It's libel not slander.
Yeah because I am the only person to ever post a thread in both places.
This was something I noticed too. I never claimed to have sources on anything. I figured that if Stoops had been told his fate he would've looked a lot different. If you remember how Billy G looked in his press conference after he was fired he looked like the weight of the world had been lifted off his shoulders. I expected that look on Stoops (if he truly was feeling in over his head) or looking defeated. We saw neither.
I got ya. Again, the discussion wasn't what made me so made earlier. It was those who acted as if it were true and began to pilet on. But I agree, I don't know why they didn't do that. If it is what you are suggesting and the rumor was false but they started it for that reason, the someone needs to pay.
Nope. Notice I said he and a multitude of other connected sources. I guess you "missed" that part.
Great win? The game was a battle of who's the worst team in the SEC. You're pathetic. The few wins we do get you ruin by pumping insane amounts of sunshine making wins seem a lot more special than they really are. SC is on its way to a 3-9 4-8 season. And we're on the way to a 4-8 5-7 season. Yea it's a great win for a terrible team. For a decent team or a good team it's a game you need to win every time by 2 TD's. Don't mistake yourself. SC is a horrible team. And they made one of the worst hires of all time hiring Muschamp. It was like a panic hire.
We know what you mean. 6 wins is almost out of the question so we need to buy stoops out because he sucks major donkey lugnutz since he's proven to be a garbage HC. He's a terrible head coach. And beating the worst team in the SEC by one score at home doesn't prove otherwise.
This is kind of how I feel as well. I can certainly a see a Jones tweet in future along of the lines of "wow my sources have told me new information has surfaced regarding Stoops." It's certainly possible that the rumors were made up. I also think UK could be wanting to let fans enjoy the win and make the news on Monday. We get very little SEC wins and I'm sure they didn't want "UK beats South Carolina, fires Mark Stoops" to be the headline. My argument for both sides is that it's merely conjecture. Until Mark Stoops gets fired or until something official comes out blasting those who started the rumors, it's not "for sure" one way or the other. I hope they aren't true. It'd be bad for UK. I've said in posts in the past I like Mark Stoops, seems like a nice enough guy to me, granted I've never met him. I don't think he's a great coach, however.
Nope. Please notify me of the sources outside of Matt jones. And those sources can't just be people quoting Matt jones. I've heard it from MJ and no one else thus far. Not only that. You called this a great win. So us beating possibly/probably the worst team in SEC, and probably the worst HC in D1 (right behind stoops), in stoops 4th year while this is Muschamp's first year with a truly terrible roster and young team. If this is what we consider good wins, then this is a direct indication to how much we suck. We beat the worst SEC team, by 7 at home, a team coached by maybe the worst HC in D1 in his first year of rebuilding with a terrible roster and supremely young team, constitutes as a GREAT FREAKING WIN? With our HC who is in 4th season with team full of his players? Sad. If this was a great win then the NMSU game was an equally GREAT FREAKING WIN.
It seems the defense has looked much better since Stools "took over". Not world beaters, but definitely has changed the direction it was going.
It did seem that way from my seats. Granted I am in upper deck, but did seem to be.
