Success Factor State Championship Club

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,877
2,742
113
I want to especially say Good Luck to Nazareth and IC this coming weekend as they have an opportunity to become the 2nd and 3rd members of the Success Factor State Championship club!

The first member is Montini in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gene K.

godfthr53

All-Conference
Sep 8, 2008
4,964
2,778
113
I want to especially say Good Luck to Nazareth and IC this coming weekend as they have an opportunity to become the 2nd and 3rd members of the Success Factor State Championship club!

The first member is Montini in 2016.
Nazareth double success factor though. will have had won 5a 6a and 7a in the last 5 years. And to think of Racki would have had won in 5 of the 8 classes.
 

Doctor_D

All-Conference
Oct 9, 2016
3,003
2,636
113
Makes me feel old, but it’s hard to believe that I saw Montini play at Wilmington in the 3A (6 class) playoffs.
Now they are beating 8A finalists.

I know the SF is a hot button topic, but looking at this years playoffs, seems like some competitive balance has been struck. Nobody is running through their respective class with ease. I suppose specific supporters want titles at all costs, but compelling games are a good thing for the casual fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexander33

atrain97

Senior
Aug 26, 2011
414
490
63
Makes me feel old, but it’s hard to believe that I saw Montini play at Wilmington in the 3A (6 class) playoffs.
Now they are beating 8A finalists.

I know the SF is a hot button topic, but looking at this years playoffs, seems like some competitive balance has been struck. Nobody is running through their respective class with ease. I suppose specific supporters want titles at all costs, but compelling games are a good thing for the casual fan.
So for all the complaints about SF and multipliers, private schools are guaranteed to win 3 championships, and are picked to win 4. Seems to me that the private’s haven’t been significantly damaged. Only true fair solution would be to have separate playoffs for public and private, which I would be strongly against.
 

CGsupporter

Sophomore
Sep 29, 2009
662
198
0
So for all the complaints about SF and multipliers, private schools are guaranteed to win 3 championships, and are picked to win 4. Seems to me that the private’s haven’t been significantly damaged. Only true fair solution would be to have separate playoffs for public and private, which I would be strongly against.

I agree with you and to not separate the two classes as it adds a lot of fun to the big picture. Publics have been plenty competitive and CG taking down Providence in 2009 for the title after PC took down all of their conference counterparts was top-notch. Unfortunately CG came up a bit short in 2014 against the same team in a very close game...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gene K.

atrain97

Senior
Aug 26, 2011
414
490
63
I agree with you and to not separate the two classes as it adds a lot of fun to the big picture. Publics have been plenty competitive and CG taking down Providence in 2009 for the title after PC took down all of their conference counterparts was top-notch. Unfortunately CG came up a bit short in 2014 against the same team in a very close game...
A big thing that many public’s miss out on is the traditions and consistency of coaching/ programs that many of the private’s enjoy. That’s why programs like CG, PR, GBW, CM.... etc compete so well vs private’s
 
Sep 24, 2009
881
658
0
So for all the complaints about SF and multipliers, private schools are guaranteed to win 3 championships, and are picked to win 4. Seems to me that the private’s haven’t been significantly damaged. Only true fair solution would be to have separate playoffs for public and private, which I would be strongly against.

I don’t want to repeat a long post on this that I’ve posted in the past but as I have laid out previously the SF has spread out the private’s giving them a chance to win more not less titles. If Naz was not success factored up either Simeon or Batavia would be playing SCN for 7a and Naz would be in 5a with JCA and Montini while ICCP would be facing a public in 3a and Bishop Mac facing a public in 4a making 4a a non-lock as a private winner. In that scenario this year the only private locks would be 5a and 8a (and that required a big upset of LWE).

