak roster, or maybe worse, NCAA sanctions. Such has been the case for every UK coach except for Phillips and perhaps Curry
Ray took over a UK program that went 8-21-1 (3-17 SEC) in Bradshaw's last 3 years
Curci took over a UK program that went 8-25 (3-18 SEC) in Ray's last 3 years.
Claiborne took over a UK program that went 11-22 (6-14 SEC) in Curci's last 3 years (plus scandals and sanctions)
Curry took over a UK program that went 16-17 (5-15 SEC) in Claiborne's last 3 years.
Mumme took over a UK program that went 9-24 (5-19 SEC) in Curry's last 3 years
Morriss did not stay 3 years and it is difficult to assess what he inherited or what he left his successor
Brooks took over a UK program that was significantly scholarship limited from the Mumme era sanctions
Phillips took over a UK program that went 22-17 (8-16 SEC) in Brooks last 3 years.
IMO, only Phillips and Curry took over a program in reasonably good health. Stoops took over a UK program that went 13-24 (4-18 SEC) in Phillips 3 years; about the same as all his predecessors except Phillips. He enters Year 4 with a 12-24 (4-20 SEC) record seeking that elusive 6 win season. Time for all that great recruiting to start producing wins.
Peace
I think you mean unprecedented.I agree with you on Stoops' job security. The bottom line is you don't have to be a Rhodes scholar to conclude that as long as he recruits at the level he is recruiting at presently, which is unrepresented, we are better off retaining Stoops and hoping he grows into the job, rather than starting over with an unknown who is highly unlikely to ever bring the type of talent to Lexington that we see now. So it's really a no brainer.
That all sounds good right now, but if they go 5-7 and miss a bowl again, patience might be at a premium for a lot of people. Especially some on this message board![]()
I am looking forward to a non QB battle this year. Will be a relief.
Son,
I've been on this particular board for 15 years...
Troll this.
Unproven D line, zero depth
Unproven QBs, no depth
New offensive staff
Very tough schedule
If you paid close attention, we should've lost to EKU last year... Let that sink in a second.
If your argument is that USC and Mizzou will be worse because of new coaching staffs, well then that doesn't bode well for our offense.
I've seen enough of Stoops that I Think I can tell he doesn't know how to manage the game... Too many subs/schemes in the effort to be "multiple". Guys not lined up. Busted coverages, high performance training...pfft.
In EVERY game last year there was a ST mistake. Every gosh damn game.
In every game that we faced a mobile QB, we showed ZERO preparation and ability to stop... We got SCORCHED.
Georgia and Florida, not out of reach? Please. Stop. Please. You lost all credibility. 100% moronic statement. History proves ME right.
Stars shmars. We may have talent per recruiting rankings but I've seen ZERO development and/or improvement, which is yet another indictment of Stoops' coaching ability.
Just win and I'll shut up. Just win, and you can crow. But for now- I suggest you shut up because you're gonna look foolish yet again- blinded by optimism...
Optimism....Of which, will be at a fever pitch come August... The predictions will creep toward world domination after fall practice... EDDIE GRAN JUST HAS "IT FACTOR"...and tempered to a screeching halt after Southern Miss puts up 30 points with Shannon Dawson's dimples laughing at you.
Why does Stoops get such a pass? Recruiting?!? Who cares if you don't win?
He has yet to beat UofL, got curb-stomped by UT and MSU. That's just HIS defense.
Whatever- you'll all be at my stage of acceptance in a year or two. I just want to beat the rush and get a better coach in here who has experience with a cupboard filled with "stars" and decent facilities.
From a schedule standpoint, last year was about as easy as it gets. 2017 and 18 are shaping up to be our best talent . No way to tell what everyone else is gonna do in 2 years but we just have to beat vandy, pinkleless missou, and musch scar to go bowling the next few years and that actually sounds reasonable. Our team has to improve as well with the added talent.
Louisville would've beaten us by 50 if Lamar had played the entire game. We're not beating UL until we fix our horrific defense against running qbs.
If Boom had played the entire game...
The Joker excuse just doesn't hold up any longer. He did have two great players drafted. Part of that 30 players you failed to mention.Joker Phillips is the reason we are in this mess to begin with
3-win '16 campaign?
What are you trying to do, destroy all of your credibility?
Or maybe, after reading this post, you never had any to start with, so nothing to lose.
Joker Phillips is the reason we are in this mess to begin with. Yea he won 6 games with a roster that should have won 8. Stoops has had 2 full recruiting cycles at UK. If you wanna count the first class that he had to throw together in a month then say 3. Yea year 4 is big for any coach rebuilding a team. In saying that Stoops unloaded like 30 players that Joker recruited and 1 went to a division 1 school think about that! We have won 10 games the last 2 years after only winning 4 the previous 2. I want UK to succeed more than anybody but I'm realistic in what Stoops inherited. None of this even accounts for us having to play 5 or 6 ranked teams a year. So to win 7 games and make people happy we have to win 3 games we are not favored in. The best players on this roster are Westry, Baker, Boom, Barker, Elam, Love, Ware, juice, Edwards, Baity. These players where a fr, Soph, soph, fr, soph, N/A, fr, Soph,Fr, Fr. So UK was supposed to win how many games with the young of a talent core?