I know I will get some blow back on this part of my answer but so be it.... regarding separate playoffs for public/private.... first, I’ve seen people talking about IHSA benefiting by having two separate playoff series income etc.... folks, if the private’s got split off they would form their own organization... they would not be in the IHSA anymore. In Texas the private’s association is TAPPS (TX assoc. of private and parochial schools) and we would have something similar established here. Now to my point.... in a state like Texas the most historic/big name programs are the public’s: Allen, Southlake Carroll, Desoto, etc, etc.... so the public champion is the revered title and all assume the public champs would beat the private champs (and that’s true in TX). (Side note: in TX a private can play in the public league if they opt in and are willing to play in the largest class, 6a.... only two do that, that I know of, Dallas Jesuit prep and Strake Jesuit of Houston)... I’m of the opinion that in Illinois with its tradition of private programs the exact opposite would be true. It would delegitimize the public champions and people would assume they were inferior to the private champions (even if this was not the case on a team by team basis) and there would be more interest in the private playoffs than the public. I don’t think the public champions really want to put their titles in second class citizen status by doing this. In NJ where they are separate many know of Bergen Catholic or Don Bosco but no one knows/cares about the N.J. public’s.

To the private “haters” who either want separation or stronger multiplication or success factoring... there are states (like Iowa just next door) that put NO penalty on private schools... a private with 500 students is in the same class as the public with 500.
 
Last edited:

Kevin JCHS 81

All-Conference
Jul 16, 2005
1,893
1,503
0
I don’t want to repeat a long post on this that I’ve posted in the past but as I have laid out previously the SF has spread out the private’s giving them a chance to win more not less titles. If Naz was not success factored up either Simeon or Batavia would be playing SCN for 7a and Naz would be in 5a with JCA and Montini while ICCP would be facing a public in 3a and Bishop Mac facing a public in 4a making 4a a non-lock as a private winner. In that scenario this year the only private locks would be 5a and 8a (and that required a big upset of LWE).

I know I will get some blow back on this part of my answer but so be it.... regarding separate playoffs for public/private.... first, I’ve seen people talking about IHSA benefiting by having two separate playoff series income etc.... folks, if the private’s got split off they would form their own organization... they would not be in the IHSA anymore. In Texas the private’s association is TAPPS (TX assoc. of private and parochial schools) and we would have something similar established here. Now to my point.... in a state like Texas the most historic/big name programs are the public’s: Allen, Southlake Carroll, Desoto, etc, etc.... so the public champion is the revered title and all assume the public champs would beat the private champs (and that’s true in TX). (Side note: in TX a private can play in the public league if they opt in and are willing to play in the largest class, 6a.... only two do that, that I know of, Dallas Jesuit prep and Strake Jesuit of Houston)... I’m of the opinion that in Illinois with its tradition of private programs the exact opposite would be true. It would delegitimize the public champions and people would assume they were inferior to the private champions (even if this was not the case on a team by team basis) and there would be more interest in the private playoffs than the public. I don’t think the public champions really want to put their titles in second class citizen status by doing this. In NJ where they are separate many know of Bergen Catholic or Don Bosco but no one knows/cares about the N.J. public’s.

To the private “haters” who either want separation or stronger multiplication or success factoring... there are states (like Iowa just next door) that put NO penalty on private schools... a private with 500 students is in the same class as the public with 500.
Agreed.

Be careful what you ask for, you might just get it.
 

Gene K.

All-Conference
Jul 14, 2016
1,399
2,024
113
Glad Montini didn't play NAZ this year as I think they would have won handily. Next year might be a different story as a lot of sophs and juniors are getting major playing time for the Bronco's this year. But then again JJ is a stud QB and I don't know what Naz has coming back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mchsalumni

MC63

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,537
2,482
113
I don’t want to repeat a long post on this that I’ve posted in the past but as I have laid out previously the SF has spread out the private’s giving them a chance to win more not less titles. If Naz was not success factored up either Simeon or Batavia would be playing SCN for 7a and Naz would be in 5a with JCA and Montini while ICCP would be facing a public in 3a and Bishop Mac facing a public in 4a making 4a a non-lock as a private winner. In that scenario this year the only private locks would be 5a and 8a (and that required a big upset of LWE).

I know I will get some blow back on this part of my answer but so be it.... regarding separate playoffs for public/private.... first, I’ve seen people talking about IHSA benefiting by having two separate playoff series income etc.... folks, if the private’s got split off they would form their own organization... they would not be in the IHSA anymore. In Texas the private’s association is TAPPS (TX assoc. of private and parochial schools) and we would have something similar established here. Now to my point.... in a state like Texas the most historic/big name programs are the public’s: Allen, Southlake Carroll, Desoto, etc, etc.... so the public champion is the revered title and all assume the public champs would beat the private champs (and that’s true in TX). (Side note: in TX a private can play in the public league if they opt in and are willing to play in the largest class, 6a.... only two do that, that I know of, Dallas Jesuit prep and Strake Jesuit of Houston)... I’m of the opinion that in Illinois with its tradition of private programs the exact opposite would be true. It would delegitimize the public champions and people would assume they were inferior to the private champions (even if this was not the case on a team by team basis) and there would be more interest in the private playoffs than the public. I don’t think the public champions really want to put their titles in second class citizen status by doing this. In NJ where they are separate many know of Bergen Catholic or Don Bosco but no one knows/cares about the N.J. public’s.

To the private “haters” who either want separation or stronger multiplication or success factoring... there are states (like Iowa just next door) that put NO penalty on private schools... a private with 500 students is in the same class as the public with 500.
Very thoughtful and educational post. Thank you.
 

Cross Bones

All-Conference
Aug 19, 2001
52,884
3,960
113
The large school championship won by publics 15 of 18 years would be the legit champ.
 

jocas1259

Freshman
Nov 15, 2018
80
67
0
Glad Montini didn't play NAZ this year as I think they would have won handily. Next year might be a different story as a lot of sophs and juniors are getting major playing time for the Bronco's this year. But then again JJ is a stud QB and I don't know what Naz has coming back.
 

jocas1259

Freshman
Nov 15, 2018
80
67
0
Naz has some good skill players coming back on offense , # 9 Reifsteck # 8 Morris # 5 Carrillo . Defense will be solid with # 50 West # 45 Griffin & # 28 Theobald. Problem will be the O-line . All 5 are Seniors this year .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gene K.

Corey90

All-Conference
Aug 27, 2005
8,655
4,080
113
A big thing that many public’s miss out on is the traditions and consistency of coaching/ programs that many of the private’s enjoy. That’s why programs like CG, PR, GBW, CM.... etc compete so well vs private’s

Funny how you leave LWE, MS from the topic. They both perform very well vs private’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bowie50

Irish LB

All-Conference
Apr 11, 2006
1,466
1,260
0
Glad Montini didn't play NAZ this year as I think they would have won handily. Next year might be a different story as a lot of sophs and juniors are getting major playing time for the Bronco's this year. But then again JJ is a stud QB and I don't know what Naz has coming back.
Glad they didn’t play? Montini went 12-2 and narrowly lost the state championship. That’s including 8-1 regular season in CCL Blue. That all tells me they should have taken that game. Water under the bridge now tho.

You think they should play in ‘19 and I agree! Tell them to make the call!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mchsalumni

Gene K.

All-Conference
Jul 14, 2016
1,399
2,024
113
I definitely want to see these two schools compete in football sometime in the near future. Two football powerhouses but this year Naz IMO appeared to have too many superior athletes on both sides of the ball over Montini. Montini has a lot of up and comers and next year they will be very competitive. But, they are losing their top RB Fendanzo and who ever fills in for him will definitely have to be a top athlete or they might not be as good as this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cocacoaler

Gene K.

All-Conference
Jul 14, 2016
1,399
2,024
113
Who do you think will be at RB? Agree that the two lines will be the key to how well Montini does in 2019. A couple of underclass played this year but on Defense they are losing Bruscianelli and West both of whom are playmakers. They did have a couple of Jr linebackers who played well tho and I imagine one of them will take the middle slot.
 

Gene K.

All-Conference
Jul 14, 2016
1,399
2,024
113
Swier is a very good linebacker with good speed. He can definitely play in the the middle. Only seen a couple of soph games but Gerbasi looked like a real good back who can get the tough yards. Don't know much about Harris at RB. Bufkin had a lot of hype coming into the program but did show much last year, probably because Fendanzo was running the hell out of the ball.
 

Wassup13_rivals219252

All-Conference
Nov 9, 2002
5,877
2,742
113
Look out for Gerbasi. Tough soph.

He is a tough runner inside but I think the others give you more speed to the outside. I think they need 3 or more players on offense who have the ability to get to the end zone any time they touch the ball.

The kid who played free safety for the Soph team was impressive. Is Morrissey playing next year? If we had this lineman I think we beat JCA. He is a monster.

Also I think Palumbo and Catalano were juniors. If so possible RBs.

We have Gaines but 2 bad injuries in a row. I think he should try another position besides RB. Maybe WR or corner??
 
Last edited: